The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of Copper Chelation on BRAFV600E Positive Colon Carcinoma Cells
Open accessAbstract
High affinity copper binding to mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1 (MAP2K1, also known as MEK1) allosterically promotes the kinase activity of MEK1/2 on extracellular signal regulated kinases 1 and 2 (ERK1/2). Consequently, copper-dependent activation of the mitogen-activated (MAP) kinase pathway has a role in promoting tumor growth. Conversely, copper chelation may represent a possible therapeutic approach for a specific subset of tumors characterized by activating mutations in the serine/threonine protein kinase V-Raf Murine Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog B1 (BRAF), such as the V600E, occurring within the kinase domain (BRAFV600E). Tetrathiomolybdate (TM) is a specific copper chelating agent currently used for the treatment of Wilson’s disease and in preclinical studies for the management of metastatic cancers owing to its anti-angiogenic and anti-inflammatory properties. We evaluated in vitro and in vivo the effects of copper depletion achieved by pharmacological treatment with TM in human colorectal cells bearing the BRAFV600E mutation in comparison with BRAF wild type cells. We provide evidence that selective copper chelation differentially affects proliferation, survival and migration of colon cancer cells bearing the BRAFV600E mutation compared to BRAFwt acting via differential phosphorylation levels of ERK1/2. Moreover, tetrathiomolybdate treatment was also effective in reducing the clonogenic potential of colon cancer BRAFV600E cells resistant to BRAF pharmacological inhibition. In conclusion, these results support further assessment of copper chelation therapy as an adjuvant therapy for inhibiting the progression of colon cancers containing the BRAFV600E mutation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer
Davies, H., Bignell, G. R., Cox, C., Stephens, P., Edkins, S., Clegg, S., Teague, J., Woffendin, H., Garnett, M. J., Bottomley, W., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00766 · Cited by 10,674
Improved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation
Chapman, P. B., Hauschild, A., Robert, C., Haanen, J. B., Ascierto, P., Larkin, J., Dummer, R., Garbe, C., Testori, A., Maio, M., et al. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1103782 · Cited by 7,720 · cited 1×
“Inhibition of the BRAF oncoprotein by vemurafenib has been shown to be highly effective in BRAFV600E melanoma patients [22]; in contrast, the same treatment has limited effect on BRAFV600E colon cancer patients due to intrinsic resistance against BRAF inhibitors [6,23].”
BackgroundIn vitro scratch assay: a convenient and inexpensive method for analysis of cell migration in vitro
Liang, C.-C., Park, A. Y., & Guan, J.-L. (2007) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.30 · Cited by 4,696
Vinci, M., Gowan, S., Boxall, F., Patterson, L., Zimmermann, M., Court, W., Lomas, C., Mendiola, M., Hardisson, D., & Eccles, S. A. (2012) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/1741-7007-10-29 · Cited by 1,024
Phase II Pilot Study of Vemurafenib in Patients With Metastatic BRAF -Mutated Colorectal Cancer
Kopetz, S., Desai, J., Chan, E., Hecht, J. R., O'Dwyer, P. J., Maru, D., Morris, V., Janku, F., Dasari, A., Chung, W., et al. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2015.63.2497 · Cited by 697
Cited by
The interplay of ROS and the PI3K/Akt pathway in autophagy regulation
Kma, L., & Baruah, T. J. (2022) · Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry · doi:10.1002/bab.2104 · Cited by 394
MDM2/X inhibitors as radiosensitizers for glioblastoma targeted therapy
Miles, X., Vandevoorde, C., Hunter, A., & Bolcaen, J. (2021) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.703442 · Cited by 40
Oncology and Pharmacogenomics Insights in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: An Integrative Analysis
Yumiceba, V., López-Cortés, A., Pérez-Villa, A., Yumiseba, I., Guerrero, S., García-Cárdenas, J. M., Armendáriz-Castillo, I., Guevara-Ramírez, P., Leone, P. E., Zambrano, A. K., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2020.585130 · Cited by 40
Pandey, S., Patil, S., Ballav, N., & Basu, S. (2020) · Journal of Materials Chemistry B · doi:10.1039/d0tb00408a · Cited by 26
Epigenetic memories and the evolution of infectious diseases
McLeod, D. V., Wild, G., & Úbeda, F. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24580-0 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Baldari, S., Di Rocco, G., Heffern, M. C., Su, T. A., Chang, C. J., & Toietta, G.
- Venue
- Cancers
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2019-05-12
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 659
- ISSN
- 2072-6694 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2943955737
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 11.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Copper Chelation on BRAFV600E Positive Colon Carcinoma Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/cancers11050659
- The paper
- Baldari, S., Di Rocco, G., Heffern, M. C., Su, T. A., Chang, C. J., & Toietta, G. (2019). Effects of Copper Chelation on BRAFV600E Positive Colon Carcinoma Cells. Cancers. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11050659
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.