CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 25

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Current Understanding and Future Research Direction for Estimating the Postmortem Interval: A Systematic Review

Strete, Gabriela, Sălcudean, Andreea, Cozma, Adina-Alexandra, Radu, Carmen-Corina·2025·Diagnostics
DOI 10.3390/diagnostics15151954
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background: Accurate estimation of the postmortem interval (PMI) is critical in forensic death investigations. Traditional signs of death—algor mortis, livor mortis, and rigor mortis—are generally reliable only within the first two to three days after death, with their accuracy decreasing as decomposition progresses. This paper presents a systematic review conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, aiming to evaluate and compare current methods for estimating the PMI. Specifically, the study identifies both traditional and modern techniques, analyzes their advantages, limitations, and applicable timeframes, critically synthesizes the literature, and highlights the importance of combining multiple approaches to improve accuracy. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, following the PRISMA guidelines. The review included original articles and reviews that evaluated PMI estimation methods (through thanatological signs, entomology, microbial succession, molecular, imaging, and omics approaches). Extracted data included study design, methodology, PMI range, and accuracy information. Out of the 1245 identified records, 50 studies met the inclusion criteria for qualitative synthesis. Results: Emerging methods, such as molecular markers, microbial succession, omics technologies, and advanced imaging show improved accuracy across extended postmortem intervals. RNA degradation methods demonstrated higher accuracy within the first 72 h, while entomology and microbial analysis are more applicable during intermediate and late decomposition stages. Although no single method is universally reliable, combining traditional and modern approaches tailored to case-specific factors improves overall PMI estimation accuracy. Conclusions: This study supports the use of an integrative, multidisciplinary, and evidence-based approach to improve time-since-death estimation. Such a strategy enhances forensic outcomes by enabling more precise PMI estimates in complex or delayed cases, increasing legal reliability, and supporting court-admissible expert testimony based on validated, multi-method protocols.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/diagnostics15151954

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 67

  1. Madea, 2006, Precision of estimating the time since death using different criteria of excitability, Forensic Sci. Med. Pathol., 2, 127, 10.1385/FSMP:2:2:127 · DOI
  2. Imbri, 1995, Late postmortem changes, Treatise of Forensic Medicine, Volume 1, 111
  3. Singh, 2025, Advancements in estimating post-mortem interval in medico-legal practice: A comprehensive review, Leg. Med., 75, 102627, 10.1016/j.legalmed.2025.102627 · DOI
  4. Madea, 2016, Methods for determining time of death, Forensic Sci. Med. Pathol., 12, 451, 10.1007/s12024-016-9776-y · DOI
  5. Henssge, 2007, Estimation of the time since death, Forensic Sci. Int., 165, 182, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.05.017 · DOI
  6. Franceschetti, L., Amadasi, A., Bugelli, V., Bolsi, G., and Tsokos, M. (2023). Estimation of Late Postmortem Interval: Where Do We Stand? A Literature Review. Biology, 12. · DOI
  7. Zilg, 2015, A new model for the estimation of time of death from vitreous potassium levels corrected for age and temperature, Forensic Sci. Int., 254, 158, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.07.020 · DOI
  8. Lange, 1994, Human postmortem interval estimation from vitreous potassium: An analysis of original data from six different studies, Forensic Sci. Int., 66, 159, 10.1016/0379-0738(94)90341-7 · DOI
