Cited by 19Acoustic Wave Phenomena ResearchSpeech and Audio ProcessingNoise Effects and Management

On the Use of Perforated Sound Absorption Systems for Variable Acoustics Room Design

Open access
Pereira, Andreia, Gaspar, Anna, Godinho, Luís, Amado Mendes, Paulo, Mateus, Diogo, Carbajo, Jesus, Ramis, Jaime, Poveda, Pedro·2021·Buildings

Abstract

An important challenge for acoustic engineers in room acoustics design is related to the acoustic performance of multi-purpose auditoriums, which are typically designed to suit several performance requirements. With this intent, the analysis of several scenarios is usually performed individually, and then an acceptable solution, that may be adapted to several situations, is selected. One way of providing a more appropriate acoustic performance for each function of the auditorium is using variable sound absorption techniques to control reverberation and other relevant acoustic phenomena associated to sound perception. In this paper, the acoustic behavior of a perforated system that may be suitable for achieving a variable acoustic solution for room acoustic design is addressed. In the design of a cost-effective solution, the surface appearance is kept unchanged, while variable acoustic behavior is achieved either by closing the holes in the back face of the perforated panel or by placing a porous material in varying positions inside the backing cavity, thus accomplishing different acoustic requirements within a multipurpose auditorium. An analytical approach, based on the transfer matrix method is employed for preliminary acoustic sound absorption assessment provided by the system and to develop optimized solutions. Diffuse sound absorption is then computed and used to simulate, by the ray-tracing method, the acoustic behavior of a multipurpose auditorium to demonstrate efficient acoustic performance for different types of use.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/buildings11110543

