Cited by 8Dental Research and COVID-19Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationDental Radiography and Imaging

Teledentistry for Pediatric Dental Emergency: Comparison Between Experienced and Novice Users

Open access
Huang, Chih-Chieh, Chen, Jung-Wei·2024·Bioengineering

Abstract

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, teledentistry was often employed for pediatric emergency treatments. Dental students acted as the first health providers using teledentistry under the supervision of faculties in most hospital-based or university-based medical centers during the lockdown period. The aims of this study were to assess the quality of using teledentistry among general dentists (GDs) and dental students (DSs) for managing pediatric dental emergencies. Methods: In total, 60 DSs and 85 GDs were recruited in this study. Each participant was assigned to one of five teledentistry emergency scenarios in pediatric dentistry using a stratified random assignment method. Teledentistry with five emergency scenario simulations was used to evaluate the quality of diagnosis (QD) and treatment (QT) and the detailed information (DI) among all participants. A post-visit survey collected demographic data, usability, confidence in diagnosis (CD), and confidence in treatment recommendation (CT). Descriptive and inferential statistics data were analyzed. The significance level was set as p < 0.05. Results: Overall, the study showed that GDs and DSs can use teledentistry to provide good quality of diagnosis (74.5%) and treatment recommendations (77.2%). When encountering pediatric dental emergency scenarios, GDs scored significantly higher (p < 0.001) than DSs regarding QD, QT, CD, and CT. Significant differences were noted in QD (p < 0.001), QT (p < 0.001), CD (p = 0.045), and DI (p = 0.042) when the subjects encountered five different scenarios. Significant correlations were noted between the amount of detailed information subjects obtained with the quality of diagnosis and treatment recommendation. Confidence in diagnosis is significantly correlated to the quality of diagnosis (p = 0.034) and treatment recommendation (p = 0.042). However, the confidence in treatment recommendation is not correlated with either QD or QT. Both GDs and DSs hold positive attitudes toward the usability of teledentistry. Conclusions: Teledentistry is effective for diagnosing and managing pediatric dental emergencies. Experienced users provided a better quality of visit compared to novice users, so dental students should be supervised when performing a teledentistry visit.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/bioengineering11111054

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The integration of artificial intelligence in teledentistry has enhanced diagnostic precision and treatment planning by facilitating caries detection, radiograph analysis, and caries risk assessment.

    “The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in teledentistry has enhanced diagnostic precision and treatment planning by facilitating caries detection, radiograph analysis, and caries risk assessment [84].”

    From Minimally Invasive Techniques for Managing Dental Caries in Children: Efficacy, Applications, and Future Directions (2025) · cites this paper as [84]