  9. McCleskey, 2016, Review of Postmortem Interval Estimation Using Vitreous Humor: Past, Present and, Future, Acad. Forensic Pathol., 6, 12, 10.23907/2016.002 · DOI
  10. Matuszewski, S. (2021). Post-Mortem Interval Estimation Based on Insect Evidence: Current Challenges. Insects, 12. · DOI
  11. Chan, 2021, Infrared thermography as a modality for tracking cutaneous temperature change and postmortem interval in the critical care setting, Forensic Sci. Int., 327, 110960, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110960 · DOI
  12. Wang, 2017, Estimation of Postmortem Interval Using the Radiological Techniques, Computed Tomography: A Pilot Study, J. Forensic Sci. Med., 3, 1, 10.4103/jfsm.jfsm_4_17 · DOI
  13. Klontzas, 2023, Post-mortem CT radiomics for the prediction of time since death, Eur. Radiol., 33, 8387, 10.1007/s00330-023-09746-2 · DOI
  14. Shen, 2024, A computational approach to estimate postmortem interval using postmortem computed tomography of multiple tissues based on animal, Int. J. Leg. Med., 138, 1093, 10.1007/s00414-023-03127-6 · DOI
  15. Guerreri, 2025, Exploring radiomic features of lateral cerebral ventricles in postmortem CT for postmortem interval estimation, Int. J. Leg. Med., 139, 667, 10.1007/s00414-024-03396-9 · DOI
  16. Sapienza, D., Asmundo, A., Silipigni, S., Ugo, B., Antonella, C., Francesca, G., Valeria, B., Patrizia, G., Antonio, B., and Michele, G. (2020). Feasibility study of MRI Muscles Molecular Imaging in Evaluation of Early Post-Mortem Interval. Sci. Rep., 10. · DOI
  17. Zissler, A., Steinbacher, P., Monticelli, F.C., and Pittner, S. (2020). Postmortem Protein Degradation as a tool to Estimate the PMI: A Systematic Review. Diagnostics, 10. · DOI
  18. Metcalf, 2013, microbial clock provides an accurate estimate of postmortem interval in a mouse model system, Life, 2, e01104
  19. Secco, L., Palumbi, S., Padalino, P., Grosso, E., Perilli, M., Casonato, M., Cecchetto, G., and Viel, G. (2025). “Omics” and Postmortem Interval Estimation: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 26. · DOI
  20. Cianci, V., Mondelo, C., Sapienza, D., Guerrer, M.C., Cianci, A., Cracò, A., Omero, F., Gioffrè, V., Gualniera, P., and Asmundo, A. (2024). Potential role of mRNA in Estimating Postmortem Interval: A systematic Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 25. · DOI
  21. Megyesi, 2024, Estimating the postmortem interval using Total Body Score TBS and Accumulated Degree Days (ADD). Curent applications and refinememnts, Int. J. Leg. Med., 138, 725
  22. Cordeiro, 2019, Areliable method for estimating the post-mortem interval from the biochemistry of the vitreous humor, temperature and body weight, Forensic Sci. Int., 295, 157, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.12.007 · DOI
  23. Sturner, 1964, The post-mortem interval. A study of potassium in the vitreous humor, Am. J. Clin. Pathol., 42, 137, 10.1093/ajcp/42.2.137 · DOI
  24. Coe, 1989, Vitreous potassium as a measure of the postmortem interval: An historical review and critical evaluation, Forensic Sci. Int., 42, 201, 10.1016/0379-0738(89)90087-X · DOI
  25. Li, 2016, Research progress in the estimation of the postmortem interval by chinese forensic scholars, Forensic Sci. Res., 1, 3, 10.1080/20961790.2016.1229377 · DOI
  26. Tozzo, P., Amico, I., Delicati, A., Toselli, F., and Caenazzo, L. (2022). Post-Mortem Interval and Microbiome Analysis through 16S rRNA Analysis: A Systematic Review. Diagnostics, 12. · DOI
  27. Laplace, 2021, Estimation of the time since death based on body cooling: A comparative study of four temperature-based methods, Int. J. Leg. Med., 135, 2479, 10.1007/s00414-021-02635-7 · DOI
  28. Bhoyar, 2025, Assessing the forensic implications of DNA degradation for PMI estimation using comet assay: A systematic review, J. Forensic Leg. Med., 109, 102801, 10.1016/j.jflm.2025.102801 · DOI
