COVID-19 Tweets Classification Based on a Hybrid Word Embedding Method
Open accessAbstract
In March 2020, the World Health Organisation declared that COVID-19 was a new pandemic. This deadly virus spread and affected many countries in the world. During the outbreak, social media platforms such as Twitter contributed valuable and massive amounts of data to better assess health-related decision making. Therefore, we propose that users’ sentiments could be analysed with the application of effective supervised machine learning approaches to predict disease prevalence and provide early warnings. The collected tweets were prepared for preprocessing and categorised into: negative, positive, and neutral. In the second phase, different features were extracted from the posts by applying several widely used techniques, such as TF-IDF, Word2Vec, Glove, and FastText to capture features’ datasets. The novelty of this study is based on hybrid features extraction, where we combined syntactic features (TF-IDF) with semantic features (FastText and Glove) to represent posts accurately, which helps in improving the classification process. Experimental results show that FastText combined with TF-IDF performed better with SVM than the other models. SVM outperformed the other models by 88.72%, as well as for XGBoost, with an 85.29% accuracy score. This study shows that the hybrid methods proved their capability of extracting features from the tweets and increasing the performance of classification.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
FastText's capability to represent problematic words enhances its generalizability.
“This capability also enhances its generalizability (Didi et al. 2022).”
From Large language models (LLMs): survey, technical frameworks, and future challenges (2024) · cites this paper as Didi et al. 2022
Section 3.3.3 (FastText; page unavailable) says FastText can produce embeddings for misspelled, rare, and out-of-dictionary words. That supports its ability to handle problematic words, but the paper does not establish that this capability improves generalizability. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 38
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Kabir, M.; Madria, S. CoronaVis: A real-time COVID-19 tweets data analyzer and data repository. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2004.13932. · arXiv
- Rajput, N.K.; Grover, B.A.; Rathi, V.K. Word frequency and sentiment analysis of twitter messages during coronavirus pandemic. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2004.03925. · arXiv
- Ghadeer, A.S.; Aljarah, I.; Alsawalqah, H. Enhancing the Arabic sentiment analysis using different preprocessing operators. New Trends Inf. Technol. 2017, 113, 113-117.
- Alqurashi, S.; Hamoui, B.; Alashaikh, A.; Alhindi, A.; Alanazi, E. Eating garlic prevents COVID-19 infection: Detecting misinformation on the arabic content of twitter. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2101.05626. · arXiv
- Loper, E.; Bird, S. Nltk: The natural language toolkit. arXiv 2002, arXiv:0205028.
- Mikolov, T.; Chen, K.; Corrado, G.; Dean, J. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv 2013, arXiv:1301.3781. · arXiv
- Joulin, A.; Grave, E.; Bojanowski, P.; Douze, M.; Jégou, H.; Mikolov, T. Fasttext. zip: Compressing text classification models. arXiv 2016, arXiv:1612.03651. · arXiv
- Ho, T.K. Random decision forests. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, Montreal, QC, Canada, 14-16 August 1995; Volume 1, pp. 278-282.
- Authors
- Didi, Y., Walha, A., & Wali, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Sfax (TN)
- Department of Computer Science, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 24243, Saudi Arabia
- Corresponding author
- Didi, Yosra
- Venue
- Big Data and Cognitive Computing
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2022-05-18
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 58
- ISSN
- 2504-2289 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4280515006
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5
- FWCI
- 2.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Big Data and Cognitive Computing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Umm Al-Qura University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Text and Document Classification Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, Twitter, sentiment analysis, tweet classification, TF-IDF, FastText, gloves, Word2Vec, feature extraction, social media, disease prevalence prediction, early warning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review