Cited by 25Animal Vocal Communication and BehaviorMarine animal studies overviewWildlife Ecology and Conservation

A Collection of Best Practices for the Collection and Analysis of Bioacoustic Data

Open access
Oswald, Julie N., Van Cise, Amy M., Dassow, Angela, Elliott, Taffeta, Johnson, Michael T., Ravignani, Andrea, Podos, Jeffrey·2022·Applied Sciences

Abstract

The field of bioacoustics is rapidly developing and characterized by diverse methodologies, approaches and aims. For instance, bioacoustics encompasses studies on the perception of pure tones in meticulously controlled laboratory settings, documentation of species’ presence and activities using recordings from the field, and analyses of circadian calling patterns in animal choruses. Newcomers to the field are confronted with a vast and fragmented literature, and a lack of accessible reference papers or textbooks. In this paper we contribute towards filling this gap. Instead of a classical list of “dos” and “don’ts”, we review some key papers which, we believe, embody best practices in several bioacoustic subfields. In the first three case studies, we discuss how bioacoustics can help identify the ‘who’, ‘where’ and ‘how many’ of animals within a given ecosystem. Specifically, we review cases in which bioacoustic methods have been applied with success to draw inferences regarding species identification, population structure, and biodiversity. In fourth and fifth case studies, we highlight how structural properties in signal evolution can emerge via ecological constraints or cultural transmission. Finally, in a sixth example, we discuss acoustic methods that have been used to infer predator–prey dynamics in cases where direct observation was not feasible. Across all these examples, we emphasize the importance of appropriate recording parameters and experimental design. We conclude by highlighting common best practices across studies as well as caveats about our own overview. We hope our efforts spur a more general effort in standardizing best practices across the subareas we’ve highlighted in order to increase compatibility among bioacoustic studies and inspire cross-pollination across the discipline.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/app122312046

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adoption of FAIR and TRUST principles along with detailed protocol reporting and open workflows is increasingly viewed as the path forward.

    “Adoption of FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) and TRUST (Transparency, Responsibility, User focus, Sustainability, Technology) principles along with detailed protocol reporting and open workflows is increasingly viewed as the path forward (Oswald et al. 2022; Sequeira et al. 2021).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 168 · Cited by 25

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Bradbury, J.W.; Vehrencamp, S.L. Principles of Animal Communication, 2nd ed.; Oxford University Press: Sunderland, MA, USA, 2011.
  2. Searcy, W.N.S. The Evolution of Animal Communication and Deception in Signaling Systems; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2005.
  3. Crance, J.L.; Bowles, A.E.; Garver, A. Evidence for Vocal Learning in Juvenile Male Killer Whales, Orcinus Orca, from an Adventitious Cross-Socializing Experiment. J. Exp. Biol. 2014, 217, 1229-1237. [CrossRef] · DOI
  4. Pollack, G.S., Mason, A.C., Popper, A.N., Fay, R.R., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 17-47. 116.
  5. Suthers, R.A., Fitch, W.T., Fay, R.R., Popper, A.N., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 1-18. 165.

Authors
Oswald, J. N., Van Cise, A. M., Dassow, A., Elliott, T., Johnson, M. T., Ravignani, A., & Podos, J.
Affiliations
  • University of St Andrews (GB)
  • School of Aquatic and Fisheries Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA
  • Carthage College (US)
  • New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology (US)
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Corresponding author
Oswald, Julie N.
Venue
Applied Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-11-25
Volume
12
Issue
23
Pages
12046
ISSN
2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4310043888
Cited by
25
References
168
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
4.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
  • St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
bioacoustics, best practices, species identification, population structure (demography), biodiversity, signal evolution, cultural transmission, predator-prey dynamics, recording parameters, experimental design, animal vocalizations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review