  29. Bansode, 2025, Challenges and considerations in forensic entomology: A comprehensive review, J. Forensic Leg. Med., 110, 102831, 10.1016/j.jflm.2025.102831 · DOI
  30. Schoenly, 1992, A BASIC algorithm for calculating the postmortem interval from arthropod successional data, J. Forensic Sci., 37, 808, 10.1520/JFS11992J · DOI
  31. Schoenly, 1996, Quantifying statistical uncertainty in succession-based entomological estimates of the postmortem interval in death scene investigations: A simulation study, Am. Entomol., 42, 106, 10.1093/ae/42.2.106 · DOI
  32. Marchenko, 2001, Medicolegal relevance of cadaver entomofauna for the determination of the time of death, Forensic Sci. Int., 120, 89, 10.1016/S0379-0738(01)00416-9 · DOI
  33. Donovan, 2006, Larval growth rates of the blowfly, Calliphora vicina, over a range of temperatures, Med. Vet. Entomol., 20, 106, 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2006.00600.x · DOI
  34. Michaud, 2009, Predicting the visitation of carcasses by carrion-related insects under different rates of degree-day accumulation, Forensic Sci. Int., 185, 78, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.12.015 · DOI
  35. Reibe, 2010, A new simulation-based model for calculating post-mortem intervals using developmental data for Lucilia sericata (Dipt.: Calliphoridae), Parasitol. Res., 107, 9, 10.1007/s00436-010-1879-x · DOI
  36. Matuszewski, 2011, Estimating the pre-appearance interval from temperature in Necrodeslittoralis L. (Coleopt.: Silphidae), Forensic Sci. Int., 212, 180, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.06.010 · DOI
  37. Mohr, 2015, Development and validation of a new technique for estimating a minimum postmortem interval using adult blow fly (Diptera: Calliphoridae) carcass attendance, Int. J. Leg. Med., 129, 851, 10.1007/s00414-014-1094-x · DOI
  38. Matuszewski, 2017, A general approach for postmortem interval based on uniformly distributed and interconnected qualitative indicators, Int. J. Leg. Med., 131, 877, 10.1007/s00414-016-1520-3 · DOI
  39. Matuszewski, 2018, Size at emergence improves accuracy of age estimates in forensically-useful beetle Creophilus maxillosus L. (Staphylinidae), Sci. Rep., 8, 106, 10.1038/s41598-018-20796-1 · DOI
  40. Obafunwa, 2025, A review of the estimation of postmortem interval using forensic entomology, Med. Sci. Law., 65, 52, 10.1177/00258024241275893 · DOI
  41. Bell, 2018, Sex-related differences in the thanatomicrobiome in postmortem heart samples using bacterial gene regions V1-2 and V4, Lett. Appl. Microbiol., 67, 144, 10.1111/lam.13005 · DOI
  42. Lutz, H., Vangelatos, A., Gottel, N., Osculati, A., Visona, S., Finley, S.J., Gilbert, J.A., and Javan, G.T. (2020). Effects of Extended Postmortem Interval on Microbial Communities in Organs of the Human Cadaver. Front. Microbiol., 11. · DOI
  43. Zapico, 2022, Postmortem Interval Estimation: New Approaches by the Analysis of Human Tissues and Microbial Communities’ Changes, Forensic Sci., 1, 163, 10.3390/forensicsci2010013 · DOI
  44. Wang, Z., Zhang, F., Wang, L., Yuan, H., Guan, D., and Zhao, R. (2022). Advances in artificial intelligence-based microbiome for PMI estimation. Front. Microbiol., 13. · DOI
  45. Pittner, 2016, Postmortem muscle protein degradation in humans as a tool for PMI delimitation, Int. J. Leg. Med., 130, 1547, 10.1007/s00414-016-1349-9 · DOI
  46. Luna, 2019, Association between protein profile and postmortem interval in human bone remains, J. Proteom., 192, 54, 10.1016/j.jprot.2018.08.008 · DOI
  47. Javan, G.T., Hanson, E., Finley, S.J., Visonà, S.D., Osculati, A., and Ballantyne, J. (2020). Identification of cadaveric liver tissues using thanatotranscriptome biomarkers. Sci. Rep., 10. · DOI
  48. Gerra, 2024, Epigenetic analyses in forensic medicine: Future and challenges, Int. J. Leg. Med., 138, 701, 10.1007/s00414-024-03165-8 · DOI
  49. Schmidt, V.M., Zelger, P., Woss, C., Huck, C.W., Arora, R., Bechtel, E., Stahl, A., Brunner, A., Zelger, B., and Schirmer, M. (2022). Post-Mortem Interval of Human Skeletal Remains Estimated with Handheld NIR Spectrometry. Biology, 11. · DOI
