Cited by 209Technology Use by Older AdultsAugmented Reality ApplicationsVirtual Reality Applications and Impacts

Potential of Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality Technologies to Promote Wellbeing in Older Adults

Open access
Lee, Li Na, Kim, Mi Jeong, Hwang, Won Ju·2019·Applied Sciences

Abstract

Older adults face significant loss and limitations in terms of mobility, cognitive ability, and socialization. By using augmented reality and virtual reality technologies they have the potential to overcome such loss and limitations, and to eventually improve their quality of life. However, this group is often excluded in augmented reality and virtual reality deployment. Further, limited studies address their challenges when using augmented reality and virtual reality. Therefore, for a critical review of augmented reality and virtual reality for older adults, we developed a framework to evaluate related factors, including physical, social, and psychological wellbeing. Through the critical review, we identified that most augmented reality and virtual reality studies focus on physical wellbeing of older adults but also make substantial efforts to increase their psychological wellbeing. Fun factors that would motivate them are also extensively considered. Further, social isolation continues to be a significant issue for older adults, but the appropriate content to increase their social wellbeing is insufficient, although many commercial products have been developed. The contribution of the present study is to provide a contextual framework and an evaluation framework for the critical review of augmented reality and virtual reality technologies to promote wellbeing in older adults. This study also suggests the augmented reality and virtual reality research direction for studies on this group by identifying the research gap through the critical review process. Lastly, this study investigates design directions of augmented reality and virtual reality for older adults by introducing challenges and design issues that emerged through the critical review.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/app9173556

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, L. N., Kim, M. J., & Hwang, W. J.
Affiliations
  • Department of Software and Information Systems, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA
  • Hanyang University (KR)
  • Kyung Hee University (KR)
Corresponding author
Kim, Mi Jeong
Venue
Applied Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-08-30
Volume
9
Issue
17
Pages
3556
ISSN
2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2970255715
Cited by
209
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 9
FWCI
28.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of the Korean government (19AUDP-B127891-03)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Augmented Reality Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Keywords
augmented reality, virtual reality, older adults, well-being, physical well-being, psychological well-being, social well-being, social isolation, quality of life, evaluation framework, elderly-friendly design, research gaps, user motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review