The DOI matches its Crossref record; 249 of the 249 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ERK: A Double-Edged Sword in Cancer. ERK-Dependent Apoptosis as a Potential Therapeutic Strategy for Cancer
Open accessAbstract
The RAF/MEK/ERK signaling pathway regulates diverse cellular processes as exemplified by cell proliferation, differentiation, motility, and survival. Activation of ERK1/2 generally promotes cell proliferation, and its deregulated activity is a hallmark of many cancers. Therefore, components and regulators of the ERK pathway are considered potential therapeutic targets for cancer, and inhibitors of this pathway, including some MEK and BRAF inhibitors, are already being used in the clinic. Notably, ERK1/2 kinases also have pro-apoptotic functions under certain conditions and enhanced ERK1/2 signaling can cause tumor cell death. Although the repertoire of the compounds which mediate ERK activation and apoptosis is expanding, and various anti-cancer compounds induce ERK activation while exerting their anti-proliferative effects, the mechanisms underlying ERK1/2-mediated cell death are still vague. Recent studies highlight the importance of dual-specificity phosphatases (DUSPs) in determining the pro- versus anti-apoptotic function of ERK in cancer. In this review, we will summarize the recent major findings in understanding the role of ERK in apoptosis, focusing on the major compounds mediating ERK-dependent apoptosis. Studies that further define the molecular targets of these compounds relevant to cell death will be essential to harnessing these compounds for developing effective cancer treatments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Han, M., Gao, H. Y., Ju, P., Gao, M., Yuan, Y., Chen, X., Liu, K.-L., Han, Y., & Han, Z. (2018) · Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2018.04.014 · Cited by 95
RetractedHanahan, D., & Weinberg, R. A. (2000) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81683-9 · Cited by 29,219
Repertoires of Autophagy in the Pathogenesis of Ocular Diseases
Li, Y.-J., Jiang, Q., Cao, G.-F., Yao, J., & Yan, B. (2015) · Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1159/000373980 · Cited by 16,304
Apoptosis: A Review of Programmed Cell Death
Elmore, S. (2007) · Toxicologic Pathology · doi:10.1080/01926230701320337 · Cited by 13,853
Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer
Davies, H., Bignell, G. R., Cox, C., Stephens, P., Edkins, S., Clegg, S., Teague, J., Woffendin, H., Garnett, M. J., Bottomley, W., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00766 · Cited by 10,674
p53, the cellular gatekeeper for growth and division
Levine, A. J. (1997) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81871-1 · Cited by 7,693
Autophagy in the Pathogenesis of Disease
Levine, B., & Kroemer, G. (2008) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.12.018 · Cited by 7,069
COSMIC: the Catalogue Of Somatic Mutations In Cancer
Tate, J. G., Bamford, S., Jubb, H. C., Sondka, Z., Beare, D. M., Bindal, N., Boutselakis, H., Cole, C. G., Creatore, C., Dawson, E., et al. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky1015 · Cited by 4,867
Autophagy and Viruses: Adversaries or Allies?
Dong, X., & Levine, B. (2013) · Journal of Innate Immunity · doi:10.1159/000346388 · Cited by 4,430
Activation and function of the MAPKs and their substrates, the MAPK-activated protein kinases
Cargnello, M., & Roux, P. P. (2011) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00031-10 · Cited by 3,274
Cited by
Apoptosis in Alzheimer’s disease: Insight into the signaling pathways and therapeutic avenues
Kumari, S., Dhapola, R., & Reddy, D. H. (2023) · Apoptosis · doi:10.1007/s10495-023-01848-y · Cited by 324
The Angiotensin AT2 Receptor: From a Binding Site to a Novel Therapeutic Target
Steckelings, U. M., Widdop, R. E., Sturrock, E. D., Lubbe, L., Hussain, T., Kaschina, E., Unger, T., Hallberg, A., Carey, R. M., & Sumners, C. (2022) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pharmrev.120.000281 · Cited by 97
MAPKs in the early steps of senescence implemEMTation
Anerillas, C., Altés, G., & Gorospe, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2023.1083401 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Sugiura, R., Satoh, R., & Takasaki, T.
- Venue
- Cells
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2021-09-22
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2509
- ISSN
- 2073-4409 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3199076451
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 249
- FWCI
- 13.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ERK: A Double-Edged Sword in Cancer. ERK-Dependent Apoptosis as a Potential Therapeutic Strategy for Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/cells10102509
- The paper
- Sugiura, R., Satoh, R., & Takasaki, T. (2021). ERK: A Double-Edged Sword in Cancer. ERK-Dependent Apoptosis as a Potential Therapeutic Strategy for Cancer. Cells. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10102509
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.