The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Comprehensive Review on Uncertainty and Risk Modeling Techniques and Their Applications in Power Systems
Open accessAbstract
The increasing integration of renewable energy sources (RESs) into power systems has introduced new complexities due to the inherent variability and uncertainty of these energy sources. In addition to the uncertainty in RES generation, the demand-side load of power systems is also subject to fluctuations, further complicating system operations. Addressing these challenges requires effective modeling and assessment techniques to quantify and mitigate the risks associated with system uncertainties. This paper evaluates the impact of various uncertainty modeling techniques on power system reliability with wind farm integration. Furthermore, this paper reviews the state of the art of the various uncertainty and risk modeling techniques in power systems. Through a detailed case study, the performance of these techniques in modeling uncertainties of wind speeds is analyzed. Based on the results, the integration of wind turbines improves the system’s overall reliability when there is a reduction in conventional power plants (CPPs)’ generation, which are dispatchable energy sources providing a stable and flexible supply. However, the generation of wind farms is associated with uncertainty. The results show Monte Carlo simulation combined with the K-Means method is consistently a more accurate uncertainty model for wind speeds, closely aligning with real-case scenarios, compared to other methods such as Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), robust optimization (RO), and information-gap decision theory (IGDT).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A recent review advocates for the use of advanced uncertainty analysis methods—such as Monte Carlo simulations and scenario analyses—that address both parameter and structural uncertainties42.”
From Systematic review of cost effectiveness and budget impact of artificial intelligence in healthcare (2025) · cites this paper as [42]
Citations
Cites
Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems
Helton, J. C., & Davis, F. J. (2003) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/s0951-8320(03)00058-9 · Cited by 2,719
Zadeh, L. A. (2011) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2011.02.022 · Cited by 1,375
Combination of Evidence in Dempster-Shafer Theory
Sentz, K., & Ferson, S. A. (2002) · OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · doi:10.2172/800792 · Cited by 1,129
Ben-Tal, A., Ghaoui, L. E., & Nemirovski, A. (2021) · Princeton Series in Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1515/9781400831050 · Cited by 1,046
Reserve Requirements for Wind Power Integration: A Scenario-Based Stochastic Programming Framework
Papavasiliou, A., Oren, S. S., & O’Neill, R. P. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2011.2121095 · Cited by 583
A comprehensive review on uncertainty modeling techniques in power system studies
Aien, M., Hajebrahimi, A., & Fotuhi‐Firuzabad, M. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.070 · Cited by 433
Liu, Z., Wen, F., & Ledwich, G. F. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2011.2165972 · Cited by 417
Moghaddam, M. J. H., Kalam, A., Nowdeh, S. A., Ahmadi, A., Babanezhad, M., & Saha, S. (2018) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2018.09.078 · Cited by 328
Learning about risk: Machine learning for risk assessment
Paltrinieri, N., Comfort, L., & Reniers, G. (2019) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.06.001 · Cited by 254
Measurement Placement in Distribution System State Estimation
Singh, R., Pal, B. C., & Vinter, R. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2009.2016457 · Cited by 238
Stochastic Modeling of Power Demand Due to EVs Using Copula
Lojowska, A., Kurowicka, D., Papaefthymiou, G., & van der Sluis, L. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2012.2192139 · Cited by 219
Risk analysis using FMEA: Fuzzy similarity value and possibility theory based approach
Mandal, S., & Maiti, J. (2013) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.10.058 · Cited by 160
Bohre, A. K., Agnihotri, G., & Dubey, M. (2016) · IET Generation Transmission & Distribution · doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2015.1034 · Cited by 160
Investigating Distributed Generation Systems Performance Using Monte Carlo Simulation
El‐Khattam, W., Hegazy, Y. G., & Salama, M. M. A. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2006.873131 · Cited by 151
Probabilistic analysis for optimal power flow under uncertainty
Zhang, H., & Li, P. (2010) · IET Generation Transmission & Distribution · doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2009.0374 · Cited by 150
