Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Detection Machine Learning Model Based on Optimized Feature Selection and Explainable Artificial Intelligence
Open accessAbstract
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) has been classified as a severe health problem common among women globally. Early detection and treatment of PCOS reduce the possibility of long-term complications, such as increasing the chances of developing type 2 diabetes and gestational diabetes. Therefore, effective and early PCOS diagnosis will help the healthcare systems to reduce the disease’s problems and complications. Machine learning (ML) and ensemble learning have recently shown promising results in medical diagnostics. The main goal of our research is to provide model explanations to ensure efficiency, effectiveness, and trust in the developed model through local and global explanations. Feature selection methods with different types of ML models (logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), naive Bayes (NB), support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), xgboost, and Adaboost algorithm to get optimal feature selection and best model. Stacking ML models that combine the best base ML models with meta-learner are proposed to improve performance. Bayesian optimization is used to optimize ML models. Combining SMOTE (Synthetic Minority Oversampling Techniques) and ENN (Edited Nearest Neighbour) solves the class imbalance. The experimental results were made using a benchmark PCOS dataset with two ratios splitting 70:30 and 80:20. The result showed that the Stacking ML with REF feature selection recorded the highest accuracy at 100 compared to other models.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Integration of IoT technologies, including AI and machine learning, holds potential to aid PCOS diagnosis and risk prediction, aimed at reducing delays in diagnosis.
“The integration of IoT technologies, including AI and machine learning, holds the potential to aid PCOS diagnosis and risk prediction, aimed at reducing delays in diagnosis [103,104].”
From Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and the Internet of Things: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as [103]
The Introduction (page not available) says AI-based methods can distinguish PCOS patients from others and could lead to earlier diagnoses; the Methodology describes ML models used to predict PCOS. The cited paper does not describe integrating these methods with IoT technologies, so that part of the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 140
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- [19]Bhardwaj P. Tiwari P. Manoeuvre of Machine Learning Algorithms in Healthcare Sector with Application to Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome Diagnosis Proceedings of Academia-Industry Consortium for Data Science: AICDS 2020 Springer New York, NY, USA 2022 71 84
- [28]Joenssen D. Bankhofer U. Hot Deck Methods for Imputing Missing Data Hot Deck Methods for Imputing Missing Data the Effects of Limiting Donor Usage 13 July 2012 Available online: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Hot-Deck-Methods-for-Imputing-Missing-Data-The-of-Joenssen-Bankhofer/853253faf9d7ee66a4ebd749659c463cdc475f7c (accessed on 17 March 2023)
- [31]Gu Q. Li Z. Han J. Generalized fisher score for feature selection arXiv 2012 1202.3725
- [35]Bateni M. Chen L. Fahrbach M. Fu G. Mirrokni V. Yasuda T. Sequential Attention for Feature Selection arXiv 2022 2209.14881
- [42]Chen T. He T. Benesty M. Khotilovich V. Tang Y. Cho H. Chen K. Mitchell R. Cano I. Zhou T. Xgboost: Extreme Gradient Boosting R Package Version 0.4-2 2015 Volume 1 1 4 Available online: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?oi=bibs&cluster=11444560539169478279&btnI=1&hl=en (accessed on 17 March 2023)
- Authors
- Elmannai, H., El-Rashidy, N., Mashal, I., Alohali, M. A., Farag, S., El-Sappagh, S., & Saleh, H.
- Affiliations
- Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (SA)
- Kafrelsheikh University (EG)
- Applied Science Private University (JO)
- South Valley University (EG)
- Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Galala University, Suez 435611, Egypt
- Corresponding author
- Saleh, Hager
- Venue
- Diagnostics
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2023-04-21
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1506
- ISSN
- 2075-4418 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10137609
- OpenAlex
- W4366774874
- Cited by
- 140
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 46 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 9
- FWCI
- 31.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Diagnostics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (PNURSP2023R330)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
- Keywords
- polycystic ovary syndrome, PCOS diagnosis, early detection, feature selection, explainable AI, model explanation, stacking ensemble, Bayesian optimization, class imbalance, SMOTE, medical diagnostics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review