Cited by 17Topic ModelingInformation Retrieval and Search BehaviorMultimodal Machine Learning Applications

Layered Query Retrieval: An Adaptive Framework for Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Complex Question Answering for Large Language Models

Open access
Huang, Jie, Wang, Mo, Cui, Yunpeng, Liu, Juan, Chen, Li, Wang, Ting, Li, Huan, Wu, Jinming·2024·Applied Sciences

Abstract

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) addresses the problem of knowledge cutoff and overcomes the inherent limitations of pre-trained language models by retrieving relevant information in real time. However, challenges related to efficiency and accuracy persist in current RAG strategies. A key issue is how to select appropriate methods for user queries of varying complexity dynamically. This study introduces a novel adaptive retrieval-augmented generation framework termed Layered Query Retrieval (LQR). The LQR framework focuses on query complexity classification, retrieval strategies, and relevance analysis, utilizing a custom-built training dataset to train smaller models that aid the large language model (LLM) in efficiently retrieving relevant information. A central technique in LQR is a semantic rule-based approach to distinguish between different levels of multi-hop queries. The process begins by parsing the user’s query for keywords, followed by a keyword-based document retrieval. Subsequently, we employ a natural language inference (NLI) model to assess whether the retrieved document is relevant to the query. We validated our approach on multiple single-hop and multi-hop datasets, demonstrating significant improvements in both accuracy and efficiency compared to existing single-step, multi-step, and adaptive methods. Our method exhibits high accuracy and efficiency, particularly on the HotpotQA dataset, where it outperforms the Adaptive-RAG method by improving accuracy by 9.4% and the F1 score by 16.14%. The proposed approach carefully balances retrieval efficiency with the accuracy of the LLM’s responses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/app142311014

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Huang, J., Wang, M., Cui, Y., Liu, J., Chen, L., Wang, T., Li, H., & Wu, J.
Affiliations
Agricultural Information Institute (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Mo
Venue
Applied Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-11-27
Volume
14
Issue
23
Pages
11014
ISSN
2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4404765644
Cited by
17
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • the National Key Research and Development Program Project (2023YFD1600305, BAIC10-2024-E18, BFGJ2022006, CAAS-ASTIP-2024-AII)
  • Beijing Smart Agriculture Innovation Consortium Project (2023YFD1600305, BAIC10-2024-E18, BFGJ2022006, CAAS-ASTIP-2024-AII)
  • Project of Northern Agriculture and Livestock Husbandry Technical Innovation Center, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (2023YFD1600305, BAIC10-2024-E18, BFGJ2022006, CAAS-ASTIP-2024-AII)
  • the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Science and Technology Innovation Project Grant (2023YFD1600305, BAIC10-2024-E18, BFGJ2022006, CAAS-ASTIP-2024-AII)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
retrieval-augmented generation, multi-hop question answering, natural language inference, relevance assessment, HotpotQA, knowledge cutoff, large language models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review