The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sialyl-Tn in Cancer: (How) Did We Miss the Target?
Open accessAbstract
Sialyl-Tn antigen (STn) is a short O-glycan containing a sialic acid residue a2,6-linked to GalNAca-O-Ser/Thr. The biosynthesis of STn is mediated by a specific sialyltransferase termed ST6GalNAc I, which competes with O-glycans elongating glycosyltransferases and prevents cancer cells from exhibiting longer O-glycans. While weakly expressed by fetal and normal adult tissues, STn is expressed by more than 80% of human carcinomas and in all cases, STn detection is associated with adverse outcome and decreased overall survival for the patients. Because of its pan-carcinoma expression associated with an adverse outcome, an anti-cancer vaccine, named Theratope, has been designed towards the STn epitope. In spite of the great enthusiasm around this immunotherapy, Theratope failed on Phase III clinical trial. However, in lieu of missing this target, one should consider to revise the Theratope design and the actual facts. In this review, we highlight the many lessons that can be learned from this failure from the immunological standpoint, as well as from the drug design and formulation and patient selection. Moreover, an irrefutable knowledge is arising from novel immunotherapies targeting other carbohydrate antigens and STn carrier proteins, such as MUC1, that will warrantee the future development of more successful anti-STn immunotherapy strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lakshminarayanan, V., Thompson, P., Wolfert, M. A., Buskas, T., Bradley, J. M., Pathangey, L. B., Madsen, C. S., Cohen, P. A., Gendler, S. J., & Boons, G.-J. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1115166109 · Cited by 301
Cited by
Hallmarks of glycosylation in cancer
Munkley, J., & Elliott, D. J. (2016) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.8155 · Cited by 521
The tumour glyco-code as a novel immune checkpoint for immunotherapy
RodrÍguez, E., Schetters, S. T. T., & van Kooyk, Y. (2018) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri.2018.3 · Cited by 473
Metadata
- Authors
- Julien, S., Videira, P. A., & Delannoy, P.
- Venue
- Biomolecules
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2012-10-11
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 435-466
- ISSN
- 2218-273X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2012106289
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sialyl-Tn in Cancer: (How) Did We Miss the Target? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/biom2040435
- The paper
- Julien, S., Videira, P. A., & Delannoy, P. (2012). Sialyl-Tn in Cancer: (How) Did We Miss the Target? Biomolecules. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom2040435
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.