Cited by 4Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic SystemsPhotovoltaic System Optimization TechniquesSolar Energy Systems and Technologies

Dynamic Modeling and Experimental Validation of the Photovoltaic/Thermal System

Open access
Sredenšek, Klemen, Simonič, Eva, Deželak, Klemen, Bizjak, Marko, Lukač, Niko, Seme, Sebastijan·2025·Applied Sciences

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present a novel and comprehensive methodology for the dynamic modeling and experimental validation of a photovoltaic/thermal system. The dynamic model is divided into thermal and electrical subsystems, encompassing the photovoltaic/thermal module and the thermal energy storage. The thermal subsystem of both the photovoltaic/thermal module and the thermal energy storage is described by a one-dimensional dynamic model of heat transfer mechanisms and optical losses, while the electrical subsystem is presented as an electrical equivalent circuit of double diode solar cell. Model validation was conducted on a modern experimental photovoltaic/thermal system over an extended operational period at a five-minute resolution, with validation days classified as sunny, cloudy, or overcast based on weather conditions, thereby demonstrating an applied approach. The results demonstrate the lowest deviation values reported to date, confirmed using six quantitative indicators. The added value of the proposed methodology, not previously addressed in the literature, lies in the following contributions: (i) comprehensive modeling of the entire photovoltaic/thermal system, (ii) accurate consideration of optical losses in the photovoltaic/thermal module, and (iii) long-term experimental validation. Overall, the proposed methodology provides a reliable and efficient framework for PV/T system design, optimization, and long-term performance assessment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/app151910505

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 74 · Cited by 4

Authors
Sredenšek, K., Simonič, E., Deželak, K., Bizjak, M., Lukač, N., & Seme, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Maribor (SI)
  • Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia (SI)
Corresponding author
Sredenšek, Klemen
Venue
Applied Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2025-09-28
Volume
15
Issue
19
Pages
10505
ISSN
2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4414588933
Cited by
4
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 4
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Maribor digital library (University of Maribor) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • European Regional Development Fund
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Solar Energy Systems and Technologies
Keywords
photovoltaic-thermal systems, dynamic modeling, thermal energy storage, one-dimensional heat transfer model, optical loss, solar cell modeling, model validation, weather conditions, long-term performance evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review