Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 34Music and Audio ProcessingSpeech and Audio ProcessingMusic Technology and Sound Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 29 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Audio Time Stretching Using Fuzzy Classification of Spectral Bins

Open access
Damskägg, Eero-Pekka, Välimäki, Vesa·2017·Applied Sciences

Abstract

A novel method for audio time stretching has been developed. In time stretching, the audio signal’s duration is expanded, whereas its frequency content remains unchanged. The proposed time stretching method employs the new concept of fuzzy classification of time-frequency points, or bins, in the spectrogram of the signal. Each time-frequency bin is assigned, using a continuous membership function, to three signal classes: tonalness, noisiness, and transientness. The method does not require the signal to be explicitly decomposed into different components, but instead, the computing of phase propagation, which is required for time stretching, is handled differently in each time-frequency point according to the fuzzy membership values. The new method is compared with three previous time-stretching methods by means of a listening test. The test results show that the proposed method yields slightly better sound quality for large stretching factors as compared to a state-of-the-art algorithm, and practically the same quality as a commercial algorithm. The sound quality of all tested methods is dependent on the audio signal type. According to this study, the proposed method performs well on music signals consisting of mixed tonal, noisy, and transient components, such as singing, techno music, and a jazz recording containing vocals. It performs less well on music containing only noisy and transient sounds, such as a drum solo. The proposed method is applicable to the high-quality time stretching of a wide variety of music signals.

Overview

CoChat Summary

TL;DR

The paper proposes a phase-vocoder time-stretching method that uses fuzzy classification of each STFT bin as tonal, noisy, or transient, then applies phase propagation and transient handling according to those continuous memberships. In a listening test, the proposed method was competitive with a state-of-the-art academic method and a commercial algorithm, with quality depending strongly on the audio excerpt.

Key findings

  • The proposed method assigns each time-frequency bin continuous membership values for tonalness, noisiness, and transientness, avoiding explicit decomposition into separate signal components.
  • Across all eight excerpts, mean opinion scores (MOS, 1–5) were: for α = 1.5, PV 1.9, HP 3.3, EL 3.5, PROP 3.4; for α = 2.0, PV 1.5, HP 2.9, EL 3.1, PROP 3.1. The standard phase vocoder (PV) performed worse than all other tested methods.
  • The proposed method scored best on CastViolin (MOS 4.1 at both α = 1.5 and α = 2.0), Jazz (3.6 at α = 1.5; 3.7 at α = 2.0), Techno at α = 1.5 (4.1), and JJCale at α = 2.0 (3.2). It performed more poorly on DrumSolo (2.3 at α = 1.5; 1.8 at α = 2.0) and Classical (3.3 at α = 1.5; 2.8 at α = 2.0).
  • The paper concludes the proposed method yields slightly better quality than HP and practically the same quality as EL overall, but performance depends on signal type.

Methods

  • The method uses STFT analysis/synthesis with sample rate 44.1 kHz, Hann window length N = 4096, synthesis hop size H_s = 512, and K = 4096 frequency bins. Median filtering lengths were 200 ms in time and 500 Hz (46 bins) in frequency; transient detection threshold was 10^-4; constants b_n = b_α = 4.
  • A listening test was conducted online with the Web Audio Evaluation Tool. Eleven subjects participated (10 male, 1 female; ages 23–37, median 28; all had acoustics background, 10 had prior listening-test experience).
  • Eight audio excerpts and two stretching factors (α = 1.5 and α = 2.0) were tested with four methods: proposed method (PROP), standard phase vocoder (PV), harmonic-percussive separation (HP), and élastique (EL). Each subject rated 64 samples on a 1–5 quality scale; mean opinion scores were computed.

