Cited by 3Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization StudiesNanomaterials for catalytic reactionsCatalysis for Biomass Conversion

Size-Dependent Strong Metal-Support Interactions in Ni/Anatase TiO2 Catalysts for Selective Guaiacol Hydrodeoxygenation

Open access
Zhang, Xiaoqiang, Wang, Quanlei, Ren, Junli, Li, Huixiang, Gao, Da-Ming·2026·Catalysts

Abstract

Strong metal–support interactions (SMSI) are widely recognized as a powerful strategy for tuning catalytic selectivity and stability. However, a clear understanding of how controllable parameters govern SMSI strength and its impact on reaction pathways remains limited. In this work, the effect of hydrogen pretreatment temperature and Ni particle size on the SMSI behavior of Ni/TiO2-A catalysts and their catalytic performance in guaiacol hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) was systematically investigated. The results reveal a size-dependent SMSI behavior governed by the degree of metal encapsulation: small Ni particles (1–2 nm) are fully encapsulated by TiOx species, leading to suppression of aromatic ring hydrogenation, whereas larger Ni particles (~15 nm) are partially covered and retain aromatic hydrogenation activity. At 600 °C reduction, nearly complete Ni coverage suppresses aromatic hydrogenation sites, leading to selective formation of phenolic compounds. This study highlights that Ni particle size and reduction conditions jointly control SMSI strength, which in turn governs the catalyst activity and selectivity, providing guidance for rational design of SMSI catalysts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/catal16020175

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 3

Authors
Zhang, X., Wang, Q., Ren, J., Li, H., & Gao, D.-M.
Affiliations
  • Changzhou University (CN)
  • South China University of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Li, Huixiang
  • Gao, Da-Ming
Venue
Catalysts
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2026-02-08
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
175
ISSN
2073-4344 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7128366432
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3
FWCI
5.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Catalysts (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (22372014)
  • State Key Laboratory of Advanced Papermaking and Paper-based Materials (202502)
  • Changzhou Sci&Tech Program (CQ20240111, CQ20230091, CJ20250032, CJ20241088)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Catalysis for Biomass Conversion
Keywords
strong metal-support interaction, nickel catalysts, anatase TiO2, particle size effects, metal encapsulation, aromatic ring hydrogenation, phenolic compounds, selective catalysis, reduction conditions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review