Cited by 0Heat Transfer and Boiling StudiesBuilding Energy and Comfort OptimizationPhase Change Materials Research

Heat Transfer Performance and On–Off Thermal Response of a Building Wall Embedded with a Reversible Loop Heat Pipe

Open access
Chen, Junxiang, Li, Yonghan, Wu, Huijun, Yang, Lixiu·2026·Buildings

Abstract

Building on a previously developed valve-controlled reversible loop heat pipe (RLHP) and the corresponding RLHP-embedded wall, component- and wall-scale experiments were conducted. The heat-transfer performance of the RLHP was evaluated at filling ratios of 10–70% and heating powers of 25–400 W, and its forward and reverse operation was evaluated at the component scale using a filling ratio of 50%. The on–off dynamic responses of the RLHP-embedded wall and a reference wall were subsequently compared under heating powers of 20–200 W. The results showed that filling ratios ranging from 40% to 70% provided a relatively effective operating range under the tested conditions. Among the tested filling ratios, 50% exhibited the lowest and most stable apparent equivalent thermal resistance, with an average value of approximately 0.039 m2·K/W. At 400 W, the quasi-steady average temperature differences during forward and reverse operation were 17.2 °C and 16.9 °C, respectively. At 200 W, the first-hour temperature rise on the unheated side was approximately 6 °C for the RLHP-embedded wall, compared with 1.2 °C for the reference wall. During the combined heating-off–valve-closed stage, the heat-retention duration increased with the preceding heating power.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/buildings16163165

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38

Authors
Chen, J., Li, Y., Wu, H., & Yang, L.
Affiliations
  • Guangzhou University (CN)
  • School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
Venue
Buildings
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2026-08-09
Volume
16
Issue
16
Pages
3165
ISSN
2075-5309 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7202076396
Cited by
0
References
38
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Buildings (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (52378092)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Boiling Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Phase Change Materials Research
Keywords
building walls, heat transfer performance, filling factor, equivalent thermal resistance, heat retention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review