Cited by 9Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesPharmacy and Medical PracticesPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions

Unveiling Drug-Drug Interactions in Dental Patients: A Retrospective Real-World Study

Open access
Colibășanu, Daiana, Ardelean, Sebastian Mihai, Goldiș, Florina-Diana, Drăgoi, Maria-Medana, Vasii, Sabina-Oana, Maksimović, Tamara, Colibășanu, Șerban, Șoica, Codruța +1 more·2025·Dentistry Journal

Abstract

Background: Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are a growing safety concern in dental care, particularly among patients with comorbidities and polypharmacy. However, real-world data (RWD) on the prevalence and severity of DDIs in dental settings remain scarce. Objectives: This study aimed to assess the frequency, severity, and clinical relevance of DDIs in dental patients and to identify age- and comorbidity-related risk patterns. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed a cohort of 105 dental patients, considering demographics, preexisting diseases, dental procedures, and prescribed medications. We examined drug-drug interactions (DDIs) employing the DrugBank Drug Interaction Checker, which yields DDI severity into major, moderate, or minor. Results: 45.7% of patients had preexisting diseases, with cardiovascular diseases most prevalent (19.0%). Higher prevalent dental diagnoses and procedures included apical lesions (47.6%) and tooth extractions (53.3%), suggesting frequent pharmacotherapy exposure. We identified 542 DDIs out of 1332 drug pairs and found 2.3% major, 25.0% moderate, and 13.4% minor, with 59.3% showing no interactions. Key high-risk DDIs included epinephrine with beta-blockers. Fifteen patients aged 31–60 years experienced the most major DDIs of 61.3%, patients ≥ 61 years faced 38.7%, and the 0–30 group had none, highlighting age-specific risks. The higher DDIs burden in the 31–60 age group may reflect better knowledge of the drugs they used and accurate reporting of them. Conclusions: Our retrospective study addresses the paucity of dental DDIs real-world data (RWD) studies, pleading for improved drug reconciliation, systematic screening, and age- and comorbidity-tailored strategies to enhance patient safety.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/dj13060255

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 66

  1. [1]Seymour R.A. Drug interactions in dentistry Dent. Update 2009 36 458 470 10.12968/denu.2009.36.8.458 19927455 · DOI
  2. [3]Ouanounou A. Ng K. Chaban P. Adverse drug reactions in dentistry Int. Dent. J. 2020 70 79 84 10.1111/idj.12540 31944297 PMC9379193 · DOI
  3. [4]Dawoud B. Roberts A. Yates J. Drug interactions in general dental practice–considerations for the dental practitioner Br. Dent. J. 2014 216 15 23 10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.1237 24413115 · DOI
  4. [5]Decloux D. Ouanounou A. Local anaesthesia in dentistry: A review Int. Dent. J. 2021 71 87 95 10.1111/idj.12615 PMC9275172 32944974 · DOI
  5. [6]Knox C. Wilson M. Klinger C.M. Franklin M. Oler E. Wilson A. Pon A. Cox J. Chin N.E. Strawbridge S.A. DrugBank 6.0: The DrugBank knowledgebase for 2024 Nucleic Acids Res. 2024 52 D1265 D1275 10.1093/nar/gkad976 37953279 PMC10767804 · DOI
  6. [7]Seymour R.A. Antibiotics in dentistry—An update Dent. Update 2013 40 319 322 10.12968/denu.2013.40.4.319 23829014 · DOI
  7. [8]Salgado-Peralvo A.O. Mateos-Moreno M.V. Velasco-Ortega E. Peña-Cardelles J.F. Kewalramani N. Preventive antibiotic therapy in bone augmentation procedures in oral implantology: A systematic review J. Stomatol. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2022 123 74 80 10.1016/j.jormas.2021.01.011 33493687 · DOI
  8. [9]Luchian I. Goriuc A. Martu M.A. Covasa M. Clindamycin as an alternative option in optimizing periodontal therapy Antibiotics 2021 10 814 10.3390/antibiotics10070814 34356735 PMC8300806 · DOI
