Cited by 8Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

A New Generative Model for Textual Descriptions of Medical Images Using Transformers Enhanced with Convolutional Neural Networks

Open access
Barreto, Artur Gomes, de Oliveira, Juliana Martins, Gois, Francisco Nauber Bernardo, Cortez, Paulo Cesar, de Albuquerque, Victor Hugo Costa·2023·Bioengineering

Abstract

The automatic generation of descriptions for medical images has sparked increasing interest in the healthcare field due to its potential to assist professionals in the interpretation and analysis of clinical exams. This study explores the development and evaluation of a generalist generative model for medical images. Gaps were identified in the literature, such as the lack of studies that explore the performance of specific models for medical description generation and the need for objective evaluation of the quality of generated descriptions. Additionally, there is a lack of model generalization to different image modalities and medical conditions. To address these issues, a methodological strategy was adopted, combining natural language processing and features extraction from medical images and feeding them into a generative model based on neural networks. The goal was to achieve model generalization across various image modalities and medical conditions. The results showed promising outcomes in the generation of descriptions, with an accuracy of 0.7628 and a BLEU-1 score of 0.5387. However, the quality of the generated descriptions may still be limited, exhibiting semantic errors or lacking relevant details. These limitations could be attributed to the availability and representativeness of the data, as well as the techniques used.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/bioengineering10091098

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Images belonging to the ’radiology’ subset of the ROCO dataset.
Figure 1 Images belonging to the ’radiology’ subset of the ROCO dataset.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Images belonging to the ’non-radiology’ subset of the ROCO dataset.
Figure 2 Images belonging to the ’non-radiology’ subset of the ROCO dataset.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Example of random images from the dataset and their respective three-word descriptions.
Figure 3 Example of random images from the dataset and their respective three-word descriptions.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Listing of a portion of the frequency of all keywords.
Figure 4 Listing of a portion of the frequency of all keywords.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 The proposed generative model.
Figure 5 The proposed generative model.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6 Examples of input images and true and generated descriptions.
Figure 6 Examples of input images and true and generated descriptions.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 17 · Cited by 8

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Pelka, O., Koitka, S., Rückert, J., Nensa, F., and Friedrich, C.M. (2018). Intravascular Imaging and Computer Assisted Stenting and Large-Scale Annotation of Biomedical Data and Expert Label Synthesis, Springer International Publishing.

Metadata

Authors
Barreto, A. G., de Oliveira, J. M., Gois, F. N. B., Cortez, P. C., & de Albuquerque, V. H. C.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal do Ceará (BR)
  • Graduate Program in Teleinformatics Engineering, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza 60455-970, Brazil
  • Controladoria e Ouvidoria Geral do Estado, Governo do Estado do Ceará, Fortaleza 60822-325, Brazil
  • Department of Teleinformatics Engineering, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza 60455-970, Brazil
Venue
Bioengineering
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-09-19
Volume
10
Issue
9
Pages
1098
ISSN
2306-5354 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386893702
Cited by
8
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioengineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
CNPq (313599/2019-0, 305517/2022-8)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Keywords
generative models, transformer models, convolutional neural networks, medical image feature extraction, medical report generation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A New Generative Model for Textual Descriptions of Medical Images Using Transformers Enhanced with Convolutional Neural Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/bioengineering10091098
The paper
Barreto, A. G., de Oliveira, J. M., Gois, F. N. B., Cortez, P. C., & de Albuquerque, V. H. C. (2023). A New Generative Model for Textual Descriptions of Medical Images Using Transformers Enhanced with Convolutional Neural Networks. Bioengineering. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10091098