Cited by 16Cancer, Hypoxia, and MetabolismPI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancerCancer, Lipids, and Metabolism

In situ metabolic Characterisation of Breast Cancer and its Potential Impact on Therapy

Open access
Petővári, Gábor, Dankó, Titanilla, Tőkés, Anna-Mária, Vetlényi, Enikő, Krencz, Ildikó, Raffay, Regina, Hajdu, Melinda, Sztankovics, Dániel +5 more·2020·Cancers

Abstract

In spite of tremendous developments in breast cancer treatment, the relatively high incidence of relapsing cases indicates a great need to find new therapeutic strategies in recurrent, metastatic and advanced cases. The bioenergetic needs of growing tumours at the primary site or in metastases-accumulating genomic alterations and further heterogeneity-are supported by metabolic rewiring, an important hallmark of cancer. Adaptation mechanisms as well as altered anabolic and catabolic processes balance according to available nutrients, energy, oxygen demand and overgrowth or therapeutic resistance. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) hyperactivity may contribute to this metabolic plasticity and progression in breast carcinomas. We set out to assess the metabolic complexity in breast cancer cell lines and primary breast cancer cases. Cellular metabolism and mTOR-related protein expression were characterised in ten cell lines, along with their sensitivity to specific mTOR and other metabolic inhibitors. Selected immunohistochemical reactions were performed on ~100 surgically removed breast cancer specimens. The obtained protein expression scores were correlated with survival and other clinicopathological data. Metabolic and mTOR inhibitor mono-treatments had moderate antiproliferative effects in the studied cell lines in a subtype-independent manner, revealing their high adaptive capacity and survival/growth potential. Immunohistochemical analysis of p-S6, Rictor, lactate dehydrogenase A, glutaminase, fatty acid synthase and carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1A in human samples identified high mTOR activity and potential metabolic plasticity as negative prognostic factors for breast cancer patients, even in subtypes generally considered as low-risk. According to our results, breast cancer is characterised by considerable metabolic diversity, which can be targeted by combining antimetabolic treatments and recent therapies. Alterations in these pathways may provide novel targets for future drug development in breast cancer. We also propose a set of immunostainings for scoring metabolic heterogeneity in individual cases in order to select patients who may benefit from more accurate follow-up and specific therapies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/cancers12092492

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • mTOR inhibitors could inhibit tumor progression as having a complex modifying role on metabolism.

    “mTOR inhibitors could inhibit tumor progression as having a complex modifying role on metabolism [108–113].”

    From Hypoxia Signaling in Cancer: From Basics to Clinical Practice (2021) · cites this paper as [109]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 61 · Cited by 16

Authors
Petővári, G., Dankó, T., Tőkés, A.-M., Vetlényi, E., Krencz, I., Raffay, R., Hajdu, M., Sztankovics, D., Németh, K., Vellai-Takács, K., Jeney, A., Kulka, J., & Sebestyén, A.
Affiliations
  • Semmelweis University (HU)
  • 2nd Department of Pathology, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 93, H-1091 Budapest, Hungary
  • 1st Department of Pathology and Experimental Cancer Research, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 26, H-1085 Budapest, Hungary
  • HUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences (HU)
  • Department of Biological Anthropology, Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/A, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary
Corresponding author
Sebestyén, Anna
Venue
Cancers
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-09-03
Volume
12
Issue
9
Pages
2492
ISSN
2072-6694 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3082110059
Cited by
16
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancers (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Nemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal (NKFI-FK-128404)
  • New National Excellence Program of the Ministry of Human Capacities (ÚNKP-19-3-1/3.)
  • National Research, Development and Innovation Fund of Hungary, National Bionics Program (ED_17-1-2017-0009)
  • Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Office (NKFIH) (NVKP_16-1-2016-0004)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
Keywords
breast cancer, cancer metabolism, metabolic reprogramming, mTOR signaling, metabolic plasticity, metabolic inhibitors, prognostic factors, treatment resistance, Rictor, LDHA, glutaminase, fatty acid synthase, CPT1A, breast cancer cell lines, patient selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review