Cited by 41Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchTactile and Sensory InteractionsGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Noli Me Tangere: Social Touch, Tactile Defensiveness, and Communication in Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Open access
Smirni, Daniela, Smirni, Pietro, Carotenuto, Marco, Parisi, Lucia, Quatrosi, Giuseppe, Roccella, Michele·2019·Brain Sciences

Abstract

Tactile defensiveness is a common feature in neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). Since the first studies, tactile defensiveness has been described as the result of an abnormal response to sensory stimulation. Moreover, it has been studied how the tactile system is closely linked to socio-communicative development and how the interoceptive sensory system supports both a discriminating touch and an affective touch. Therefore, several neurophysiological studies have been conducted to investigate the neurobiological basis of the development and functioning of the tactile system for a better understanding of the tactile defensiveness behavior and the social touch of NDDs. Given the lack of recent literature on tactile defensiveness, the current study provides a brief overview of the original contributions on this research topic in children with NDDs focusing attention on how this behavior has been considered over the years in the clinical setting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/brainsci9120368

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tactile defensiveness can lead some autistic people to react physically, particularly when already anxious or overwhelmed.

    “Tactile defensiveness can lead some autistic people to react physically, particularly when already anxious or overwhelmed (Smirni et al, 2019; Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2020)”

    From Autistic SPACE: a novel framework for meeting the needs of autistic people in healthcare settings (2023) · cites this paper as Smirni et al, 2019

    The Introduction defines tactile defensiveness as avoidance, withdrawal, or hyperresponsivity to touch, and the Discussion describes children avoiding physical contact. Section 7 links tactile sensitivity in autism to emotional difficulties, but the paper does not establish that physical reactions are particularly likely when a person is already anxious or overwhelmed. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A gentle touch that might soothe a non-autistic person might be intolerable to an autistic person, leading to a defensive or aggressive reaction.

    “Where a non-autistic person might be soothed by a gentle touch, the same gesture might be intolerable to an autistic person, leading to a defensive or aggressive reaction (Smirni et al, 2019).”

    From Autistic SPACE: a novel framework for meeting the needs of autistic people in healthcare settings (2023) · cites this paper as Smirni et al, 2019

    The Introduction defines tactile defensiveness as avoidance or withdrawal from touch most people find non-threatening, and the Discussion says hyper-responsive children may overreact to ordinary touch. Section 6 describes gentle stroking as relaxing in a study of typically developing infants. These passages support the contrast and a defensive reaction, but not the claim that the touch may lead to aggression. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 85 · Cited by 41

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [45]Dunbar R. Dunbar R.I.M. Grooming, Gossip, and the Evolution of Language Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA, USA 1998 0674363361

Authors
Smirni, D., Smirni, P., Carotenuto, M., Parisi, L., Quatrosi, G., & Roccella, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Palermo (IT)
  • University of Catania (IT)
  • University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT)
  • Dipartimento Promozione della Salute, Materno-Infantile, di Medicina Interna e Specialistica di Eccellenza “G. D’Alessandro”, 90127 Palermo, Italy
Corresponding author
Smirni, Daniela
Venue
Brain Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-12-12
Volume
9
Issue
12
Pages
368
ISSN
2076-3425 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2995401133
Cited by
41
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7
FWCI
2.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS UniPA (University of Palermo) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
tactile defensiveness, social touch, neurodevelopmental disorders, sensory processing, interoception, affective touch, children

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review