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 25 · Cited by 19

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. Barron, M. Acoustics for multi-purpose use. In Auditorium Acoustics and Architectural Design, 2nd ed.; Spon Press: London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 385-408.
  2. Poletti, M.A. Active acoustic systems for the control of room acoustics. Build. Acoust. 2011, 18, 237-258.
  3. Thün, G.; Velikov, K.; Sauvé, L.; McGee, W. Design Ecologies for Responsive Environments: Resonant Chamber, an Acoustically Per- formative System; ACADIA 12; Synthetic Digital Ecologies: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2012. · DOI
  4. Everest, F.A.; Pohlmann, K.C. Adjustable Acoustics. In Master Handbook of Acoustics, 6th ed.; McGraw-Hills: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 375-390.
  5. Cairoli, M. Architectural customized design for variable acoustics in a multipurpose auditorium. Appl. Acoust. 2018, 140, 167- 177.
  6. Egan, M.D. Architectural Acoustics; J. Ross Publishing: Plantation, FL, USA, 2007; pp. 134-142. · DOI
  7. Beranek, L. Concert Halls and Opera Houses: Music, Acoustics, and Architecture, 2nd ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2004; pp. 549-550.
  8. Long, M. Architectural Acoustics; Elsevier Academic Press: Burlington, MA, USA, 2006; pp. 579, 653-657.
  9. Sadeghnia, G.R. Data-driven IoT-platform for optimizing variable acoustics in multifunctional performance spaces. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2019, 146, 2851-2851.
  10. Adelman-Larsen, N.W.; Thompson, E.R.; Gade, A.C. Suitable reverberation times for halls for rock and pop music. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2010, 127, 247-255. · DOI
  11. Adelman-Larsen, N.W. Rock and Pop Venues: Acoustic and Architectural Design; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 140-142. · DOI
  12. Kusaka, M.; Sakagami, K.; Okuzono, T.; Kido, S.; Yamaguchi, D. Three-dimensional MPP space absorbers: An overview of the project and recent development. In Proceedings of the Inter-Noise and Noise-Con Congress and Conference Proceedings, Seoul, Korea, 23-26 August 2020; Volume 261, pp. 358-368.
  13. Sakagami, K.; Kusaka, M.; Okuzono, T.; Kido, S.; Yamaguchi, D. Diffuse-field sound absorption characteristics of a spherical- microperforated space absorber. Acoust. Sci. Technol. 2020, 41, 784-787.
  14. Cox, T.; d'Antonio, P. Acoustic Absorbers and Diffusers: Theory, Design and Application, 3rd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2017; pp. 225-255. · DOI
  15. Vorländer, M. Auralization: Fundamentals of Acoustics, Modelling, Simulation, Algorithms and Acoustic Virtual Reality; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; pp. 181-196.
  16. Lo Turco, M.; Zich, U.; Astolfi, A.; Shtrepi, L.; Poaola, B. M. From digital design to physical model. Origami techniques applied to dynamic panelling shapes for acoustic performance control. In Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe, Rome, Italy, 20-22 September 2017.
  17. Pellegrino, S. Deployable Structure; Springer: Vienna, Austria, 2001.
  18. Kolarevic, B.; Peters, B.; Peters, T. Parametric Evolution, Inside Smart Geometry: Expanding the Architectural Possibilities of Computa- tional Design; Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2013.
  19. Bonfiglio, P.; Pompoli, F. Inversion problems for determining physical parameters of porous materials: Overview and compar- ison between different methods. Acta Acust. United Acust. 2013, 99, 341-351.
  20. Ramis, J.; Del Rey, R.; Alba, J.; Godinho, L.; Carbajo, J. A model for acoustic absorbent materials derived from coconut fiber. Mater. Construcción 2014, 64, e008.
  21. Barron, M. Acoustics for multi-purpose use. In Auditorium Acoustics and Architectural Design, 2nd ed.; Spon Press: London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 385-408.
  22. Poletti, M.A. Active acoustic systems for the control of room acoustics. Build. Acoust. 2011, 18, 237-258. [CrossRef] · DOI
  23. Everest, F.A.; Pohlmann, K.C. Adjustable Acoustics. In Master Handbook of Acoustics, 6th ed.; McGraw-Hills: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 375-390.
  24. Cairoli, M. Architectural customized design for variable acoustics in a multipurpose auditorium. Appl. Acoust. 2018, 140, 167-177. [CrossRef] · DOI
  25. Egan, M.D. Architectural Acoustics; J. Ross Publishing: Plantation, FL, USA, 2007; pp. 134-142.
  26. Beranek, L. Concert Halls and Opera Houses: Music, Acoustics, and Architecture, 2nd ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2004; pp. 549-550.
  27. Long, M. Architectural Acoustics; Elsevier Academic Press: Burlington, MA, USA, 2006; pp. 579, 653-657.
  28. Sadeghnia, G.R. Data-driven IoT-platform for optimizing variable acoustics in multifunctional performance spaces. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2019, 146, 2851. [CrossRef] · DOI
  29. Adelman-Larsen, N.W.; Thompson, E.R.; Gade, A.C. Suitable reverberation times for halls for rock and pop music. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2010, 127, 247-255. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  30. Adelman-Larsen, N.W. Rock and Pop Venues: Acoustic and Architectural Design; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 140-142.
