Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 18

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Characterizing and Quantifying Water Content in 14 Species of Bryophytes Present in Azorean Native Vegetation

Coelho, Márcia C. M., Gabriel, Rosalina, Ah-Peng, Claudine·2023·Diversity

Abstract

Bryophytes are an important component of plant diversity, may be found from sea level to mountaintops, and are particularly conspicuous on the Azores islands. These plants rely on environmental water, which acquires intercepting rain and dew (liquid water) and uses fog (water vapor), and transports both externally, by capillary forces, and internally, in different cells (specialized or not). This study characterizes and quantifies the ability of six liverworts and eight mosses to retain water, through different pathways, and to lose water by evaporation. Twelve replicates of each species were collected in Azorean native vegetation during the summer of 2016. The absolute water content (AWC) was obtained through measurements of specimens saturated, without free water, and completely dry. Most of the 14-target species showed an ectohydric behavior pattern retaining more than 60% of water through gametophyte surface. The AWC value ranged from 646% in Polytrichum commune to 5584% in Sphagnum subnitens. The water loss by direct evaporation showed, for most of species, an exponential decay curve along time. Understanding how much native bryophytes, acquire, store, and release water into the system contributes not only to the knowledge of native vegetation resilience but also to potential impacts on the availability and quality of water—a major ecosystem service performed by bryophytes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/d15020295

