Cited by 14Electric Vehicles and InfrastructureBlockchain Technology Applications and SecuritySmart Grid Energy Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for Blockchain-Based Energy Trading in Decentralized Electric Vehicle Charger-Sharing Networks

Open access
Han, Yinjie, Meng, Jingyi, Luo, Zihang·2024·Electronics

Abstract

With The integration of renewable energy sources into smart grids and electric vehicle (EV) charger-sharing networks is essential for achieving the goal of environmental sustainability. However, the uneven distribution of distributed energy trading among EVs, fixed charging stations (FCSs), and mobile charging stations (MCSs) introduces challenges such as inadequate supply at FCSs and prolonged latencies at MCSs. In this paper, we propose a multi-agent deep reinforcement learning (MADRL)-based auction algorithm for energy trading that effectively balances charger supply with energy demand in distributed EV charging markets, while also reducing total charging latency. Specifically, this involves a MADRL-based hierarchical auction that dynamically adapts to real-time conditions, optimizing the balance of supply and demand. During energy trading, each EV, acting as a learning agent, can refine its bidding strategy to participate in various local energy trading markets, thus enhancing both individual utility and global social welfare. Furthermore, we design a cross-chain scheme to securely record and verify transaction results of energy trading in decentralized EV charger-sharing networks to ensure integrity and transparency. Finally, experimental results show that the proposed algorithm significantly outperforms both the second-price and double auctions in increasing global social welfare and reducing total charging latency.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/electronics13214235