A Fuzzy-Optimization Approach to Dynamic Economic Dispatch Considering Uncertainties
Attaviriyanupap, P., Kita, H., Tanaka, E., & Hasegawa, J. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2004.831272 · Cited by 127
Analysis of Probabilistic Optimal Power Flow Taking Account of the Variation of Load Power
Li, X., Li, Y., & Zhang, S. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2008.926437 · Cited by 110
Reliability Evaluation Considering Wind and Hydro Power Coordination
Karki, R., Hu, P., & Billinton, R. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2009.2032758 · Cited by 110
Fuzzy MILP Unit Commitment Incorporating Wind Generators
Venkatesh, B., Yu, P., Gooi, H. B., & Choling, D. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2008.2004724 · Cited by 103
Security-Constrained Generation and Transmission Outage Scheduling With Uncertainties
Wu, L., Shahidehpour, M., & Fu, Y. M. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2010.2040124 · Cited by 102
Su, C. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2009.2034968 · Cited by 97
Exploitation of Electric-Drive Vehicles in Electricity Markets
Pantoš, M. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2011.2172005 · Cited by 92
Transmission Network Planning Under Security and Environmental Constraints
Kazerooni, A., & Mutale, J. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2009.2036800 · Cited by 79
Nojavan, S., Zare, K., & Feyzi, M. R. (2012) · Electric Power Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2012.10.006 · Cited by 72
Zeng, B., Wei, X., Zhao, D., Singh, C., & Zhang, J. (2018) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.07.111 · Cited by 67
Khaloie, H., Abdollahi, A., Rashidinejad, M., & Siano, P. (2019) · International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems · doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.03.021 · Cited by 60
Bulut, E., Albak, E. İ., Sevi̇lgen, G., & Öztürk, F. (2021) · Case Studies in Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.csite.2021.101452 · Cited by 59
Andrews, J., & Tolo, S. (2022) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2022.108959 · Cited by 59
Tian, W., de Wilde, P., Li, Z., Song, J., & Yin, B. (2018) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2018.08.086 · Cited by 54
Fathi, R., Tousi, B., & Galvani, S. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125984 · Cited by 52
Reliability Evaluation of Equipment and Substations With Fuzzy Markov Processes
Ge, H., & Asgarpoor, S. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2009.2038387 · Cited by 52
Reliability Analysis of Phasor Measurement Unit Considering Data Uncertainty
Wang, Y., Li, W., Zhang, P., Wang, B., & Lu, J. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2012.2183901 · Cited by 47
Integrated fuzzy state estimation and load flow analysis in distribution networks
Sarić, A. T., & Ćirić, R. M. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2003.809680 · Cited by 46
Zhang, C., Li, Y., Zhang, H., Wang, Y., Huang, Y., & Xu, J. (2024) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2024.110367 · Cited by 45
Zhang, X., Goh, M., Bai, S., & Wang, Q. (2024) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2024.120728 · Cited by 44
Scenario Analysis in Risk Management
Hassani, B. K. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25056-4 · Cited by 43
Uncertainty Management for Robust Industrial Design in Aeronautics
(2018) · Notes on numerical fluid mechanics and multidisciplinary design · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-77767-2 · Cited by 43
Cai, J., Hao, L., Xu, Q., & Zhang, K. (2021) · Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments · doi:10.1016/j.seta.2021.101792 · Cited by 42
Liu, C., Zheng, X., Yang, H., Tang, W., Sang, G., & Cui, H. (2023) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121983 · Cited by 41
Ghaffarinasab, N., Çavuş, Ö., & Kara, B. Y. (2022) · Transportation Research Part B Methodological · doi:10.1016/j.trb.2022.11.008 · Cited by 41
Fuzzy Self-Scheduling for GenCos
Yamin, H. Y. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2004.836176 · Cited by 41
Importance Sampling of Injected Powers for Electric Power System Security Analysis
Perninge, M., Lindskog, F., & Söder, L. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2011.2162654 · Cited by 40
Roukerd, S. P., Abdollahi, A., & Rashidinejad, M. (2019) · International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems · doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.05.011 · Cited by 40
Li, Z., Liu, M., Xie, M., & Zhu, J. (2022) · International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems · doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2022.108316 · Cited by 38
