Cited by 60Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesAdvanced ceramic materials synthesisAdditive Manufacturing Materials and Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Influence of Printing Parameters, Post-Processing, and Testing Conditions on the Properties of Binder Jetting Additive Manufactured Functional Ceramics

Open access

Abstract

This article outlines the current state-of-the-art binder jetting (BJT) additive manufacturing of functional ceramics. The impact of printing parameters, heat treatment processing, and testing conditions on the observed performance of these ceramics is discussed. Additionally, this article discusses the impact of physical properties such as density and mechanical strength on the overall performance of these functional ceramics. Although printing parameters and initial feedstock are crucial for the printability of the desired parts, other factors play an important role in the performance of the ceramic. Thermal post-processing is crucial to achieve optimized functional properties, while the testing orientation is key to obtaining the maximum output from the part. Finally, future research directions for this field are also discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ceramics3010008

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Wang, F.F.Y. (2016). Ceramic Fabrication Processes: Treatise on Materials Science and Technology, Elsevier.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chavez, L. A., Ibave, P., Wilburn, B., Alexander, D., Stewart, C., Wicker, R., & Lin, Y.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at El Paso (US)
  • Los Alamos National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Chavez, Luis A.
Venue
Ceramics
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-02-19
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
65-77
ISSN
2571-6131 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3007136980
Cited by
60
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5
FWCI
3.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ceramics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Department of Energy (DE-FE-0027502, DE-NA-0003865)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Ceramics and Composites › Advanced ceramic materials synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Keywords
binder jetting, functional ceramics, additive manufacturing, printing parameters, heat treatment, thermal post-processing, density, mechanical strength, printability, ceramic feedstock

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review