  9. [11]Becker D.E. Pain management: Part 1: Managing acute and postoperative dental pain Anesth. Prog. 2010 57 67 10.2344/0003-3006-57.2.67 20553137 PMC2886920 · DOI
  10. [12]Moore P.A. Ziegler K.M. Lipman R.D. Aminoshariae A. Carrasco-Labra A. Mariotti A. Benefits and harms associated with analgesic medications used in the management of acute dental pain: An overview of systematic reviews J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2018 149 256 265 10.1016/j.adaj.2018.02.012 29599019 · DOI
  11. [14]Pimenta R.P. Takahashi C.M. Barberato-Filho S. McClung D.C.F. Moraes F.d.S. de Souza I.M. Bergamaschi C.d.C. Preemptive use of anti-inflammatories and analgesics in oral surgery: A review of systematic reviews Front. Pharmacol. 2024 14 1303382 10.3389/fphar.2023.1303382 38328575 PMC10847331 · DOI
  12. [15]Hargreaves K. Abbott P. Drugs for pain management in dentistry Aust. Dent. J. 2005 50 S14 S22 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2005.tb00378.x 16416713 · DOI
  13. [16]Appukuttan D.P. Strategies to manage patients with dental anxiety and dental phobia: Literature review Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dent. 2016 8 35 50 10.2147/CCIDE.S63626 PMC4790493 27022303 · DOI · Paper page
  14. [18]Ogle O.E. Hertz M.B. Anxiety control in the dental patient Dent. Clin. 2012 56 1 16 10.1016/j.cden.2011.06.001 22117939 · DOI
  15. [19]Masuda R. Nonaka M. Nishimura A. Gotoh K. Oka S. Iijima T. Optimal and safe standard doses of midazolam and propofol to achieve patient and doctor satisfaction with dental treatment: A prospective cohort study PLoS ONE 2017 12 e0171627 10.1371/journal.pone.0171627 28182732 PMC5300152 · DOI
  16. [20]Khinda V. Rao D. Sodhi S.P.S. Nitrous oxide inhalation sedation rapid analgesia in dentistry: An overview of technique, objectives, indications, advantages, monitoring, and safety profile Int. J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent. 2023 16 131 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1807 37020786 PMC10067981 · DOI
  17. [21]Inoue T. Yamamoto T. Kishimoto N. Seo K. Comparison of Anesthetic Features in Diazepam and Midazolam for Sedation Dentistry: A Scoping Review Cureus 2025 17 e79079 10.7759/cureus.79079 40104467 PMC11915189 · DOI
  18. [22]Hersh E.V. Moore P.A. Three serious drug interactions that every dentist should know about Compendium 2015 36 739 744 26053779
  19. [23]Weinstock R.J. Johnson M.P. Review of top 10 prescribed drugs and their interaction with dental treatment Dent. Clin. 2016 60 421 434 10.1016/j.cden.2015.11.005 27040293 · DOI
  20. [25]Becker D.E. Antithrombotic drugs: Pharmacology and implications for dental practice Anesth. Prog. 2013 60 72 10.2344/0003-3006-60.2.72 23763563 PMC3683884 · DOI
  21. [27]Muñoz-Martínez C. Segura-Puertas M. Gómez-Moreno G. Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) and drug interactions in dentistry Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2021 25 2834 2842 33877648
  22. [28]Valtellini R. Ouanounou A. Management of the Hypertensive Dental Patient J. Can. Dent. Assoc. 2023 89 1 4 37098279
  23. [29]Gomez-Moreno G. Remdesivir-COVID-19: Drug interactions in dentistry Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2020 24 9739 9743 33015819
  24. [30]Mohan S. Govila V. Saini A. Verma S.C. Prime drug interplay in dental practice J. Clin. Diagn. Res. JCDR 2016 10 ZE07 10.7860/JCDR/2016/16912.7434 PMC4843406 27135021 · DOI
  25. [31]Goh W. Tao X. Zhang J. Yong J. A study of drug interaction for personalised decision support in dental clinics Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT) Singapore 6–9 December 2015 IEEE Piscataway, NJ, USA 2015 Volume 3 88 91
  26. [32]De Oliveira M.L.R. Nery G.O. Torresan T.T. Arcanjo R.A. Ferreira M.B.C. Montagner F. Frequency and characterization of potential drug interactions in dentistry—A cross-sectional study Clin. Oral Investig. 2022 26 6829 6837 10.1007/s00784-022-04644-1 35930141 · DOI
