Cited by 39Computational Drug Discovery MethodsProtein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and Function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

CavitySpace: A Database of Potential Ligand Binding Sites in the Human Proteome

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Location and properties of ligand binding sites provide important information to uncover protein functions and to direct structure-based drug design approaches. However, as binding site detection depends on the three-dimensional (3D) structural data of proteins, functional analysis based on protein ligand binding sites is formidable for proteins without structural information. Recent developments in protein structure prediction and the 3D structures built by AlphaFold provide an unprecedented opportunity for analyzing ligand binding sites in human proteins. Here, we constructed the CavitySpace database, the first pocket library for all the proteins in the human proteome, using a widely-applied ligand binding site detection program CAVITY. Our analysis showed that known ligand binding sites could be well recovered. We grouped the predicted binding sites according to their similarity which can be used in protein function prediction and drug repurposing studies. Novel binding sites in highly reliable predicted structure regions provide new opportunities for drug discovery. Our CavitySpace is freely available and provides a valuable tool for drug discovery and protein function studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/biom12070967

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 41 · Cited by 39

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Sperandio, 2010, Druggable pockets and binding site centric chemical space: A paradigm shift in drug discovery, Drug Discov. Today, 15, 656, 10.1016/j.drudis.2010.05.015 · DOI
  2. Consortium, 2019, Protein Data Bank: The single global archive for 3D macromolecular structure data, Nucleic Acids Res., 47, D520, 10.1093/nar/gky949 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Xie, 2015, Methods for predicting protein–ligand binding sites, Mol. Modeling Proteins, 1215, 383, 10.1007/978-1-4939-1465-4_17 · DOI
  4. Dhakal, 2021, Artificial intelligence in the prediction of protein–ligand interactions: Recent advances and future directions, Brief. Bioinform., 23, bbab476, 10.1093/bib/bbab476 · DOI
  5. Ito, 2011, PoSSuM: A database of similar protein–ligand binding and putative pockets, Nucleic Acids Res., 40, D541, 10.1093/nar/gkr1130 · DOI
  6. Kufareva, 2011, Pocketome: An encyclopedia of small-molecule binding sites in 4D, Nucleic Acids Res., 40, D535, 10.1093/nar/gkr825 · DOI
  7. Maietta, 2013, FireDB: A compendium of biological and pharmacologically relevant ligands, Nucleic Acids Res., 42, D267, 10.1093/nar/gkt1127 · DOI
  8. Meyer, 2014, Database of protein complexes with multivalent binding ability: Bival-bind, Proteins, 82, 744, 10.1002/prot.24453 · DOI
  9. Kooistra, 2014, KLIFS: A knowledge-based structural database to navigate Kinase–ligand interaction space, J. Med. Chem., 57, 249, 10.1021/jm400378w · DOI
  10. Desaphy, 2015, sc-PDB: A 3D-database of ligandable binding sites—10 years on, Nucleic Acids Res., 43, D399, 10.1093/nar/gku928 · DOI
  11. Bhagavat, 2018, An Augmented Pocketome: Detection and Analysis of Small-Molecule Binding Pockets in Proteins of Known 3D Structure, Structure, 26, 499, 10.1016/j.str.2018.02.001 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Wang, 2019, HKPocket: Human kinase pocket database for drug design, BMC Bioinform., 20, 1, 10.1186/s12859-019-3254-y · DOI
  13. Konc, 2021, ProBiS-Dock database: A web server and interactive web repository of small ligand–protein binding sites for drug design, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 61, 4097, 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00454 · DOI
  14. Radusky, 2014, TuberQ: A Mycobacterium tuberculosis protein druggability database, Database, 2014, bau035, 10.1093/database/bau035 · DOI
  15. Tseng, 2009, and Li, W-H. fPOP: Footprinting functional pockets of proteins by comparative spatial patterns, Nucleic Acids Res., 38, D288, 10.1093/nar/gkp900 · DOI
