Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 292

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Novel Transfer Learning Approach for Medical Imaging with Limited Labeled Data

Open access
Alzubaidi, Laith, Al-Amidie, Muthana, Al-Asadi, Ahmed, Humaidi, Amjad J., Al-Shamma, Omran, Fadhel, Mohammed A., Zhang, Jinglan, Santamaría, J., Duan, Ye·2021·Cancers

Abstract

Deep learning requires a large amount of data to perform well. However, the field of medical image analysis suffers from a lack of sufficient data for training deep learning models. Moreover, medical images require manual labeling, usually provided by human annotators coming from various backgrounds. More importantly, the annotation process is time-consuming, expensive, and prone to errors. Transfer learning was introduced to reduce the need for the annotation process by transferring the deep learning models with knowledge from a previous task and then by fine-tuning them on a relatively small dataset of the current task. Most of the methods of medical image classification employ transfer learning from pretrained models, e.g., ImageNet, which has been proven to be ineffective. This is due to the mismatch in learned features between the natural image, e.g., ImageNet, and medical images. Additionally, it results in the utilization of deeply elaborated models. In this paper, we propose a novel transfer learning approach to overcome the previous drawbacks by means of training the deep learning model on large unlabeled medical image datasets and by next transferring the knowledge to train the deep learning model on the small amount of labeled medical images. Additionally, we propose a new deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) model that combines recent advancements in the field. We conducted several experiments on two challenging medical imaging scenarios dealing with skin and breast cancer classification tasks. According to the reported results, it has been empirically proven that the proposed approach can significantly improve the performance of both classification scenarios. In terms of skin cancer, the proposed model achieved an F1-score value of 89.09% when trained from scratch and 98.53% with the proposed approach. Secondly, it achieved an accuracy value of 85.29% and 97.51%, respectively, when trained from scratch and using the proposed approach in the case of the breast cancer scenario. Finally, we concluded that our method can possibly be applied to many medical imaging problems in which a substantial amount of unlabeled image data is available and the labeled image data is limited. Moreover, it can be utilized to improve the performance of medical imaging tasks in the same domain. To do so, we used the pretrained skin cancer model to train on feet skin to classify them into two classes—either normal or abnormal (diabetic foot ulcer (DFU)). It achieved an F1-score value of 86.0% when trained from scratch, 96.25% using transfer learning, and 99.25% using double-transfer learning.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/cancers13071590

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 62 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Jeon, H.K., Kim, S., Edwin, J., and Yang, C.S. (2020). Sea Fog Identification From GOCI Images Using CNN Transfer Learning Models. Electronics, 9. · doi:10.3390/electronics9020311
  2. Xie, 2019, Dual network architecture for few-view CT-trained on ImageNet data and transferred for medical imaging, Developments in X-ray Tomography XII, Volume 11113, 111130V
  3. Neyshabur, B., Sedghi, H., and Zhang, C. (2020). What is being transferred in transfer learning?. arXiv.
  4. Heker, M., and Greenspan, H. (2020). Joint liver lesion segmentation and classification via transfer learning. arXiv.
  5. Gutman, D., Codella, N.C., Celebi, E., Helba, B., Marchetti, M., Mishra, N., and Halpern, A. (2016). Skin lesion analysis toward melanoma detection: A challenge at the international symposium on biomedical imaging (ISBI) 2016, hosted by the international skin imaging collaboration (ISIC). arXiv.
  6. Karki, S., Kulkarni, P., and Stranieri, A. (2021, January 1). Melanoma classification using EfficientNets and Ensemble of models with different input resolution. Proceedings of the 2021 Australasian Computer Science Week Multiconference, Dunedin, New Zealand. · doi:10.1145/3437378.3437396
  7. Sarker, M.I., Kim, H., Tarasov, D., and Akhmetzanov, D. (2019). Inception Architecture and Residual Connections in Classification of Breast Cancer Histology Images. arXiv.

Cited by

See all 292

Metadata

Authors
Alzubaidi, L., Al-Amidie, M., Al-Asadi, A., Humaidi, A. J., Al-Shamma, O., Fadhel, M. A., Zhang, J., Santamaría, J., & Duan, Y.
Venue
Cancers
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-03-30
Volume
13
Issue
7
Pages
1590
ISSN
2072-6694 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3148908072
Cited by
292
References
62
FWCI
17.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Novel Transfer Learning Approach for Medical Imaging with Limited Labeled Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/cancers13071590
The paper
Alzubaidi, L., Al-Amidie, M., Al-Asadi, A., Humaidi, A. J., Al-Shamma, O., Fadhel, M. A., Zhang, J., Santamaría, J., & Duan, Y. (2021). Novel Transfer Learning Approach for Medical Imaging with Limited Labeled Data. Cancers. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13071590

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.