  27. [33]Abbaszadeh E. Hakemi N.G. Rad M. Torabi M. Drug-Drug Interactions in Elderly Adults in Dentistry Care: A Cross-Sectional Study J. Dent. 2022 23 459 PMC9883622 36718158
  28. [34]Abeleira-Pazos M.T. García-Mato E. Diniz-Freitas M. Muñoz-Navarro C. Lago-Méndez L. Vázquez-García E. Rivas-Mundiña B. Discrepancy in medications reported by elderly patients in the dental office and in their electronic medical records: A pilot study Spec. Care Dent. 2024 44 1162 1170 10.1111/scd.12963 38233963 · DOI
  29. [36]Suciu L. Ardelean S.M. Udrescu M. Goldiş F.D. Hânda D. Tuică M.M. Vasii S.O. Udrescu L. Categorical Analysis of Database Consistency in Reporting Drug–Drug Interactions for Cardiovascular Diseases Pharmaceutics 2024 16 339 10.3390/pharmaceutics16030339 38543232 PMC10975099 · DOI
  30. [37]Udrescu M. Ardelean S.M. Udrescu L. The curse and blessing of abundance—The evolution of drug interaction databases and their impact on drug network analysis GigaScience 2023 12 giad011 10.1093/gigascience/giad011 36892110 PMC10023830 · DOI
  31. [38]Hersh E.V. Moore P.A. Drug interactions in dentistry: The importance of knowing your CYPs J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2004 135 298 311 10.14219/jada.archive.2004.0178 15058617 · DOI · Paper page
  32. [39]Soto A.P. Meyer S.L. Oral implications of polypharmacy in older adults Dent. Clin. 2021 65 323 343 10.1016/j.cden.2020.11.007 33641756 · DOI
  33. [40]Southerland J.H. Gill D.G. Gangula P.R. Halpern L.R. Cardona C.Y. Mouton C.P. Dental management in patients with hypertension: Challenges and solutions Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dent. 2016 8 111 120 10.2147/CCIDE.S99446 PMC5074706 27799823 · DOI
  34. [41]Sankar V. Saaed Y. Joseph R.M. Azizi H. Mariyam Thomas P. Serious drug-drug interactions in the prescriptions of diabetic patients Med. Sci. 2015 3 93 103 10.3390/medsci3040093 PMC5635762 29083394 · DOI
  35. [42]Tibúrcio-Machado C. Michelon C. Zanatta F. Gomes M.S. Marin J.A. Bier C.A. The global prevalence of apical periodontitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis Int. Endod. J. 2021 54 712 735 10.1111/iej.13467 33378579 · DOI
  36. [43]Segura-Egea J. Gould K. Şen B.H. Jonasson P. Cotti E. Mazzoni A. Sunay H. Tjäderhane L. Dummer P. Antibiotics in Endodontics: A review Int. Endod. J. 2017 50 1169 1184 10.1111/iej.12741 28005295 · DOI
  37. [44]Teoh L. Moses G. McCullough M. A review of drugs that contribute to bleeding risk in general dental practice Aust. Dent. J. 2020 65 118 130 10.1111/adj.12751 32064612 · DOI
  38. [45]Thornhill M. Dayer M. Durkin M. Lockhart P. Baddour L. Risk of adverse reactions to oral antibiotics prescribed by dentists J. Dent. Res. 2019 98 1081 1087 10.1177/0022034519863645 31314998 PMC8256247 · DOI
  39. [46]Gasner N. Ouanounou A. Analgesics and pain management following root canal therapy Essent. Dent. 2021 1 1 11 10.5152/EssentDent.2021.21006 · DOI
  40. [47]Malamed S.F. Pain management following dental trauma and surgical procedures Dent. Traumatol. 2023 39 295 303 10.1111/edt.12840 36961318 · DOI
  41. [48]Chappuis V. Avila-Ortiz G. Araújo M.G. Monje A. Medication-related dental implant failure: Systematic review and meta-analysis Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2018 29 55 68 10.1111/clr.13137 30328197 · DOI
  42. [49]D’Ambrosio F. Amato A. Chiacchio A. Sisalli L. Giordano F. Do systemic diseases and medications influence dental implant osseointegration and dental implant health? An umbrella review Dent. J. 2023 11 146 10.3390/dj11060146 37366669 PMC10296829 · DOI
