Cited by 0Body Composition Measurement TechniquesElectrical and Bioimpedance TomographyObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Evaluation of Five Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Equations Against Air-Displacement Plethysmography in an Eastern European Population

Open access
Cretescu, Iuliana, Munteanu, Oana, Mocanu, Valeria, Horhat, Raluca·2026·Applied Sciences

Abstract

Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a widely used and an easy-to-apply method for determining body composition. However, its accuracy depends on population-specific equations. The aim of the present study is to identify the most appropriate fat-free mass (FFM) prediction equation for an Eastern European population using air-displacement plethysmography (ADP) as the reference method. The study group included 101 Caucasian subjects (56 women and 45 men) with an average body mass index (BMI) of 25.37 ± 5.45 kg/m2. One set of FFMBIA values was automatically calculated with the analyzer (Maltron BioScan 920-2), and four others were computed using the published equations of Kyle, Kanellakis, Heitman, and Deurenberg. The results were compared to FFMADP values measured using a BOD POD Gold Standard Body Composition Tracking System by Bland–Altman analysis. The smallest bias was obtained with the equation by Deurenberg, which underestimated FFM by only −0.22 ± 4.52 kg. The largest bias was obtained with the equation by Kyle (5.92 ± 4.73 kg), followed by the formula of Kanellakis (3.04 ± 4.65 kg). The equations by Heitman and the Maltron inbuilt formula overestimated FFM by 2.15 ± 4.27 kg and, respectively, 1.95 ± 4.3 kg. Although Maltron’s automatically generated values were very strongly correlated with ADP results (CCC = 0.93, SEE = 4.7), the formula by Deurenberg provided the most reliable estimates in the studied population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/app16021082

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Barbosa-Silva, M.C.G.; Barros, A.J. Bioelectrical impedance analysis in clinical practice: A new perspective on its use beyond body composition equations. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2005, 8, 311-317. [CrossRef] · DOI
  2. Roman, G. Eating Patterns, Physical Activity and Their Association with Demographic Factors in the Population Included in the Obesity Study in Romania (ORO Study). Acta Endocrinol. Buchar. 2016, 12, 47-51. [PubMed]
  3. Balan, I.M.; Gherman, E.D.; Gherman, R.; Brad, I.; Pascalau, R.; Popescu, G.; Trasca, T.I. Sustainable Nutrition for Increased Food Security Related to Romanian Consumers' Behavior. Nutrients 2022, 14, 4892. [CrossRef] · DOI
  4. Heitmann, B.L. Evaluation of body fat estimated from body mass index, skinfolds and impedance. A comparative study. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1990, 44, 831-837.
  5. Deurenberg, P.; van der Kooy, K.; Leenen, R.; Weststrate, J.A.; Seidell, J.C. Sex and age specific prediction formulas for estimating body composition from bioelectrical impedance: A cross-validation study. Int. J. Obes. 1991, 15, 17-25.
  6. Dupertuis, Y.M.; Jimaja, W.; Beardsley Levoy, C.; Genton, L. Bioelectrical impedance analysis instruments: How do they differ, what do we need for clinical assessment? Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2025, 28, 379-387. [CrossRef] · DOI

Authors
Cretescu, I., Munteanu, O., Mocanu, V., & Horhat, R.
Affiliations
  • Department of Functional Sciences, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
  • Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara (RO)
Corresponding author
  • Munteanu, Oana
  • Mocanu, Valeria
Venue
Applied Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2026-01-21
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
1082
ISSN
2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7125147957
Cited by
0
References
43
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
“Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
bioelectrical impedance analysis, air displacement plethysmography, body composition, Eastern European populations, Bland-Altman agreement, BOD POD

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review