Cited by 31Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Mechanics and Applications

Metric Structure of the Space of Two-Qubit Gates, Perfect Entanglers and Quantum Control

Open access
Watts, Paul, O'Connor, Maurice, Vala, Jiří·2013·Entropy

Abstract

We derive expressions for the invariant length element and measure for the simple compact Lie group SU(4) in a coordinate system particularly suitable for treating entanglement in quantum information processing. Using this metric, we compute the invariant volume of the space of two-qubit perfect entanglers. We find that this volume corresponds to more than 84% of the total invariant volume of the space of two-qubit gates. This same metric is also used to determine the effective target sizes that selected gates will present in any quantum-control procedure designed to implement them.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/e15061963

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recently, trapped-ion experiments have demonstrated two-qubit gates with errors of 0.001.

    “Recently, trapped-ion experiments have demonstrated two-qubit gates with errors of 0.001 [34], indicating higher quantum volumes should be possible.”

    From Validating quantum computers using randomized model circuits (2019) · cites this paper as [34]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 13 · Cited by 31

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Mehta, M.L. Random Matrices, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1991.

Authors
Watts, P., O'Connor, M., & Vala, J.
Affiliations
  • Dublin Institute For Advanced Studies (IE)
  • National University of Ireland, Maynooth (IE)
Corresponding author
Vala, Jiří
Venue
Entropy
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2013-05-23
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
1963-1984
ISSN
1099-4300 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030523291
Cited by
31
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 3
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Entropy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Maynooth University ePrints and eTheses Archive (Maynooth University) (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Science Foundation Ireland (10/IN.1/I3013, Principal Investigator Award 10/IN.1/I3013)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Keywords
two-qubit gates, compact Lie groups, quantum control, target size, entanglement, quantum information processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review