  16. Schreyer, 2009, CREDO: A protein–ligand interaction database for drug discovery, Chem. Biol. Drug. Des., 73, 157, 10.1111/j.1747-0285.2008.00762.x · DOI
  17. Bauer, 2008, SuperSite: Dictionary of metabolite and drug binding sites in proteins, Nucleic Acids Res., 37, D195, 10.1093/nar/gkn618 · DOI
  18. Dessailly, 2007, LigASite—a database of biologically relevant binding sites in proteins with known apo -structures, Nucleic Acids Res., 36, D667, 10.1093/nar/gkm839 · DOI
  19. Gold, 2006, SitesBase: A database for structure-based protein–ligand binding site comparisons, Nucleic Acids Res., 34, D231, 10.1093/nar/gkj062 · DOI
  20. Ivanisenko, 2005, PDBSite: A database of the 3D structure of protein functional sites, Nucleic Acids Res., 33, D183, 10.1093/nar/gki105 · DOI
  21. Yamaguchi, 2004, Het-PDB Navi.: A database for protein–small molecule interactions, J. Biochem., 135, 79, 10.1093/jb/mvh009 · DOI
  22. Hedderich, 2022, The pocketome of G-protein-coupled receptors reveals previously untargeted allosteric sites, Nat. Commun., 13, 2567, 10.1038/s41467-022-29609-6 · DOI
  23. Consortium, 2021, UniProt: The universal protein knowledgebase in 2021, Nucleic Acids Res., 49, D480, 10.1093/nar/gkaa1100 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Bonneau, 2001, Ab initio protein structure prediction: Progress and prospects, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct., 30, 173, 10.1146/annurev.biophys.30.1.173 · DOI
  25. Zhang, 2008, Progress and challenges in protein structure prediction, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 18, 342, 10.1016/j.sbi.2008.02.004 · DOI
  26. Yuan, 2013, Binding site detection and druggability prediction of protein targets for structure-based drug design, Curr. Pharm. Des., 19, 2326, 10.2174/1381612811319120019 · DOI
  27. Krasowski, 2011, DrugPred: A structure-based approach to predict protein druggability developed using an extensive nonredundant data set, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 51, 2829, 10.1021/ci200266d · DOI
  28. Ribeiro, 2014, The structure and regulation of human muscle α-actinin, Cell, 159, 1447, 10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.056 · DOI
  29. Yeturu, 2008, PocketMatch: A new algorithm to compare binding sites in protein structures, BMC Bioinform., 9, 1, 10.1186/1471-2105-9-543 · DOI
  30. Butina, 1999, Unsupervised data base clustering based on Daylight’s fingerprint and Tanimoto similarity: A fast and automated way To cluster small and large data sets, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 39, 747, 10.1021/ci9803381 · DOI
  31. Luginina, 2019, Structure-based mechanism of cysteinyl leukotriene receptor inhibition by antiasthmatic drugs, Sci. Adv., 5, eaax2518, 10.1126/sciadv.aax2518 · DOI
  32. Eberhardt, 2021, AutoDock Vina 1.2.0: New docking methods, expanded force field, and Python bindings, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 61, 3891, 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00203 · DOI
  33. Xu, 2018, CavityPlus: A web server for protein cavity detection with pharmacophore modelling, allosteric site identification and covalent ligand binding ability prediction, Nucleic Acids Res., 46, W374, 10.1093/nar/gky380 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Wang, S., Lin, H., Huang, Z., He, Y., Deng, X., Xu, Y., Pei, J., & Lai, L.
Affiliations
  • Peking University (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Pei, Jianfeng
  • Lai, Luhua
Venue
Biomolecules
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-07-11
Volume
12
Issue
7
Pages
967
ISSN
2218-273X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4285020367
Cited by
39
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5
FWCI
5.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biomolecules (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22033001, 2021-I2M-5-014)
  • the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (22033001, 2021-I2M-5-014)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
ligand binding sites, human proteome, protein binding site prediction, cavities, AlphaFold, protein structure prediction, protein function prediction, drug repurposing, structure-based drug design
MeSH terms
Binding Sites, Humans, Ligands, Protein Binding, Proteome, Biophysical Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review