A risk and safety science perspective on the precautionary principle
Aven, T. (2023) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106211 · Cited by 37
Calculation of Measurement Correlations Using Point Estimate
Caro, E., Morales, J. M., Conejo, A. J., & Mı́nguez, R. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2010.2041796 · Cited by 37
Wang, J., Xu, L., Cai, J., Fu, Y., & Bian, X. (2022) · Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments · doi:10.1016/j.seta.2022.101951 · Cited by 32
Monte-Carlo Simulation-Based Statistical Modeling
Chen, D.-G., & Chen, J. D. (2017) · ICSA book series in statistics · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-3307-0 · Cited by 32
Dueñas, P., Reneses, J., & Barquı́n, J. (2011) · IET Generation Transmission & Distribution · doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2010.0264 · Cited by 31
A stochastic-robust optimization model for inter-regional power system planning
Kang, J., Wu, Z., Ng, T. S., & Su, B. (2023) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2023.03.024 · Cited by 29
Chen, M. L., Cao, X., Zhang, Z., Yang, L., Ma, D., & Li, M. (2024) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123569 · Cited by 26
Li, J., Yu, Z., Mu, G., Li, B., Zhou, J., Yan, G., Zhu, X., & Li, C. (2024) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124291 · Cited by 26
Liu, Y., Wang, J., & Yue, Z. (2022) · International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems · doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2022.108283 · Cited by 25
Early Evolution of LOLP: Evaluating Generating Capacity Requirements [History]
Billinton, R., & Chu, K. (2015) · IEEE Power and Energy Magazine · doi:10.1109/mpe.2015.2417475 · Cited by 25
Safety Science, a Systems Thinking Perspective: From Events to Mental Models and Sustainable Safety
van Blokland, P. J., & Reniers, G. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12125164 · Cited by 24
Reliability Evaluation of Phasor Measurement Unit Using Type-2 Fuzzy Set Theory
Cherukuri, M., Varma, K. A., Roy, D. S., & Mohanta, D. K. (2014) · IEEE Systems Journal · doi:10.1109/jsyst.2014.2309191 · Cited by 22
Optimizing probabilistic spinning reserve by an umbrella contingencies constrained unit commitment
Wang, M. Q., Yang, M. Y., Liu, Y., Han, X., & Wu, Q. (2019) · International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems · doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.01.034 · Cited by 22
Zhang, X., & Pirouzi, A. (2024) · Energy Reports · doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2024.01.016 · Cited by 22
Risk-based Peer-to-peer Energy Trading with Info-Gap Approach in the Presence of Electric Vehicles
Seyyedeh-Barhagh, S., Abapour, M., Mohammadi‐Ivatloo, B., & Shafie‐khah, M. (2023) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2023.104948 · Cited by 21
Wang, H., Yi, Z., Xu, Y. C., Cai, Q., Li, Z., Wang, H., & Bai, X. (2024) · Electric Power Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2024.110224 · Cited by 21
Wu, Y., Chen, M.-R., Shen, K., & Wang, J. (2024) · Journal of Energy Storage · doi:10.1016/j.est.2024.110900 · Cited by 19
Clarifying the Interpretation and Use of the LOLE Resource Adequacy Metric
Stephen, G., Tindemans, S. H., Fazio, J., Dent, C. J., Figueroa-Acevedo, A. L., Bagen, B., Crawford, A., Klaube, A., Logan, D. M., & Burke, D. (2022) · International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems (PMAPS) · doi:10.1109/pmaps53380.2022.9810615 · Cited by 17
Kan, R., Xu, Y., Li, Z., & Lu, M. (2024) · Electric Power Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2024.110197 · Cited by 17
Huang, D. (2024) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2024.110427 · Cited by 17
Chen, L., Chen, C., Wang, L., Zeng, W., & Li, Z. (2023) · Nuclear Engineering and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.net.2023.03.033 · Cited by 16
Utilizing Energy Storage for Operational Adequacy of Wind-Integrated Bulk Power Systems
Shrestha, T. K., & Karki, R. (2020) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app10175964 · Cited by 15
Pesteh, S., Moayyed, H., & Miranda, V. (2019) · Electric Power Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2019.106035 · Cited by 15
Yarmohammadi, H., & Abdi, H. (2024) · Electric Power Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2024.110877 · Cited by 15
Jakob Bernoulli, Ars conjectandi (1713)
Schneider, I. (2005) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-044450871-3/50087-5 · Cited by 13
Dai, J., Ding, C., Yan, C., Tang, Y. P., Zhou, X., & Xue, F. (2023) · International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems · doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2023.109599 · Cited by 13