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 18

Research works printed but not linked: 60

  1. Bowen, 1933, The Mechanism of Water Conduction in the Musci considered in Relation to Habitat. II. Mosses growing in damp situations, Ann. Bot., 47, 635, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a090406 · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a090406
  2. Proctor, 2002, Poikilohydry and homoihydry: Antithesis or spectrum of possibilities?, New Phytol., 156, 327, 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00526.x · DOI · Paper page
  3. Kappen, 2007, Opportunistic Growth and Desiccation Tolerance: The Ecological Success of Poikilohydrous Autotrophs, Funct. Plant Ecol., 2, 7, 10.1201/9781420007626-2 · DOI
  4. Lüttge, U., Beck, E., and Bartels, D. (2011). Plant Desiccation Tolerance, Ecological Studies; Springer. · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-19106-0
  5. Tuba, 1996, Photosynthetic responses of a moss, Tortula ruralis, ssp. ruralis, and the lichens Cladonia convoluta and C. furcata to water deficit and short periods of desiccation, and their ecophysiological significance: A baseline study at present-day CO2 concentrat, New Phytol., 133, 353, 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb01902.x · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb01902.x
  6. Smith, A.G.E. (1982). Bryophyte Ecology, Chapman and Hall. · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-5891-3
  7. Goffinet, B., and Shaw, A.J. (2009). Bryophyte Biology, Cambridge University Press. · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511754807
  8. Lange, O.L., Nobel, P.S., Osmond, C., and Ziegler, C. (1982). Physiological Plant Ecology II—Water Relations and Carbon Assimilation, Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology. · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-68150-9
  9. Guerra, 1992, On the degree of adaptation of the moss flora and vegetation in gypsiferous zones of the south-east Iberian Peninsula, J. Bryol., 17, 133, 10.1179/jbr.1992.17.1.133 · doi:10.1179/jbr.1992.17.1.133
  10. Elumeeva, 2011, The importance of colony structure versus shoot morphology for the water balance of 22 subarctic bryophyte species, J. Veg. Sci., 22, 152, 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2010.01237.x · doi:10.1111/j.1654-1103.2010.01237.x
  11. Dilks, 1979, Photosynthesis Respiration and Water Content in Bryophytes, New Phytol. J., 82, 97, 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1979.tb07564.x · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1979.tb07564.x
  12. Noakes, 1988, Pathways of water movement in relation to structure and micromorphology in Antarctic mosses, Polarforschun, 58, 125
  13. Proctor, 2000, The bryophyte paradox: Tolerance of desiccation, evasion of drought, Plant Ecol., 151, 41, 10.1023/A:1026517920852 · doi:10.1023/a:1026517920852
  14. Proctor, 1998, Water-content components in bryophytes: Analysis of pressure-volume curves, J. Exp. Bot., 49, 1845, 10.1093/jxb/49.328.1845 · doi:10.1093/jxb/49.328.1845
  15. Ingrouille, M. (1992). Diversity and Evolution of Land Plants, Chapman and Hall. · DOI
  16. Holdgate, M.W. (1970). Antarctic Ecology, Academic Press.
  17. Longton, 1979, Studies on growth, reproduction and population ecology in relation to microclimate in the bipolar moss Polytrichum alpestre Hoppe, Bryologist, 82, 325, 10.2307/3242212 · doi:10.2307/3242212
  18. Rundel, 1980, Water relations and photosynthetic response of a desert moss, Flora, 169, 329, 10.1016/S0367-2530(17)31962-X · doi:10.1016/s0367-2530(17)31962-x
  19. Bruijnzeel, L.A., Scatena, F.F.N., and Hamilton, L.S. (2010). Tropical Montane Cloud Forests: Science for Conservation and Management, Cambridge University Press. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Hajek, 2008, Effect of Water Content Components on Desiccation and Recovery in Sphagnum Mosses, Ann. Bot., 101, 165, 10.1093/aob/mcm287 · DOI
  21. Schofield, 1981, Ecological significance of morphological characters in the moss gametophyte, Bryologist, 84, 149, 10.2307/3242819 · doi:10.2307/3242819
  22. Zotz, 2000, Water relations and carbon gain are closely related to cushion size in the moss Grimmia pulvinata, New Phytol., 148, 59, 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00745.x · DOI
  23. Fowbert, 1996, An experimental study of growth in relation to morphology and shoot water content in maritime Antarctic mosses, New Phytol., 133, 363, 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb01903.x · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb01903.x
  24. Robroek, 2009, Interactive effects of water table and precipitation on net CO 2 assimilation of three co-occurring Sphagnum mosses differing in distribution above the water table, Glob. Chang. Biol., 15, 680, 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01724.x · DOI
  25. Veneklaas, 1990, Hydrological properties of the epiphyte mass of a montane tropical rain forest, Colombia, Vegetatio, 89, 183, 10.1007/BF00032170 · DOI
  26. Zhang, 2016, Multi-decadal trends in global terrestrial evapotranspiration and its components, Sci. Rep., 6, 19124, 10.1038/srep19124 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Oliver, 1996, Desiccation tolerance in vegetative plant cells, Physiol. Plant., 97, 779, 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1996.tb00544.x · DOI
  28. Frumau, 2007, Biomass and water storage dynamics of epiphytes in old-growth and secondary montane cloud forest stands in Costa Rica, Plant Ecol., 193, 171, 10.1007/s11258-006-9256-7 · DOI
  29. Cruz, 2012, Implementation of the Water Framework Directive in an Outermost EU Region: The Case of Azores Archipelago, Open Hydrol. J., 6, 1, 10.2174/1874378101206010001 · doi:10.2174/1874378101206010001
  30. Rodrigues, F.C. (1993). Hidrogeologia da Ilha Terceira—Contributo Para o Seu Conhecimento. [Ph.D Thesis, Universidade dos Açores].
  31. Harter, 2015, Impacts of global climate change on the floras of oceanic islands–projections, implications and current knowledge, Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst., 17, 160, 10.1016/j.ppees.2015.01.003 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Mateo, 2016, Climate threat on the Macaronesian endemic bryophyte flora, Sci. Rep., 6, 29156, 10.1038/srep29156 · DOI
  33. Proctor, 1999, Water-relations parameters of some bryophytes evaluated by thermocouple psychrometry, J. Bryol., 21, 263, 10.1179/jbr.1999.21.4.263 · doi:10.1179/jbr.1999.21.4.263
  34. Hildenbrand, 2014, Recent plate re-organization at the Azores Triple Junction: Evidence from combined geochemical and geochronological data on Faial, S. Jorge and Terceira volcanic islands, Lithos, 210, 27, 10.1016/j.lithos.2014.09.009 · doi:10.1016/j.lithos.2014.09.009
  35. Henriques, 2017, Long-Term monitoring across elevational gradients (III): Vascular plants on Terceira Island (Azores) transect, Arquipel. -Life Mar. Sci., 34, 1
  36. Paton, J.A. (1999). The Liverwort Flora of the British Isles, Harley Books. · doi:10.1163/9789004285385
  37. Smith, A.J.E. (2004). The Moss Flora of Britain and Ireland, Cambridge University Press. [2nd ed.]. · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511541858
  38. Hodgetts, 2020, An annotated checklist of bryophytes of Europe, Macaronesia and Cyprus, J. Bryol., 42, 1, 10.1080/03736687.2019.1694329 · doi:10.1080/03736687.2019.1694329
  39. Watkins, 2007, Ecological and evolutionary consequences of desiccation tolerance in tropical fern gametophytes, New Phytol., 176, 708, 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02194.x · DOI · Paper page
  40. Santarius, 1994, Apoplasmic water fractions and osmotic water potentials at full turgidity of some Bryidae, Planta, 193, 32, 10.1007/BF00191603 · doi:10.1007/bf00191603
  41. Turner, 1981, Techniques and experimental approaches for the measurement of plant water status, Plant Soil, 58, 339, 10.1007/BF02180062 · DOI
  42. Gabriel, R. (2000). Ecophysiology of Azorean Forest Bryophytes. [Ph.D. Thesis, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of London].
  43. Smith, 1988, Aspects of Cryptogam Water Relations at a Continental Antarctic Site, Polarforschung, 58, 139
  44. Beaucourt, 2004, Influence of temperature on the effects of artificially enhanced UV-B radiation on aquatic bryophytes under laboratory conditions, Photosynthetica, 42, 201, 10.1023/B:PHOT.0000040591.74037.f1 · DOI
  45. Vanderpoorten, A., and Goffinet, B. (2009). Introduction to Bryophytes, Cambridge University Press. [1st ed.]. · DOI · Paper page
  46. Vitt, 2006, The role of Sphagnum in peatland development and persistence, Boreal Peatland Ecosystems (Ecological Studies), Volume 188, 49
  47. Tuba, Z., Slack, N.G., and Stark, L.R. (2011). Bryophyte Ecology and Climate Change, Cambridge University Press. · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511779701
  48. Hayward, 1982, Profiles of Water Content and Pore Size in Sphagnum and Peat, and their Relation to Peat Bog Ecology, Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., 215, 299
  49. Schipperges, 1998, Response of photosynthesis of Sphagnum species from contrasting microhabitats to tissue water content and repeated desiccation, New Phytol., 140, 677, 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00311.x · DOI · Paper page
  50. Noailles, 1987, Les frontières des plantes vasculaires, Bull. La Société Bot. Fr., 134, 53
  51. Bayfield, 1973, Notes on water relations of Polytrichum commune Hedw, J. Bryol., 7, 607, 10.1179/jbr.1973.7.4.607 · doi:10.1179/jbr.1973.7.4.607
  52. Sollows, 2001, Recovery of Bazzania trilobata following desiccation, Bryologist, 104, 421, 10.1639/0007-2745(2001)104[0421:ROBTFD]2.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1639/0007-2745(2001)104[0421:robtfd]2.0.co;2
  53. Cardoso, 2017, The role of epiphytic bryophytes in interception, storage, and the regulated release of atmospheric moisture in a tropical montane cloud forest, J. Hydrol., 548, 665, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.03.043 · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.03.043
  54. Cleavitt, 2007, The role of water availability in seasonal growth of Bazzania trilobata on boulders in an eastern hemlock stand, Bryologist, 110, 295, 10.1639/0007-2745(2007)110[295:TROWAI]2.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1639/0007-2745(2007)110[295:trowai]2.0.co;2
  55. Cary, G., Lindenmayer, D., and Dovers, S. (2003). Australia Burning: Fire Ecology. Policy and Management Issues, CSIRO Publishing. · DOI
  56. Song, 2015, Water relations and gas exchange of fan bryophytes and their adaptations to microhabitats in an Asian subtropical montane cloud forest, J. Plant Res., 128, 573, 10.1007/s10265-015-0721-z · doi:10.1007/s10265-015-0721-z
  57. Heijmans, 2004, Controls on moss evaporation in a boreal black spruce forest, Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles, 18, 1, 10.1029/2003GB002128 · DOI
  58. Magdefrau, 1982, Life forms of Bryophytes, Bryophyt. Ecol., 2, 45, 10.1007/978-94-009-5891-3_2 · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-5891-3_2
  59. Rixen, 2005, Improved water retention links high species richness with increased productivity in arctic tundra moss communities, Oecologia, 146, 287, 10.1007/s00442-005-0196-z · DOI
  60. Frahm, 2003, Manual of Tropical Bryology, Trop. Bryol., 23, 1