  43. [50]Guimaraes C.C. Lopes L.C. de Cássia Bergamaschi C. Ramacciato J.C. Silva M.T. de Oliveira Araújo J. de Andrade N.K. Motta R.H.L. Local anaesthetics combined with vasoconstrictors in patients with cardiovascular disease undergoing dental procedures: Systematic review and meta-analysis BMJ Open 2021 11 e044357 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044357 PMC8286772 34266837 · DOI
  44. [51]Pökel C. Schulze A. Busse M. Cardiovascular and Vector-Cardiographic Effects of Articaine Anesthesia with Epinephrine Int. J. Dent. 2024 2024 8610423 10.1155/2024/8610423 38962723 PMC11221961 · DOI
  45. [52]Su N. Liu Y. Yang X. Shi Z. Huang Y. Efficacy and safety of mepivacaine compared with lidocaine in local anaesthesia in dentistry: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials Int. Dent. J. 2014 64 96 107 10.1111/idj.12087 24428507 PMC9376404 · DOI
  46. [53]Brockmann W.G. Mepivacaine: A closer look at its properties and current utility Gen. Dent. 2014 62 70 75 25369391
  47. [54]Deol N. Alvarez G. Elrabi O. Chen G. Ferraro N. A comparative review of epinephrine and phenylephrine as vasoconstrictors in dental anesthesia: Exploring the factors behind epinephrine’s prevalence in the US J. Dent. Anesth. Pain Med. 2023 23 293 10.17245/jdapm.2023.23.6.293 38076507 PMC10703557 · DOI
  48. [55]Zahno A. Brecht K. Morand R. Maseneni S. Török M. Lindinger P.W. Krähenbühl S. The role of CYP3A4 in amiodarone-associated toxicity on HepG2 cells Biochem. Pharmacol. 2011 81 432 441 10.1016/j.bcp.2010.11.002 21070748 · DOI
  49. [56]Tamargo J. Le Heuzey J.Y. Mabo P. Narrow therapeutic index drugs: A clinical pharmacological consideration to flecainide Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2015 71 549 567 10.1007/s00228-015-1832-0 25870032 PMC4412688 · DOI
  50. [58]Guimaraes C.C. Motta R.H.L. de Cássia Bergamaschi C. de Oliveira Araújo J. de Andrade N.K. Figueiró M.F. Ramacciato J.C. Lopes L.C. Local anaesthetics combined with vasoconstrictors in patients with cardiovascular disease undergoing dental procedures: Systematic review and meta-analysis protocol BMJ Open 2017 7 e014611 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014611 PMC5719259 29170283 · DOI
  51. [59]Singgih M.F. Achmad H. Sukmana B.I. Carmelita A.B. Putra A.P. Ramadhany S. Putri A.P. A review of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) medications in dentistry: Uses and side effects Syst. Rev. Pharm. 2020 11 293 298
  52. [60]Hughes J.E. Russo V. Walsh C. Menditto E. Bennett K. Cahir C. Prevalence and factors associated with potential drug-drug interactions in older community-dwelling adults: A prospective cohort study Drugs Aging 2021 38 1025 1037 10.1007/s40266-021-00898-8 34632551 PMC8594274 · DOI
  53. [61]Delara M. Murray L. Jafari B. Bahji A. Goodarzi Z. Kirkham J. Chowdhury M. Seitz D.P. Prevalence and factors associated with polypharmacy: A systematic review and meta-analysis BMC Geriatr. 2022 22 601 35854209 PMC9297624
  54. [62]Rochon P.A. Petrovic M. Cherubini A. Onder G. O’Mahony D. Sternberg S.A. Stall N.M. Gurwitz J.H. Polypharmacy, inappropriate prescribing, and deprescribing in older people: Through a sex and gender lens Lancet Healthy Longev. 2021 2 e290 e300 10.1016/S2666-7568(21)00054-4 36098136 · DOI
  55. [63]Davies L.E. Spiers G. Kingston A. Todd A. Adamson J. Hanratty B. Adverse outcomes of polypharmacy in older people: Systematic review of reviews J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2020 21 181 187 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.10.022 31926797 · DOI
  56. [64]Harris E. Study: Polypharmacy Nearly Doubled in 20 Years Among Older Adults in US JAMA 2024 332 524 10.1001/jama.2024.13389 39058505 · DOI
  57. [65]Malekzadeh M. Khadivi Y. Sohrevardi S.M. Afzal G. Drug prescription patterns and compliance with WHO and beers criteria in older patients BMC Geriatr. 2025 25 135 10.1186/s12877-025-05780-5 40016640 PMC11866591 · DOI