  50. Procopio, 2018, Forensic proteomics for the evaluation of the post-mortem decay in bones, J. Proteom., 177, 21, 10.1016/j.jprot.2018.01.016 · DOI
  51. Du, T., Lin, Z., Xie, Y., Ye, X., Tu, C., Jin, K., Xie, J., and Shen, Y. (2018). Metabolic profiling of femoral muscle from rats at different periods of time after death. PLoS ONE, 13. · DOI
  52. Ferreira, 2018, The effects of death and post-mortem cold ischemia on human tissue transcriptomes, Nat. Commun., 9, 490, 10.1038/s41467-017-02772-x · DOI
  53. Choi, 2019, Postmortem proteomics to discover biomarkers for forensic PMI estimation, Int. J. Leg. Med., 133, 899, 10.1007/s00414-019-02011-6 · DOI
  54. Bonicelli, 2022, The `ForensOMICS` approach for postmortem interval estimation from human bone by integrating metabolomics, lipidomics, and proteomics, ELife, 11, e83658, 10.7554/eLife.83658 · DOI
  55. Li, 2024, Multi-omics integration strategy in the post-mortem interval of forensic science, Talanta, 268, 125249, 10.1016/j.talanta.2023.125249 · DOI
  56. 2024, Accuracy of estimating postmortem interval using the relationship between total body score and accumulated degree-days: A systematic review and meta-analysis, Int. J. Leg. Med., 138, 2659, 10.1007/s00414-024-03304-1 · DOI
  57. Matuszewski, 2021, Estimating the post-mortem interval with forensic entomology-quo vadis?, Forensic Sci. Int., 320, 110701
  58. Reiter, 1984, Zumwachstumsverhalten der maden der blauenschmeißfliege Calliphoravicina, Z. Für Rechtsmed., 91, 295, 10.1007/BF02332323 · DOI
  59. Amendt, 2007, Best practice in forensic entomology-standards and guidelines, Int. J. Leg. Med., 121, 90, 10.1007/s00414-006-0086-x · DOI
  60. Amendth, 2011, Forensic entomology: Applications and limitations, Forensic Sci. Med. Pathol., 7, 379, 10.1007/s12024-010-9209-2 · DOI
  61. Metcalf, 2016, Microbial community assembly and metabolic function during mammalian corpse decomposition, Science, 351, 158, 10.1126/science.aad2646 · DOI
  62. Javan, G.T., Finley, S.J., Abidin, Z., and Mulle, J.G. (2016). The thanatomicrobiome: A missing piece of the microbial puzzle of death. Front Microbiol., 7. · DOI
  63. Pechal, 2014, The potential use of bacterial community succession in forensics as described by high throughout metagenomic sequencing, Int. J. Legal Med., 128, 193, 10.1007/s00414-013-0872-1 · DOI
  64. Hauther, 2015, Estimating time since death from postmortem human gut microbial communities, J. Forensic Sci., 60, 1234, 10.1111/1556-4029.12828 · DOI
  65. Cianci, V., Mondello, C., Sapienza, D., Guerrera, M.C., Cianci, A., Cracò, A., Luppino, F., Gioffrè, V., Gualniera, P., and Asmundo, A. (2024). MicroRNAs as New Biomolecular Markers to Estimate Time since Death: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 25. · DOI
  66. Longato, 2015, Post-mortem interval estimation of human skeletal remains by micro-computed tomography, mid-infrared microscopic imaging and energy dispersive X-ray mapping, Anal. Methods, 7, 2917, 10.1039/C4AY02943G · DOI
  67. Chiroban, 2017, Obesity and overweight risk factors in sudden death due to cardiovascular causes: A case series, Iran. J. Public Health, 46, 958

Metadata

Authors
Strete, G., Sălcudean, A., Cozma, A.-A., & Radu, C.-C.
Venue
Diagnostics
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2025-08-04
Volume
15
Issue
15
Pages
1954
ISSN
2075-4418
DOI
10.3390/diagnostics15151954
Cited by
25
References
2
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current Understanding and Future Research Direction for Estimating the Postmortem Interval: A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/diagnostics15151954
The paper
Strete, G., Sălcudean, A., Cozma, A.-A., & Radu, C.-C. (2025). Current Understanding and Future Research Direction for Estimating the Postmortem Interval: A Systematic Review. Diagnostics. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15151954