Metadata

Authors
Coelho, M. C. M., Gabriel, R., & Ah-Peng, C.
Venue
Diversity
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-02-17
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
295
ISSN
1424-2818
Cited by
18
Language
en
Funders
  • ERANET BIOME MOVECLIM Montane vegetation (M2.1.2/F/04/2011/NET, M3.1.2/F/007/2012, FCT-UIDB/00329/2020-2024, M1.1.A/FUNC.UI&D/010/2021-2024)
  • FUNDO REGIONAL PARA A CIÊNCIA E TECNOLOGIA (FRCT) of the regional government of the Azores (M2.1.2/F/04/2011/NET, M3.1.2/F/007/2012, FCT-UIDB/00329/2020-2024, M1.1.A/FUNC.UI&D/010/2021-2024)
  • Thematic Line 1 – integrated ecological assessment of environmental change on biodiversity (M2.1.2/F/04/2011/NET, M3.1.2/F/007/2012, FCT-UIDB/00329/2020-2024, M1.1.A/FUNC.UI&D/010/2021-2024)
  • Azores DRCT Pluriannual Funding (M2.1.2/F/04/2011/NET, M3.1.2/F/007/2012, FCT-UIDB/00329/2020-2024, M1.1.A/FUNC.UI&D/010/2021-2024)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterizing and Quantifying Water Content in 14 Species of Bryophytes Present in Azorean Native Vegetation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/d15020295
The paper
Coelho, M. C. M., Gabriel, R., & Ah-Peng, C. (2023). Characterizing and Quantifying Water Content in 14 Species of Bryophytes Present in Azorean Native Vegetation. Diversity. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15020295

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.