Enhancing Proton Therapy Efficacy Through Nanoparticle-Mediated Radiosensitization
Open accessAbstract
Proton therapy, characterized by its unique Bragg peak, offers the potential to optimize the destruction of cancer cells while sparing healthy tissues, positioning it as one of the most advanced cancer treatment modalities currently available. However, in comparison to heavy ions, protons exhibit a relatively lower relative biological effectiveness (RBE), which limits the efficacy of proton therapy. The incorporation of nanoparticles for radiosensitization presents a novel approach to enhance the RBE of protons. This review provides a comprehensive discussion of the recent advancements in augmenting the biological effects of proton therapy through the use of nanoparticles. It examines the various types of nanoparticles that have been the focus of extensive research, elucidates their mechanisms of radiation sensitization, and evaluates the factors influencing the efficiency of this sensitization process. Furthermore, this review discusses the latest synergistic therapeutic strategies that integrate nanoparticle-mediated radiosensitization and outlines prospective directions for the future application of nanoparticles in conjunction with proton therapy.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
High-Z nanoparticles enhance ROS generation by increasing local energy deposition and secondary electron emission, thereby amplifying free radical formation and oxidative stress following irradiation.
“High-Z nanoparticles enhance ROS generation by increasing local energy deposition and secondary electron emission, thereby amplifying free radical formation and oxidative stress following irradiation [9,10,86,88,102,103].”
From Nanoparticle-Mediated Radiosensitization in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review of Preclinical Evidence and Translational Challenges (2026) · cites this paper as [103]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 144 · Cited by 23
- Authors
- Ma, J., Shen, H., & Mi, Z.
- Affiliations
- Fudan University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Mi, Zhaohong
- Venue
- Cells
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2024-11-07
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 1841
- ISSN
- 2073-4409 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11593106
- OpenAlex
- W4404147111
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 144
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 1.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cells (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (12205053, 2023YFA1607000)
- National Key R&D Program of China (12205053, 2023YFA1607000)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Keywords
- proton therapy, radiosensitization, nanoparticles, relative biological effectiveness, Bragg peak, cancer radiotherapy
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Humans, Neoplasms, Radiation-Sensitizing Agents, Nanoparticles, Proton Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review