CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 14Power Systems and TechnologiesSmart Grid and Power SystemsSmart Grid Security and Resilience

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Modeling Intelligent Control Switch IEC 61850 Based Substation Automation Communication

Open access
Nimma, Kutaiba, Faraj, Sabah·2018·Applied System Innovation
DOI 10.3390/asi1010007
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

With the advent of the new information technologies, the power communication service object is continuously enhanced by the modernization level of the switches architecture designed in the substation automation environment. In the futuristic plan, the communication network not only provides a transmission line between devices, but also takes into account the reliability and efficiency of the power system communication network. Many protocols are used for the provision of faster and more robust communication among control centers, Remote Terminal Units (RTUs) and Intelligent Electronic Devices (IEDs). These protocols support the exchange of a wide range of possible common data that is organized by a DATA-SET, such as in synchronized circuit breaker switching, distance protection and overcurrent protection. However, these protocols do not give the expected performance with standard switches architectures due to the remarkable traffic in power system communication. To address this issue, this paper modelled a substation automation switch based on the packet forwarder technique based on Generic Object Oriented Substation Event (GOOSE) protocol with different architectures of substation automation switches based International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 61850 standard. Finally, the simulations results found that the architecture of the four-switch system showed a significant performance, as compared with other architectures.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/asi1010007

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 61850 communication profile [10]. Figure 1. International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 61850 communication profile [10].
Figure 1 International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 61850 communication profile [10]. Figure 1. International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 61850 communication profile [10].CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 2 Generic Object Oriented Substation Event.(GOOSE) multicast concept [14]. Figure 2. Generic Object Oriented Substation Event.(GOOSE) multicast concept [14].
Figure 2 Generic Object Oriented Substation Event.(GOOSE) multicast concept [14]. Figure 2. Generic Object Oriented Substation Event.(GOOSE) multicast concept [14].CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 3 Publisher and subscriber GOOSE technique [17]. Figure 3. Publisher and subscriber GOOSE technique [17].
Figure 3 Publisher and subscriber GOOSE technique [17]. Figure 3. Publisher and subscriber GOOSE technique [17].CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 4 Network connection multifunction architecture [9]. Figure 4. Network connection multifunction architecture [9].
Figure 4 Network connection multifunction architecture [9]. Figure 4. Network connection multifunction architecture [9].CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 5 Proposed switch architecture design. Figure 5. Proposed switch architecture design.
Figure 5 Proposed switch architecture design. Figure 5. Proposed switch architecture design.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 6 Switch Architecture using SimEvents. Figure 6. Switch Architecture using SimEvents.
Figure 6 Switch Architecture using SimEvents. Figure 6. Switch Architecture using SimEvents.CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 7
CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 8 Four switches technique in SimEvents. Figure 8. Four switches technique in SimEvents.
Figure 8 Four switches technique in SimEvents. Figure 8. Four switches technique in SimEvents.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 9 Switch controller architecture in SimEvents. Figure 9. Switch controller architecture in SimEvents.
Figure 9 Switch controller architecture in SimEvents. Figure 9. Switch controller architecture in SimEvents.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 10 Single buffer drop packets of the switch. Figure 10. Single buffer drop packets of the switch.
Figure 10 Single buffer drop packets of the switch. Figure 10. Single buffer drop packets of the switch.CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 11
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 12
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 13
CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 14 Number of drop packets versus simulation time for four -switch architecture system. Figure 14. Number of drop packets versus simulation time for four-switch architecture system.
Figure 14 Number of drop packets versus simulation time for four -switch architecture system. Figure 14. Number of drop packets versus simulation time for four-switch architecture system.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 15 Comparison number of drop packets of the four mechanisms. Figure 15. Comparison number of drop packets of the four mechanisms.
Figure 15 Comparison number of drop packets of the four mechanisms. Figure 15. Comparison number of drop packets of the four mechanisms.CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 16
CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Adamiak, M., Baigent, D., and Evans, S. (2000, January 1–2). Practical considerations in application of UCA GOOSE. Proceedings of the Georgia Tech Relay Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 14

Related

Metadata

Authors
Nimma, K., & Faraj, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
  • Middle Technical University (IQ)
Corresponding author
Nimma, Kutaiba
ORCID
Nimma, Kutaiba
Venue
Applied System Innovation
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2018-03-16
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
7
ISSN
2571-5577 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3390/asi1010007
OpenAlex
W2793802842
Cited by
14
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
Applied System Innovation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Power Systems and Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid and Power Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Smart Grid Security and Resilience
Keywords
substation automation, IEC 61850, GOOSE protocol, intelligent electronic devices, packet forwarding, switch architecture, communication network reliability, circuit breaker switching, remote terminal units, power system communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review