KELLM: Knowledge-enhanced label-wise large language model for safe and interpretable drug recommendation
Open accessAbstract
The proliferation of electronic health records (EHRs) and advances in deep learning have enabled personalized drug combination recommendations. However, traditional deep learning models often lack the contextual understanding and medical knowledge integration necessary for accurate predictions. While large language model (LLM)-based approaches address some of these challenges, they still fall short in incorporating critical medical knowledge, addressing comprehensive safety constraints such as multi-disease drug contraindications (MDCs), and providing sufficient interpretability of the causal mechanisms behind their outputs. To overcome these limitations, we propose KELLM, a knowledge-enhanced LLM framework for drug recommendations. By linking medical entities in EHRs to an external medical knowledge graph, inputs are enriched with causal chains, enhancing both prediction accuracy and interpretability. Additionally, we introduce a fine-tuned label-wise LLaMA model designed for multi-label classification, which incorporates safety considerations such as drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and MDCs to ensure clinically accurate and safe recommendations. Experimental results show that KELLM achieves state-of-the-art performance in effectiveness and safety metrics, while also providing evidence-based insights through causal chains that clarify its reasoning process. This establishes a new benchmark for trustworthy, interpretable drug combination recommendations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fifteen studies used only open-source models.
“fifteen used only open-source models [67,72,73,96,98,113,129]”
From Explainability of decoder-only clinical large language models: A scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as [96]
Structured decoding approaches enforce interpretable reasoning pathways by construction, rather than hoping that prompted models will faithfully externalize their computations.
“Structured decoding approaches [65,96,101,115,122] enforce interpretable reasoning pathways by construction, rather than hoping that prompted models will faithfully externalize their computations.”
From Explainability of decoder-only clinical large language models: A scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as [96]
Cites
MIMIC-IV, a freely accessible electronic health record dataset
Johnson, A. E. W., Bulgarelli, L., Shen, L., Gayles, A., Shammout, A., Horng, S., Pollard, T. J., Hao, S., Moody, B., Gow, B., et al. (2023) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-022-01899-x · Cited by 3,401 · see citing works
Bao, K., Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., Wang, W., Feng, F., & He, X. (2023) · Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems · doi:10.1145/3604915.3608857 · Cited by 469 · see citing works
When large language models meet personalization: perspectives of challenges and opportunities
Chen, J., Liu, Z., Huang, X., Wu, C., Liu, Q., Jiang, G., Pu, Y., Lei, Y., Chen, X., Wang, X., et al. (2024) · World Wide Web · doi:10.1007/s11280-024-01276-1 · Cited by 367 · see citing works
Data-efficient Fine-tuning for LLM-based Recommendation
Lin, X., Wang, W., Li, Y., Yang, S., Feng, F., Wei, Y., & Chua, T.-S. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.17197 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Explainability of decoder-only clinical large language models: A scoping review
Mishra, N., Abu-Hanna, A., & Calixto, I. (2026) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2026.103501
- Authors
- Xu, T., & Li, B.
- Affiliations
- Yangzhou University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Li, Bin
- ORCID
- Venue
- Electronics
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2025-01-02
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 154
- ISSN
- 2079-9292 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4405994470
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 5
- FWCI
- 4.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Electronics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61972335)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Keywords
- drug-drug interactions, medical knowledge graph, causal chains, interpretability, multi-label classification, electronic health records, drug safety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review