One-Class Learning for AI-Generated Essay Detection
Open accessAbstract
Detection of AI-generated content is a crucially important task considering the increasing attention towards AI tools, such as ChatGPT, and the raised concerns with regard to academic integrity. Existing text classification approaches, including neural-network-based and feature-based methods, are mostly tailored for English data, and they are typically limited to a supervised learning setting. Although one-class learning methods are more suitable for classification tasks, their effectiveness in essay detection is still unknown. In this paper, this gap is explored by adopting linguistic features and one-class learning models for AI-generated essay detection. Detection performance of different models is assessed in different settings, where positively labeled data, i.e., AI-generated essays, are unavailable for model training. Results with two datasets containing essays in L2 English and L2 Spanish show that it is feasible to accurately detect AI-generated essays. The analysis reveals which models and which sets of linguistic features are more powerful than others in the detection task.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
The spread of true and false news online
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aap9559 · Cited by 8,847 · see citing works
Sallam, M. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11060887 · Cited by 3,126 · see citing works
Chatting about ChatGPT: how may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries?
Lund, B. D., & Wang, T. (2023) · Library Hi Tech News · doi:10.1108/lhtn-01-2023-0009 · Cited by 1,355 · see citing works
The Curious Case of Neural Text Degeneration
Holtzman, A., Buys, J., Du, L., Forbes, M., & Choi, Y. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.09751 · Cited by 1,304 · see citing works
GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Text
Gehrmann, S., Strobelt, H., & Rush, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-3019 · Cited by 470 · see citing works
Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are Fooled
Ippolito, D., Duckworth, D., Callison-Burch, C., & Eck, D. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.00650 · Cited by 264
Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are Fooled
Ippolito, D., Duckworth, D., Callison-Burch, C., & Eck, D. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.164 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Feature-based detection of automated language models: tackling GPT-2, GPT-3 and Grover
Fröhling, L., & Zubiaga, A. (2021) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.443 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Qorich, M., & El Ouazzani, R. (2025) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2025.128405 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
A widely used Generative-AI detector yields zero false positives
Gosling, S. D., Ybarra, K., & Angulo, S. K. (2024) · Aloma: Revista de Psicologia, Ciències de l'Educació i de l'Esport · doi:10.51698/aloma.2024.42.2.31-43 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“…detection methods that do not require labeled training data (e.g., Mitchell et al., 2023); those that can detect AI-generation in ever-smaller units of text, such as sentences (e.g., Wang et al., 2023); and those that generalize successfully across languages (e.g., Corizzo & Leal-Arenas, 2023).”
- Authors
- Corizzo, R., & Leal-Arenas, S.
- Affiliations
- American University (US)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Corresponding author
- Corizzo, Roberto
- Venue
- Applied Sciences
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2023-07-05
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 7901
- ISSN
- 2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4383376720
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 1.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Authorship Attribution and Profiling
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Keywords
- one-class learning, AI-generated text detection, ChatGPT, academic integrity, linguistic features, unsupervised classification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review