  58. [66]Sipos M. Farcas A. Leucuta D.C. Bulik N.B. Huruba M. Dumitrascu D. Mogosan C. Prevalence and Risk Factors Associated with Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing According to STOPP-2 Criteria among Discharged Older Patients—An Observational Retrospective Study Pharmaceuticals 2023 16 852 10.3390/ph16060852 37375799 PMC10304400 · DOI
  59. [67]Błeszyńska E. Wierucki Ł. Zdrojewski T. Renke M. Pharmacological interactions in the elderly Medicina 2020 56 320 10.3390/medicina56070320 32605319 PMC7404696 · DOI
  60. [68]Ngcobo N.N. Influence of Ageing on the Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics of Chronically Administered Medicines in Geriatric Patients: A Review Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2025 64 335 367 10.1007/s40262-025-01494-4 39798015 PMC11954733 · DOI
  61. [69]Maher D. Ailabouni N. Mangoni A.A. Wiese M.D. Reeve E. Alterations in drug disposition in older adults: A focus on geriatric syndromes Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2021 17 41 52 10.1080/17425255.2021.1839413 33078628 · DOI
  62. [70]Drenth-van Maanen A.C. Wilting I. Jansen P.A. Prescribing medicines to older people—How to consider the impact of ageing on human organ and body functions Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2020 86 1921 1930 10.1111/bcp.14094 31425638 PMC7495267 · DOI
  63. [71]Drenth-van Maanen A.C. Spee J. van Hensbergen L. Jansen P. Egberts T. van Marum R.J. Structured history taking of medication use reveals iatrogenic harm due to discrepancies in medication histories in hospital and pharmacy records J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2011 59 1976 1977 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03610_11.x 22091519 · DOI
  64. [72]Bennie M. Santa-Ana-Tellez Y. Galistiani G.F. Trehony J. Despres J. Jouaville L.S. Poluzzi E. Morin L. Schubert I. MacBride-Stewart S. The prevalence of polypharmacy in older Europeans: A multi-national database study of general practitioner prescribing Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2024 90 2124 2136 10.1111/bcp.16113 38812250 · DOI
  65. [73]Faber J. Fonseca L.M. How sample size influences research outcomes Dent. Press J. Orthod. 2014 19 27 29 10.1590/2176-9451.19.4.027-029.ebo 25279518 PMC4296634 · DOI
  66. [74]Sechidis K. Sperrin M. Petherick E.S. Luján M. Brown G. Dealing with under-reported variables: An information theoretic solution Int. J. Approx. Reason. 2017 85 159 177 10.1016/j.ijar.2017.04.002 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Colibășanu, D., Ardelean, S. M., Goldiș, F.-D., Drăgoi, M.-M., Vasii, S.-O., Maksimović, T., Colibășanu, Ș., Șoica, C., & Udrescu, L.
Affiliations
  • Center for Drug Data Analysis, Cheminformatics, and the Internet of Medical Things, “Victor Babeș” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara, 300041 Timișoara, Romania
  • Politehnica University of Timisoara (RO)
  • Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara (RO)
  • Camera de Comerț Industrie și Agricultură Timișoara (RO)
  • Departament II–Pharmacology-Pharmacotherapy, “Victor Babeş” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, 300041 Timișoara, Romania
Corresponding author
Udrescu, Lucreția
Venue
Dentistry Journal
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2025-06-09
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
255
ISSN
2304-6767 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4411156662
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 2
FWCI
5.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Dentistry Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
“Victor Babeș” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Keywords
drug-drug interactions, dental patients, polypharmacy, comorbidities, epinephrine, beta-blockers, age-related risk, patient safety, cardiovascular disease, tooth extraction, apical lesion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review