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Danial, M., Azis, F.A., and Abas, P.E. (2021). Techno-economic analysis and feasibility studies of electric vehicle charging station. World Electr. Veh. J., 12. · DOI
  2. Ma, J., Zhang, Y., Duan, Z., and Tang, L. (2023). PROLIFIC: Deep Reinforcement Learning for Efficient EV Fleet Scheduling and Charging. Sustainability, 15. · DOI
  3. Shi, 2023, Flexible solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries based on structural designs, Energy Storage Mater., 57, 429, 10.1016/j.ensm.2023.02.031 · DOI
  4. Wang, 2024, Acceleration estimation of signal propagation path length changes for wireless sensing, IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., 23, 11476, 10.1109/TWC.2024.3382425 · DOI
  5. Wang, J., Du, H., Liu, Y., Sun, G., Niyato, D., Mao, S., Kim, D.I., and Shen, X. (2024). Generative AI based Secure Wireless Sensing for ISAC Networks. arXiv.
  6. Lai, 2021, Utility optimal thread assignment and resource allocation in multi-server systems, IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., 30, 735, 10.1109/TNET.2021.3123817 · DOI
  7. Wang, 2023, Reinforcement contract design for vehicular-edge computing scheduling and energy trading via deep Q-network with hybrid action space, IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput., 23, 6770, 10.1109/TMC.2023.3329643 · DOI
  8. Zhang, 2023, When moving target defense meets attack prediction in digital twins: A convolutional and hierarchical reinforcement learning approach, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., 41, 3293, 10.1109/JSAC.2023.3310072 · DOI
  9. Zhang, 2023, How to disturb network reconnaissance: A moving target defense approach based on deep reinforcement learning, IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur., 18, 5735, 10.1109/TIFS.2023.3314219 · DOI
  10. Kim, 2022, Distributed auction-based incentive mechanism for energy trading between electric vehicles and mobile charging stations, IEEE Access, 10, 56331, 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3170709 · DOI
  11. Aggarwal, 2021, Pets: P2p energy trading scheduling scheme for electric vehicles in smart grid systems, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 23, 14361, 10.1109/TITS.2021.3127577 · DOI
  12. Hou, 2019, Bidding for preferred timing: An auction design for electric vehicle charging station scheduling, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 21, 3332, 10.1109/TITS.2019.2926336 · DOI
  13. Kikusato, 2019, Electric vehicle charging management using auction mechanism for reducing PV curtailment in distribution systems, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 11, 1394, 10.1109/TSTE.2019.2926998 · DOI
  14. Gao, 2021, A price-based iterative double auction for charger sharing markets, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 23, 5116, 10.1109/TITS.2020.3047984 · DOI
  15. Fan, J., Xu, M., Liu, Z., Ye, H., Gu, C., Niyato, D., and Lam, K.Y. (2023, January 10–13). A Learning-based Incentive Mechanism for Mobile AIGC Service in Decentralized Internet of Vehicles. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 98th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2023-Fall), Hong Kong, China. · DOI
  16. Fan, 2023, Decentralized Multimedia Data Sharing in IoV: A Learning-based Equilibrium of Supply and Demand, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 73, 4035, 10.1109/TVT.2023.3322270 · DOI
  17. Kang, 2022, Communication-efficient and cross-chain empowered federated learning for artificial intelligence of things, IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng., 9, 2966, 10.1109/TNSE.2022.3178970 · DOI
  18. Aggarwal, 2021, A survey on energy trading in the smart grid: Taxonomy, research challenges and solutions, IEEE Access, 9, 116231, 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3104354 · DOI
  19. Kim, 2013, Bidirectional energy trading and residential load scheduling with electric vehicles in the smart grid, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., 31, 1219, 10.1109/JSAC.2013.130706 · DOI
  20. Zufiria, 2016, Peer to peer energy trading with electric vehicles, IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst. Mag., 8, 33, 10.1109/MITS.2016.2573178 · DOI
  21. Abou El Houda, Z., Hafid, A.S., and Khoukhi, L. (2021, January 14–23). Blockchain-based reverse auction for v2v charging in smart grid environment. Proceedings of the ICC 2021-IEEE International Conference on Communications, Montreal, QC, Canada. · DOI
  22. Osaba, 2021, A tutorial on the design, experimentation and application of metaheuristic algorithms to real-world optimization problems, Swarm Evol. Comput., 64, 100888, 10.1016/j.swevo.2021.100888 · DOI
  23. Wang, 2021, Multi-UAV cooperative trajectory for servicing dynamic demands and charging battery, IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput., 22, 1599
  24. Wang, 2014, A game-theoretic approach to energy trading in the smart grid, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 5, 1439, 10.1109/TSG.2013.2284664 · DOI
  25. Wang, 2018, Electrical vehicle charging station profit maximization: Admission, pricing, and online scheduling, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 9, 1722, 10.1109/TSTE.2018.2810274 · DOI
  26. Zhou, 2022, A hybrid attention-based deep neural network for simultaneous multi-sensor pruning and human activity recognition, IEEE Internet Things J., 9, 25363, 10.1109/JIOT.2022.3196170 · DOI
  27. Xie, Y., Chan, T.T., Zhang, X., Lai, P., and Pan, H. (2023, January 4–8). Reflection-Optimized Covert Communication for Jammer-Aided Ambient Backscatter Systems. Proceedings of the GLOBECOM 2023-2023 IEEE Global Communications Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. · DOI
  28. Zou, 2022, Intelligent EV charging for urban prosumer communities: An auction and multi-agent deep reinforcement learning approach, IEEE Trans. Netw. Serv. Manag., 19, 4384, 10.1109/TNSM.2022.3160210 · DOI
  29. Wang, 2019, Reinforcement learning for real-time pricing and scheduling control in EV charging stations, IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., 17, 849, 10.1109/TII.2019.2950809 · DOI
  30. Zhang, 2022, How to mitigate DDoS intelligently in SD-IoV: A moving target defense approach, IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., 19, 1097, 10.1109/TII.2022.3190556 · DOI
  31. Zhang, 2023, Towards attack-resistant service function chain migration: A model-based adaptive proximal policy optimization approach, IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput., 20, 4913, 10.1109/TDSC.2023.3237604 · DOI
  32. Asensio, 2022, A field experiment on workplace norms and electric vehicle charging etiquette, J. Ind. Ecol., 26, 183, 10.1111/jiec.13116 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 14

Metadata

Authors
Han, Y., Meng, J., & Luo, Z.
Affiliations
  • Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (CN)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Corresponding author
Han, Yinjie
Venue
Electronics
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-10-29
Volume
13
Issue
21
Pages
4235
ISSN
2079-9292 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403869792
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 5
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Electronics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
Keywords
electric vehicle charging, multi-agent deep reinforcement learning, auction algorithm, social welfare (welfare economics), decentralized energy markets, bidding strategy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review