  31. Kusaka, M.; Sakagami, K.; Okuzono, T.; Kido, S.; Yamaguchi, D. Three-dimensional MPP space absorbers: An overview of the project and recent development. In Proceedings of the Inter-Noise and Noise-Con Congress and Conference Proceedings, Seoul, Korea, 23-26 August 2020; Volume 261, pp. 358-368.
  32. Sakagami, K.; Kusaka, M.; Okuzono, T.; Kido, S.; Yamaguchi, D. Diffuse-field sound absorption characteristics of a spherical- microperforated space absorber. Acoust. Sci. Technol. 2020, 41, 784-787. [CrossRef] · DOI
  33. Cox, T.; d'Antonio, P. Acoustic Absorbers and Diffusers: Theory, Design and Application, 3rd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2017; pp. 225-255.
  34. Vorländer, M. Auralization: Fundamentals of Acoustics, Modelling, Simulation, Algorithms and Acoustic Virtual Reality; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; pp. 181-196.
  35. Lo Turco, M.; Zich, U.; Astolfi, A.; Shtrepi, L.; Poaola, B.M. From digital design to physical model. Origami techniques applied to dynamic panelling shapes for acoustic performance control. In Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe, Rome, Italy, 20-22 September 2017.
  36. Pellegrino, S. Deployable Structure; Springer: Vienna, Austria, 2001.
  37. Kolarevic, B.; Peters, B.; Peters, T. Parametric Evolution, Inside Smart Geometry: Expanding the Architectural Possibilities of Computa- tional Design; Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2013.
  38. Panneton, R. Comments on the limp frame equivalent fluid model for porous media. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2007, 122, EL217-EL222. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  39. Bonfiglio, P.; Pompoli, F. Inversion problems for determining physical parameters of porous materials: Overview and comparison between different methods. Acta Acust. United Acust. 2013, 99, 341-351. [CrossRef] · DOI
  40. Ramis, J.; Del Rey, R.; Alba, J.; Godinho, L.; Carbajo, J. A model for acoustic absorbent materials derived from coconut fiber. Mater. Construcción 2014, 64, e008. [CrossRef] · DOI
  41. Mechel, F.P. Formulas of Acoustics, 2nd ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; p. 796.
  42. Wu, M. Micro-Perforated Panels Duct Silencing. Noise Control Eng. J. 1997, 45, 69-77. [CrossRef] · DOI
  43. Larner, D.; Davy, J. The prediction of the diffuse field sound absorption of perforated panel systems. In Proceedings of the 44th InterNoise Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering, San Francisco, CA, USA, 9-12 August 2015.
  44. Rindel, J.H. The use of computer modelling in room acoustics. J. Vibroeng. 2000, 3, 219-224.
  45. Dance, S.M.; Van Buuren, G. Effects of damping on the low-frequency acoustics of listening rooms based on an analytical model. J. Sound Vib. 2013, 332, 6891-6904. [CrossRef] · DOI
  46. Isbert, A.C. Diseño Acústico de Espacios Arquitectónicos; Universidad Politécnica de Catalunya: Catalonia, Spain, 1998; pp. 34-35, 184.
  47. Arau, H. ABC de la Acústica Arquitectónica; CEAC: Barcelona, Spain, 1999; pp. 217-288.
  48. Rossing, T. Handbook of Acoustics; Springer Science & Business Media: New York, NY, USA, 2007; pp. 437-438.
  49. Beranek, L.L. Concert Halls and Opera Houses: How They Sound; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1996.
  50. Reichardt, W.; Alim, O.A.; Schmidt, W. Definition and basis of making an objective evaluation to distinguish between useful and useless clarity defining musical performances. Acta Acust. United Acust. 1975, 32, 126-137.

Authors
Pereira, A., Gaspar, A., Godinho, L., Amado Mendes, P., Mateus, D., Carbajo, J., Ramis, J., & Poveda, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Coimbra (PT)
  • Department of Civil Engineering, ISISE, University of Coimbra, 3030-788 Coimbra, Portugal
  • University of Alicante (ES)
  • System Engineering and Signal Theory, Department of Physics, University of Alicante, 03690 San Vicente del Raspeig, Spain
Corresponding author
Pereira, Andreia
Venue
Buildings
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-11-15
Volume
11
Issue
11
Pages
543
ISSN
2075-5309 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3211338904
Cited by
19
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Buildings (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Estudo Geral (Universidad de Coimbra) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RUA, Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Alicante (Universidad de Alicante) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Competitivity Factors Operational Programme - COMPETE (CENTRO-01-0247-FEDER-033884)
  • PIDDAC (UIDB / 04029/2020)
  • Regional Operational Programme CENTRO2020 (CENTRO-01-0145-FEDER-000006)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Noise Effects and Management
Keywords
perforated plates, room acoustics design, reverberation control, porous media, transfer matrix method, ray tracing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review