The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Current Techniques for Diabetes Prediction: Review and Case Study
Open accessAbstract
Diabetes is one of the most common diseases worldwide. Many Machine Learning (ML) techniques have been utilized in predicting diabetes in the last couple of years. The increasing complexity of this problem has inspired researchers to explore the robust set of Deep Learning (DL) algorithms. The highest accuracy achieved so far was 95.1% by a combined model CNN-LSTM. Even though numerous ML algorithms were used in solving this problem, there are a set of classifiers that are rarely used or even not used at all in this problem, so it is of interest to determine the performance of these classifiers in predicting diabetes. Moreover, there is no recent survey that has reviewed and compared the performance of all the proposed ML and DL techniques in addition to combined models. This article surveyed all the ML and DL techniques-based diabetes predictions published in the last six years. In addition, one study was developed that aimed to implement those rarely and not used ML classifiers on the Pima Indian Dataset to analyze their performance. The classifiers obtained an accuracy of 68%–74%. The recommendation is to use these classifiers in diabetes prediction and enhance them by developing combined models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045
Cho, N. H., Shaw, J. E., Karuranga, S., Huang, Y., da Rocha Fernandes, J. D., Ohlrogge, A. W., & Malanda, B. (2018) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2018.02.023 · Cited by 7,283
Miotto, R., Li, L., Kidd, B. A., & Dudley, J. T. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep26094 · Cited by 1,710
Bio inspired computing – A review of algorithms and scope of applications
Kar, A. K. (2016) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2016.04.018 · Cited by 578
Cited by
Saba, T. (2020) · Journal of Infection and Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2020.06.033 · Cited by 284
Self-citationGupta, H., Varshney, H., Sharma, T. K., Pachauri, N., & Verma, O. P. (2022) · Complex & Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/s40747-021-00398-7 · Cited by 191
Jacobs, P. G., Herrero, P., Facchinetti, A., Vehi, J., Kovatchev, B., Breton, M. D., Cinar, A., Nikita, K. S., Doyle, F. J., Bondia, J., et al. (2024) · IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/rbme.2023.3331297 · Cited by 113
Hasan, R., Dattana, V., Mahmood, S., & Hussain, S. (2024) · Information · doi:10.3390/info16010007 · Cited by 44
Elfayoumi, M., AbouElazm, M., Mohamed, O., Abuhmed, T., & El-Sappagh, S. (2025) · 2025 19th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication (IMCOM) · doi:10.1109/imcom64595.2025.10857525 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Larabi-Marie-Sainte, S., Aburahmah, L., Almohaini, R., & Saba, T.
- Venue
- Applied Sciences
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2019-10-29
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 4604
- ISSN
- 2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2985328577
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current Techniques for Diabetes Prediction: Review and Case Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/app9214604
- The paper
- Larabi-Marie-Sainte, S., Aburahmah, L., Almohaini, R., & Saba, T. (2019). Current Techniques for Diabetes Prediction: Review and Case Study. Applied Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9214604
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.