An Aggregated-Based Deep Learning Method for Leukemic B-lymphoblast Classification
Open accessAbstract
Leukemia is a cancer of blood cells in the bone marrow that affects both children and adolescents. The rapid growth of unusual lymphocyte cells leads to bone marrow failure, which may slow down the production of new blood cells, and hence increases patient morbidity and mortality. Age is a crucial clinical factor in leukemia diagnosis, since if leukemia is diagnosed in the early stages, it is highly curable. Incidence is increasing globally, as around 412,000 people worldwide are likely to be diagnosed with some type of leukemia, of which acute lymphoblastic leukemia accounts for approximately 12% of all leukemia cases worldwide. Thus, the reliable and accurate detection of normal and malignant cells is of major interest. Automatic detection with computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) models can assist medics, and can be beneficial for the early detection of leukemia. In this paper, a single center study, we aimed to build an aggregated deep learning model for Leukemic B-lymphoblast classification. To make a reliable and accurate deep learner, data augmentation techniques were applied to tackle the limited dataset size, and a transfer learning strategy was employed to accelerate the learning process, and further improve the performance of the proposed network. The results show that our proposed approach was able to fuse features extracted from the best deep learning models, and outperformed individual networks with a test accuracy of 96.58% in Leukemic B-lymphoblast diagnosis.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The ViT-CNN ensemble model has a 2.45% higher accuracy rate than the model proposed in literature [11].
“Compared with the model in literature [11], the accuracy rate of the model proposed in literature [11] is 96.58%, while the accuracy rate of the ViT-CNN ensemble model is 99.03%; this accuracy rate is 2.45% higher than the model proposed in the literature.”
From Method for diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia based on vit-cnn ensemble model (2021) · cites this paper as [11]
Literature [11] has the best current research results on diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
“Literature [11] has the best current research results on diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia.”
From Method for diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia based on vit-cnn ensemble model (2021) · cites this paper as [11]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 55 · Cited by 76
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [15]Kassani S.H. Kassani P.H. Najafi S.E. Introducing a hybrid model of DEA and data mining in evaluating efficiency. Case study: Bank Branches arXiv 2018 1810.05524
- Authors
- Kasani, P. H., Park, S.-W., & Jang, J.-W.
- Affiliations
- Kangwon National University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Jang, Jae-Won
- Venue
- Diagnostics
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-12-08
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1064
- ISSN
- 2075-4418 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7763941
- OpenAlex
- W3112002460
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 5
- FWCI
- 3.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Diagnostics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
- Keywords
- acute lymphoblastic leukemia, computer-aided diagnosis, feature fusion, transfer learning, data augmentation, pediatric leukemia, bone marrow morphology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review