CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 0Cognitive Abilities and TestingEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 234 of the 234 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Great Debate

Open access
Harrison J. Kell, Jonas W. B. Lang·2019·MDPI eBooks
DOI 10.3390/books978-3-03921-168-5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

There are many different theories of intelligence. Although these theories differ in their nuances, nearly all agree that there are multiple cognitive abilities and that they differ in the breadth of content they are typically associated with. There is much less agreement about the relative importance of cognitive abilities of differing generality for predicting important real-world outcomes, such as educational achievement, career success, job performance, and health. Some investigators believe that narrower abilities hold little predictive power once general abilities have been accounted for. Other investigators contend that specific abilities are often as—or even more—effective in forecasting many practical variables as general abilities. These disagreements often turn on differences of theory and methodology that are both subtle and complex. The five cutting-edge contributions in this volume, both empirical and theoretical, advance the conversation in this vigorous, and highly important, scientific debate.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/books978-3-03921-168-5

Cites

234 of 234 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Items 201–234 of 234

Cited by

Still being checked.

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Kell, H. J., & Lang, J. W. B.
Affiliations
  • Educational Testing Service (US)
  • Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE)
ORCID
Venue
MDPI eBooks
Publisher
MDPI
Published
2019-07-26
DOI
10.3390/books978-3-03921-168-5
OpenAlex
W4231203069
Cited by
0
References
233
FWCI
0.00
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • MDPI eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Directory of Open access Books (OAPEN Foundation) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1620457)
  • Mensa Education and Research Foundation
  • Educational Testing Service
  • Vanderbilt University
  • Peabody College
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
Keywords
intelligence theory, general intelligence, specific abilities, cognitive ability, academic performance, career success, employee performance, health prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review