Maulik, A. (2022) · Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments · doi:10.1016/j.seta.2022.102756 · Cited by 11
Skare, E., & Jore, S. H. (2024) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106521 · Cited by 11
Quiles, E., Marquina-Tajuelo, A., Blay, C. R., & Roldán-Porta, C. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app132111623 · Cited by 10
Reis, D. J. F., & Pessanha, J. E. O. (2023) · International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems · doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2023.109297 · Cited by 8
Calderaro, V., Lamberti, F., Galdi, V., & Piccolo, A. (2018) · Electric Power Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2018.01.008 · Cited by 8
Feedback for energy conservation: An info-gap approach
Ben‐Haim, Y. (2021) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.119957 · Cited by 7
Generation expansion planning considering efficient linear EENS formulation
Sun, D., Zheng, Z., Liu, S., Wang, M., Sun‡, Y., & Liu, D. (2021) · Global Energy Interconnection · doi:10.1016/j.gloei.2021.07.004 · Cited by 7
Cui, Z., Zheng, M., Wang, J., & Liu, J. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app132011546 · Cited by 6
Odat, A.-S. A., Shawaqfah, M., AlMomani, F. A., & Shboul, B. (2023) · Data in Brief · doi:10.1016/j.dib.2023.109853 · Cited by 6
Day-ahead Generation Scheduling with Information Gap Decision Models
Sasaki, Y., Takahashi, N., Zoka, Y., Yorino, N., Bedawy, A., Krifa, C., & Sekizkai, S. (2024) · IFAC-PapersOnLine · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2024.07.475 · Cited by 5
Monetary‐based availability: A novel approach to assess the performance of wind turbines
Lutz, M., Görg, P., Faulstich, S., Cernusko, R., & Pfaffel, S. (2019) · Wind Energy · doi:10.1002/we.2411 · Cited by 4
Analysis of climate change mitigations by nuclear energy using nonlinear fuzzy set theory
Woo, T. H., Jang, K. B., Baek, C. H., & Choi, J. D. (2022) · Nuclear Engineering and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.net.2022.06.026 · Cited by 3
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Billinton, R., and Ronald, N.A. (2013). Reliability Evaluation of Power Systems, Springer Science & Business Media.
- Gupta, A.K., and Varga, T. (2013). An Introduction to Actuarial Mathematics, Springer Science & Business Media.
- (2024, December 03). IEEE 24-Bus RTS. Available online: https://matpower.org/docs/ref/matpower5.0/case24_ieee_rts.html.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Systematic review of cost effectiveness and budget impact of artificial intelligence in healthcare
El Arab, R. A., & Al Moosa, O. A. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01722-y · Cited by 149
“A recent review advocates for the use of advanced uncertainty analysis methods — such as Monte Carlo simulations and scenario analyses — that address both parameter and structural uncertainties 42 .”
Carozzani, A., & D’Alpaos, C. (2025) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en18205535 · Cited by 19
Assessment of Transmission Reliability Margin: Existing Methods and Challenges and Future Prospects
Edeh, U. E., Lie, T. T., & Mahmud, M. A. (2025) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en18092267 · Cited by 16
Shabanian‐Poodeh, M., Hooshmand, R., Shafie‐khah, M., & Siano, P. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3556233 · Cited by 16
Păsculescu, D., Riurean, S. M., Obretenova, M. I., Lazăr, T., Tătar, A. M., & Fîţă, N. D. (2025) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en19010148 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Afzali, P., Hosseini, S. A., & Peyghami, S.
- Affiliations
- Aalborg University (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Afzali, Peyman
- Peyghami, Saeed
- Venue
- Applied Sciences
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2024-12-23
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 12042
- ISSN
- 2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4405725328
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 82
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 14
- FWCI
- 7.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Power System Reliability and Maintenance
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Power System Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
- Keywords
- uncertainty modeling, risk modeling, power system reliability, wind power integration, wind speed uncertainty, renewable energy variability, Monte Carlo simulation, K-means clustering, Markov chain Monte Carlo, robust optimization, information gap decision theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
