The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
FBLearn: Decentralized Platform for Federated Learning on Blockchain
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, rapid technological advancements have propelled blockchain and artificial intelligence (AI) into prominent roles within the digital industry, each having unique applications. Blockchain, recognized for its secure and transparent data storage, and AI, a powerful tool for data analysis and decision making, exhibit common features that render them complementary. At the same time, machine learning has become a robust and influential technology, adopted by many companies to address non-trivial technical problems. This adoption is fueled by the vast amounts of data generated and utilized in daily operations. An intriguing intersection of blockchain and AI occurs in the realm of federated learning, a distributed approach allowing multiple parties to collaboratively train a shared model without centralizing data. This paper presents a decentralized platform FBLearn for the implementation of federated learning in blockchain, which enables us to harness the benefits of federated learning without the necessity of exchanging sensitive customer or product data, thereby fostering trustless collaboration. As the decentralized blockchain network is introduced in the distributed model training to replace the centralized server, global model aggregation approaches have to be utilized. This paper investigates several techniques for model aggregation based on the local model average and ensemble using either local or globally distributed validation data for model evaluation. The suggested aggregation approaches are experimentally evaluated based on two use cases of the FBLearn platform: credit risk scoring using a random forest classifier and credit card fraud detection using a logistic regression. The experimental results confirm that the suggested adaptive weight calculation and ensemble techniques based on the quality of local training data enhance the robustness of the global model. The performance evaluation metrics and ROC curves prove that the aggregation strategies successfully isolate the influence of the low-quality models on the final model. The proposed system’s ability to outperform models created with separate datasets underscores its potential to enhance collaborative efforts and to improve the accuracy of the final global model compared to each of the local models. Integrating blockchain and federated learning presents a forward-looking approach to data collaboration while addressing privacy concerns.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“FL with blockchain accelerated drug discovery by 30% by using communal model training on private data instead of sharing them explicitly [68].”
From Federated Learning in Smart Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review on Privacy, Security, and Predictive Analytics with IoT Integration (2024) · cites this paper as [68]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data
McMahan, H. B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., & Arcas, B. A. Y. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1602.05629 · Cited by 14,215
Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme
Matthews, B. W. (1975) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Protein Structure · doi:10.1016/0005-2795(75)90109-9 · Cited by 5,399
McClelland, J. L., Rumelhart, D. E., & AU (1987) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/5237.001.0001 · Cited by 3,315
Communication-efficient federated learning via knowledge distillation
Wu, C., Wu, F., Lyu, L., Huang, Y., & Xie, X. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-29763-x · Cited by 700
Machine learning-driven credit risk: a systemic review
Shi, S., Tse, R. T., Luo, W., d’Addona, S., & Pau, G. (2022) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-022-07472-2 · Cited by 278
Privacy and Security in Federated Learning: A Survey
Gosselin, R., Vieu, L., Loukil, F., & Benoît, A. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12199901 · Cited by 178
Javed, A. R., Hassan, M. A., Shahzad, F., Ahmed, W., Singh, S., Baker, T., & Gadekallu, T. R. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22124394 · Cited by 165
Defining Web 3.0: opportunities and challenges
Rudman, R. J., & Bruwer, R. (2016) · The Electronic Library · doi:10.1108/el-08-2014-0140 · Cited by 152
FIDChain: Federated Intrusion Detection System for Blockchain-Enabled IoT Healthcare Applications
Ashraf, E., Areed, N. F. F., Salem, H., Abdelhay, E. H., & Farouk, A. (2022) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare10061110 · Cited by 121
BFLIDS: Blockchain-Driven Federated Learning for Intrusion Detection in IoMT Networks
Begum, K., Mozumder, M. A. I., Joo, M.-I., & Kim, H. (2024) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s24144591 · Cited by 120
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Menezes, 1990, S. How to time-stamp a digital document, Advances in Cryptology-CRYPTO’90, 537, 437
- Li, 2020, Federated learning: Challenges, methods, and future directions, IEEE Signal Process. Mag., 37, 50
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Abbas, S. R., Abbas, Z., Zahir, A., & Lee, S. W. (2024) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare12242587 · Cited by 228
Metadata
- Authors
- Djolev, D., Lazarova, M., & Nakov, O.
- Affiliations
- Technical University of Sofia (BG)
- Corresponding author
- Lazarova, Milena
- ORCID
- Lazarova, Milena
- Venue
- Electronics
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2024-09-16
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 3672
- ISSN
- 2079-9292 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4402781199
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- dx.doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Electronics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- European Union—NextGenerationEU via the National Recovery and Resilience Plan of the Republic of Bulgaria under project BG-RRP-2.004-0005 “Improving the research capacity and quality to achieve international recognition and reSilience of TU-Sofia (IDEAS)” (BG-RRP-2.004-0005)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
- Keywords
- federated learning, blockchain, decentralized platforms, model aggregation, ensemble learning, data privacy, credit scoring, credit card fraud detection, distributed training
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: FBLearn: Decentralized Platform for Federated Learning on Blockchain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/electronics13183672
- The paper
- Djolev, D., Lazarova, M., & Nakov, O. (2024). FBLearn: Decentralized Platform for Federated Learning on Blockchain. Electronics. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13183672