    The Introduction says AI in teledentistry enables accurate diagnosis and tailored interventions. It does not identify AI-assisted caries detection, radiograph analysis, or caries risk assessment, and the study’s reported diagnostic and treatment-planning results concern teledentistry rather than an AI intervention. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. [3]Jampani N.D. Nutalapati R. Dontula B.S. Boyapati R. Applications of teledentistry: A literature review and update J. Int. Soc. Prev. Community Dent. 2011 1 37 44 24478952 PMC3894070
  2. [5]Flores A. Lazaro S.A. Molina-Bastos C.G. Guattini V.L.O. Umpierre R.N. Goncalves M.R. Carrard V.C. Teledentistry in the diagnosis of oral lesions: A systematic review of the literature J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2020 27 1166 1172 10.1093/jamia/ocaa069 32568392 PMC7647318 · DOI
  3. [6]Wallace C.K. Schofield C.E. Burbridge L.A.L. O’Donnell K.L. Role of teledentistry in paediatric dentistry Br. Dent. J. 2021 1 6 10.1038/s41415-021-3015-y 34172921 PMC8231751 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [7]Estai M. Kanagasingam Y. Mehdizadeh M. Vignarajan J. Norman R. Huang B. Spallek H. Irving M. Arora A. Kruger E. Teledentistry as a novel pathway to improve dental health in school children: A research protocol for a randomised controlled trial BMC Oral Health 2020 20 11 10.1186/s12903-019-0992-1 31937284 PMC6961289 · DOI
  5. [8]Ackerman M.B. Teleorthodontic treatment with clear aligners: An analysis of outcome in treatment supervised by general practitioners versus orthodontic specialists J. Dent. Res. Rep. 2019 2 1 4 10.15761/JDRR.1000114 · DOI
  6. [9]Carrard V.C. Roxo Goncalves M. Rodriguez Strey J. Pilz C. Martins M. Martins M.D. Schmitz C.A. Dal Moro R.G. D’Avila O.P. Rados D. Telediagnosis of oral lesions in primary care: The EstomatoNet Program Oral Dis. 2018 24 1012 1019 10.1111/odi.12851 29505701 · DOI
  7. [10]Khan S.A. Omar H. Teledentistry in practice: Literature review Telemed. J. e-Health 2013 19 565 567 10.1089/tmj.2012.0200 23672799 · DOI
  8. [12]Bahramian H. Gharib B. Baghalian A. COVID-19 Considerations in Pediatric Dentistry JDR Clin. Transl. Res. 2020 5 307 311 10.1177/2380084420941503 32663415 · DOI
  9. [13]Abbas B. Wajahat M. Saleem Z. Imran E. Sajjad M. Khurshid Z. Role of Teledentistry in COVID-19 Pandemic: A Nationwide Comparative Analysis among Dental Professionals Eur. J. Dent. 2020 14 S116 S122 10.1055/s-0040-1722107 33383589 PMC7775233 · DOI
  10. [14]Batra P. Tagra H. Katyal S. Artificial Intelligence in Teledentistry Discoveries 2022 10 153 10.15190/d.2022.12 36530958 PMC9748636 · DOI
  11. [15]Ibrahim S.A. Pronovost P.J. Diagnostic Errors, Health Disparities, and Artificial Intelligence JAMA Health Forum 2021 2 e212430 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.2430 36218658 · DOI
  12. [16]Ghai S. Teledentistry during COVID-19 pandemic Diabetes Metab. Syndr. 2020 14 933 935 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.06.029 32593116 PMC7297180 · DOI
  13. [17]Jayaraman J. Dhar V. Moorani Z. Donly K. Tinanoff N. Mitchell S. Wright T. Impact of COVID-19 on Pediatric Dental Practice in the United States Pediatr. Dent. 2020 42 180 183 32522318
  14. [18]Haimi M. Brammli-Greenberg S. Baron-Epel O. Waisman Y. Assessing patient safety in a pediatric telemedicine setting: A multi-methods study BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 2020 20 63 10.1186/s12911-020-1074-7 32245469 PMC7126468 · DOI
  15. [19]Gurgel-Juarez N. Torres-Pereira C. Haddad A.E. Sheehy L. Finestone H. Mallet K. Wiseman M. Hour K. Flowers H.L. Accuracy and effectiveness of teledentistry: A systematic review of systematic reviews Evid.-Based Dent. 2022 1 8 10.1038/s41432-022-0257-8 PMC9264296 35804195 · DOI
  16. [20]Alabdullah J.H. Daniel S.J. A Systematic Review on the Validity of Teledentistry Telemed. J. e-Health 2018 24 639 648 10.1089/tmj.2017.0132 29303678 · DOI
  17. [21]De Vasconcellos L.G.O. Brentel A.S. Vanderlei A.D. De Vasconcellos L.M.R. Valera M.C. De Araujo M.A.M. Knowledge of general dentists in the current guidelines for emergency treatment of avulsed teeth and dental trauma prevention Dent. Traumatol. 2009 25 578 583 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2009.00820.x 19788428 · DOI
  18. [22]Rodd H.D. Farman M. Albadri S. Mackie I.C. Undergraduate experience and self-assessed confidence in paediatric dentistry: Comparison of three UK dental schools Br. Dent. J. 2010 208 221 225 10.1038/sj.bdj.2010.207 20228757 · DOI
  19. [23]Machado J.P. Lam X.T. Chen J.W. Use of a clinical decision support tool for the management of traumatic dental injuries in the primary dentition by novice and expert clinicians Dent. Traumatol. 2018 34 120 128 10.1111/edt.12390 29476702 · DOI
  20. [24]Ines Meurer M. Caffery L.J. Bradford N.K. Smith A.C. Accuracy of dental images for the diagnosis of dental caries and enamel defects in children and adolescents: A systematic review J. Telemed. Telecare 2015 21 449 458 10.1177/1357633X15605225 26377122 · DOI
  21. [26]Kavadella A. Dias da Silva M.A. Kaklamanos E.G. Stamatopoulos V. Giannakopoulos K. Evaluation of ChatGPT’s Real-Life Implementation in Undergraduate Dental Education: Mixed Methods Study JMIR Med. Educ. 2024 10 e51344 10.2196/51344 38111256 PMC10867750 · DOI
  22. [27]Martens L.C. Rajasekharan S. Jacquet W. Vandenbulcke J.D. Van Acker J.W.G. Cauwels R. Paediatric dental emergencies: A retrospective study and a proposal for definition and guidelines including pain management Eur. Arch. Paediatr. Dent. 2018 19 245 253 10.1007/s40368-018-0353-9 29949083 · DOI
  23. [28]Jung C.P. Tsai A.I. Chen C.M. A 2-year retrospective study of pediatric dental emergency visits at a hospital emergency center in Taiwan Biomed. J. 2016 39 207 213 10.1016/j.bj.2016.06.004 27621123 PMC6138820 · DOI
  24. [29]Fouad A.F. Abbott P.V. Tsilingaridis G. Cohenca N. Lauridsen E. Bourguignon C. O’Connell A. Flores M.T. Day P.F. Hicks L. International Association of Dental Traumatology guidelines for the management of traumatic dental injuries: 2. Avulsion of permanent teeth Dent. Traumatol. 2020 36 331 342 10.1111/edt.12573 32460393 · DOI
  25. [30]Chen J.W. Hobdell M.H. Dunn K. Johnson K.A. Zhang J. Teledentistry and its use in dental education J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2003 134 342 346 10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0164 12699048 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, C.-C., & Chen, J.-W.
Affiliations
  • Independent Researcher, Longview, WA 98632, USA
  • Loma Linda University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Huang, Chih-Chieh
  • Chen, Jung-Wei
Venue
Bioengineering
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-10-23
Volume
11
Issue
11
Pages
1054
ISSN
2306-5354 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403688178
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3
FWCI
7.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioengineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Loma Linda University Center for Dental Research
  • California Society of Pediatric Dentistry Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › General Dentistry › Dental Research and COVID-19
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Radiography and Imaging
Keywords
teledentistry, pediatric dental emergencies, dental students, general dentists, treatment guidelines, user experience, COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth usability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review