Cited by 99Fire Detection and Safety SystemsAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsSmart Agriculture and AI

Wildfire and Smoke Detection Using Staged YOLO Model and Ensemble CNN

Open access
Bahhar, Chayma, Ksibi, Amel, Ayadi, Manel, Jamjoom, Mona M., Ullah, Zahid, Soufiene, Ben Othman, Sakli, Hedi·2023·Electronics

Abstract

One of the most expensive and fatal natural disasters in the world is forest fires. For this reason, early discovery of forest fires helps minimize mortality and harm to ecosystems and forest life. The present research enriches the body of knowledge by evaluating the effectiveness of an efficient wildfire and smoke detection solution implementing ensembles of multiple convolutional neural network architectures tackling two different computer vision tasks in a stage format. The proposed architecture combines the YOLO architecture with two weights with a voting ensemble CNN architecture. The pipeline works in two stages. If the CNN detects the existence of abnormality in the frame, then the YOLO architecture localizes the smoke or fire. The addressed tasks are classification and detection in the presented method. The obtained model’s weights achieve very decent results during training and testing. The classification model achieves a 0.95 F1-score, 0.99 accuracy, and 0.98e sensitivity. The model uses a transfer learning strategy for the classification task. The evaluation of the detector model reveals strong results by achieving a 0.85 mean average precision with 0.5 threshold (mAP@0.5) score for the smoke detection model and 0.76 mAP for the combined model. The smoke detection model also achieves a 0.93 F1-score. Overall, the presented deep learning pipeline shows some important experimental results with potential implementation capabilities despite some issues encountered during training, such as the lack of good-quality real-world unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-captured fire and smoke images.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/electronics12010228

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bahhar, C., Ksibi, A., Ayadi, M., Jamjoom, M. M., Ullah, Z., Soufiene, B. O., & Sakli, H.
Affiliations
  • École Nationale d'Ingénieurs de Gabès (TN)
  • Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (SA)
  • King Abdulaziz University (SA)
  • Institut Supérieur d'Informatique et des Technologies de Communication de Hammam Sousse (TN)
  • MACS Research Laboratory RL16ES22, National Engineering School of Gabes, Gabes 6029, Tunisia
Corresponding author
Ayadi, Manel
Venue
Electronics
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-01-02
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
228
ISSN
2079-9292 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4313434480
Cited by
99
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 21
FWCI
17.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Electronics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project (PNURSP2023R104)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Fire Detection and Safety Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
Keywords
forest fire detection, smoke detection, YOLO, ensemble convolutional neural networks, ensemble voting, transfer learning, UAV imagery, object detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review