BRAF Mutations Classes I, II, and III in NSCLC Patients Included in the SLLIP Trial: The Need for a New Pre-Clinical Treatment Rationale
Open accessAbstract
BRAF V600 mutations have been found in 1–2% of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved treatment of dabrafenib plus trametinib and progression free survival (PFS) of 10.9 months. However, 50–80% of BRAF mutations in lung cancer are non-V600, and can be class II, with intermediate to high kinase activity and RAS independence, or class III, with impaired kinase activity, upstream signaling dependence, and consequently, sensitivity to receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) inhibitors. Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) of 185 newly diagnosed advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients (Spanish Lung Liquid versus Invasive Biopsy Program, SLLIP, NCT03248089) was examined for BRAF and other alterations with a targeted cfDNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay (Guardant360®, Guardant Health Inc., CA, USA), and results were correlated with patient outcome. Cell viability with single or combined RAF, MEK, and SHP2 inhibitors was assessed in cell lines with BRAF class I, II, and III mutations. Out of 185 patients, 22 had BRAF alterations (12%) of which seven patients harbored amplifications (32%) and 17 had BRAF mutations (77%). Of the BRAF mutations, four out of 22 (18%) were V600E and 18/22 (82%) were non-V600. In vitro results confirmed sensitivity of class III and resistance of class I and II BRAF mutations, and BRAF wild type cells to SHP2 inhibition. Concomitant MEK or RAF and SHP2 inhibition showed synergistic effects, especially in the class III BRAF-mutant cell line. Our study indicates that the class of the BRAF mutation may have clinical implications and therefore should be defined in the clinical practice and used to guide therapeutic decisions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
BRAF activating mutations have been classified into three groups defined by their functional effects on the protein product, which consequently determines their response to different inhibitors.
“BRAF activating mutations have been classified into three groups defined by their functional effects on the protein product80,81, which consequently determines their response to different inhibitors82,83”
From The origins and genetic interactions of KRAS mutations are allele- and tissue-specific (2021) · cites this paper as [83]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19 · Cited by 67
- Authors
- Bracht, J. W. P., Karachaliou, N., Bivona, T., Lanman, R. B., Faull, I., Nagy, R. J., Drozdowskyj, A., Berenguer, J., Fernandez-Bruno, M., Molina-Vila, M. A., & Rosell, R.
- Affiliations
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
- Instituto Oncológico Dr. Rosell (ES)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Guardant (United States) (US)
- Pivotal (Spain) (ES)
- Pangaea Oncology, Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Quirón-Dexeus University Institute, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
- Instituto Oncológico Rosell (IOR), University Hospital Sagrat Cor, QuironSalud Group, 08029 Barcelona, Spain
- Institut d'Investigació en Ciències de la Salut Germans Trias i Pujol (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Bracht, Jillian Wilhelmina Paulina
- Rosell, Rafael
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cancers
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2019-09-17
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1381
- ISSN
- 2072-6694 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6770188
- OpenAlex
- W2974805185
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 7.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- dx.doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cancers (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (765492)
- European Union’s Horizon 2020 TECNIO Spring (712949)
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III (RESPONSE- PIE16/00011, PI14/01678)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Keywords
- BRAF mutation, non-small cell lung cancer, BRAF V600E mutation, plasma cell-free DNA, liquid biopsy, lung adenocarcinoma, RAF inhibitors, MEK inhibitors, SHP2 inhibition, dabrafenib plus trametinib, combination therapy, drug resistance, targeted therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review