Earthworm Species from Diverse Ecological Groups Negatively Affect Enchytraeid Density in a Forest Ecosystem
Open accessAbstract
Earthworms and enchytraeids are two very important groups of soil organisms that influence soil biology and ecology, as well as physicochemical processes occurring in the soil. The interactions within and between these major groups of soil fauna are currently among the most pressing topics in soil ecology and are still insufficiently understood. In a field mesocosm experiment, we examined the effects of the density of the following five key earthworm species in Central Europe: Dendrobaena octaedra, Lumbricus rubellus, L. terrestris, Aporrectodea caliginosa, and Allobophora chlorotica. These species were selected to represent the following three major ecological groups of lumbricids: epigeic, endogeic, and anecic. The mesocosm experiment examined the effect of these species across density gradients and at two soil profile horizons—litter and mineral soil—and at the entire soil profile within the mesocosm. This comprehensive and unique approach was used to compare the effects of earthworm density gradient on enchytraeid abundance under identical conditions in the forest soil. The results indicate that all studied species of earthworm negatively affected enchytraeid density. The strength of this effect depended on the earthworm species, earthworm density, and the level of the analyzed soil profile. Epigeic L. rubellus, endogeic Aporrectodea caliginosa, and anecic L. terrestris appeared to be the most effective. Higher earthworm density had a greater effect on the density of enchytraeids. The most significant results concerned the litter layer, where the density of enchytraeids was highest due to their natural occurrence. Our results provide new insights into the ecological relationships among key groups of soil fauna and can be a starting point for predicting changes caused by earthworms in newly occupied ecosystems.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52
- Authors
- Karaban, K., Kaliszewicz, A., Ilieva-Makulec, K., & Uvarov, A. V.
- Affiliations
- Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw (PL)
- Institute of Biological Sciences, Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw, Wóycickiego 1/3, 01-938 Warsaw, Poland
- Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
- Corresponding author
- Karaban, Kamil
- Venue
- Biology
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2025-09-17
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1283
- ISSN
- 2079-7737 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12467703
- OpenAlex
- W4414310551
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Poland (2P04F03030)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine Biology and Ecology Research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Keywords
- earthworms, Enchytraeidae, Lumbricus terrestris, Lumbricus rubellus, Aporrectodea caliginosa, Dendrobaena octaedra, earthworm density, epigeic earthworms, endogeic earthworms, anecic earthworms, forest soils, litter layer, soil horizons, mesocosm experiment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review