Limitations

  • The paper states the method still suffers to some extent from the fixed time and frequency resolution of the STFT, and suggests applying fuzzy classification to a multiresolution time-frequency transform. It also notes poorer performance on DrumSolo and Classical, likely because individual transients were not resolved due to the relatively long analysis window, and additional computational complexity compared with the standard phase-locked vocoder.
  • Evident from the text: the listening test used only 11 subjects, mostly male and all with acoustics backgrounds, so results may not generalize to broader listeners; only eight excerpts and two stretching factors were tested; no statistical significance tests are reported.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/app7121293

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Figures

Figure 1 Spectrogram of a signal consisting of piano, percussion, and double bass.
Figure 1 Spectrogram of a signal consisting of piano, percussion, and double bass.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 2 ( a ) Spectrogram of pink noise and ( b ) the histogram of tonalness values for its spectrogram bins.
Figure 2 ( a ) Spectrogram of pink noise and ( b ) the histogram of tonalness values for its spectrogram bins.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 3 The relations between the three fuzzy classes.
Figure 3 The relations between the three fuzzy classes.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 4 ( a ) Tonalness, ( b ) noisiness, and ( c ) transientness values for the short-time Fourier transform (STFT) bins of the example audio signal. Cf. Figure 1.
Figure 4 ( a ) Tonalness, ( b ) noisiness, and ( c ) transientness values for the short-time Fourier transform (STFT) bins of the example audio signal. Cf. Figure 1.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 5 A contour plot of the phase randomization factor An , with bn = b a = 4. TSM: time-scale modification.
Figure 5 A contour plot of the phase randomization factor An , with bn = b a = 4. TSM: time-scale modification.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 6 Illustration of the proposed transient detection. ( a ) Frame transientness. Locations of the detected transients are marked with purple circles; ( b ) Time derivative of the frame transientness. Detected transient onsets are marked with orange crosses. The red dashed line shows the transient detection threshold.
Figure 6 Illustration of the proposed transient detection. ( a ) Frame transientness. Locations of the detected transients are marked with purple circles; ( b ) Time derivative of the frame transientness. Detected transient onsets are marked with orange crosses. The red dashed line shows the transient detection threshold.CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 7
CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 8 Cont .
Figure 8 Cont .CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 8 Mean opinion scores for eight audio samples using four TSM methods for ( a ) medium ( a = 1.5), and ( b ) large ( a = 2.0) TSM factors. The rightmost bars show the average score for all eight samples. PV: phase vocoder; HP: harmonic-percussive separation [28]; EL: élastique [36]; PROP: proposed method.
Figure 8 Mean opinion scores for eight audio samples using four TSM methods for ( a ) medium ( a = 1.5), and ( b ) large ( a = 2.0) TSM factors. The rightmost bars show the average score for all eight samples. PV: phase vocoder; HP: harmonic-percussive separation [28]; EL: élastique [36]; PROP: proposed method.CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 Valid · 0 Not valid · 13 Not checked · 49 Own results and interpretations

36 more claims

Create a free account to see all 62 claims and to verify the 27 references still open.

See all claims — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 13
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 8

Create a free account to see these claims.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

2 more claims about this paper

Create a free account to see every claim other papers make about this one.

See all claims — free account

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Moinet, A., Dutoit, T., and Latour, P. (2013, January 2–5). Audio time-scaling for slow motion sports videos. Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Audio Effects (DAFx), Maynooth, Ireland.
  2. Verma, T.S., and Meng, T.H. (1998, January 19–21). Time scale modification using a sines+transients+noise signal model. Proceedings of the Digital Audio Effects Workshop (DAFx), Barcelona, Spain.
  3. Roucos, S., and Wilgus, A. (1985, January 26–29). High quality time-scale modification for speech. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Tampa, FL, USA.
  4. Röbel, A. (2010, January 6–10). A shape-invariant phase vocoder for speech transformation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Audio Effects (DAFx), Graz, Austria.
  5. Del Amo, A., Montero, J., and Cutello, V. (1999, January 10–12). On the principles of fuzzy classification. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society, New York, NY, USA.
  6. Kraft, S., Lerch, A., and Zölzer, U. (2013, January 2–5). The tonalness spectrum: Feature-based estimation of tonal components. Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Audio Effects (DAFx), Maynooth, Ireland.

Cited by

See all 34

Metadata

Authors
Damskägg, E.-P., & Välimäki, V.
Affiliations
Aalto University (FI)
Corresponding author
Damskägg, Eero-Pekka
Venue
Applied Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2017-12-12
Volume
7
Issue
12
Pages
1293
ISSN
2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2771971536
Cited by
34
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Aaltodoc (Aalto University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Aalto-Yliopisto
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Music Technology and Sound Studies
Keywords
fuzzy classification, noisiness, transience, phase propagation, membership functions, sound quality, music signals, listening tests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-14, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-14 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.