The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CNN-Based Network Intrusion Detection against Denial-of-Service Attacks
Open accessAbstract
As cyberattacks become more intelligent, it is challenging to detect advanced attacks in a variety of fields including industry, national defense, and healthcare. Traditional intrusion detection systems are no longer enough to detect these advanced attacks with unexpected patterns. Attackers bypass known signatures and pretend to be normal users. Deep learning is an alternative to solving these issues. Deep Learning (DL)-based intrusion detection does not require a lot of attack signatures or the list of normal behaviors to generate detection rules. DL defines intrusion features by itself through training empirical data. We develop a DL-based intrusion model especially focusing on denial of service (DoS) attacks. For the intrusion dataset, we use KDD CUP 1999 dataset (KDD), the most widely used dataset for the evaluation of intrusion detection systems (IDS). KDD consists of four types of attack categories, such as DoS, user to root (U2R), remote to local (R2L), and probing. Numerous KDD studies have been employing machine learning and classifying the dataset into the four categories or into two categories such as attack and benign. Rather than focusing on the broad categories, we focus on various attacks belonging to same category. Unlike other categories of KDD, the DoS category has enough samples for training each attack. In addition to KDD, we use CSE-CIC-IDS2018 which is the most up-to-date IDS dataset. CSE-CIC-IDS2018 consists of more advanced DoS attacks than that of KDD. In this work, we focus on the DoS category of both datasets and develop a DL model for DoS detection. We develop our model based on a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and evaluate its performance through comparison with an Recurrent Neural Network (RNN). Furthermore, we suggest the optimal CNN design for the better performance through numerous experiments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A detailed analysis of the KDD CUP 99 data set
Tavallaee, M., Bagheri, E., Lu, W., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Security and Defense Applications · doi:10.1109/cisda.2009.5356528 · Cited by 5,396
A Deep Learning Approach for Intrusion Detection Using Recurrent Neural Networks
Yin, C., Zhu, Y., Fei, J., & He, X. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2762418 · Cited by 2,100
Toward developing a systematic approach to generate benchmark datasets for intrusion detection
Shiravi, A., Shiravi, H., Tavallaee, M., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2012) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2011.12.012 · Cited by 1,345
A Deep Learning Approach for Network Intrusion Detection System
Javaid, A., Niyaz, Q., Sun, W., & Alam, M. (2016) · Proceedings of the 9th EAI International Conference on Bio-inspired Information and Communications Technologies (formerly BIONETICS) · doi:10.4108/eai.3-12-2015.2262516 · Cited by 1,274
Deep learning approach for Network Intrusion Detection in Software Defined Networking
Tang, T. A., Mhamdi, L., McLernon, D., Zaidi, S. A. R., & Ghogho, M. (2016) · 2016 International Conference on Wireless Networks and Mobile Communications (WINCOM) · doi:10.1109/wincom.2016.7777224 · Cited by 806
Random Forest Modeling for Network Intrusion Detection System
Farnaaz, N., & Jabbar, M. A. (2016) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2016.06.047 · Cited by 684
Threat analysis of IoT networks using artificial neural network intrusion detection system
Hodo, E., Bellekens, X., Hamilton, A., Dubouilh, P.-L., Iorkyase, E., Tachtatzis, C., & Atkinson, R. (2016) · 2016 International Symposium on Networks, Computers and Communications (ISNCC) · doi:10.1109/isncc.2016.7746067 · Cited by 441
Performance analysis of NSL-KDD dataset using ANN
Ingre, B., & Yadav, A. (2015) · 2015 International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication Engineering Systems · doi:10.1109/spaces.2015.7058223 · Cited by 374
A network intrusion detection system based on a Hidden Naïve Bayes multiclass classifier
Koc, L., Mazzuchi, T. A., & Sarkani, S. (2012) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.07.009 · Cited by 310
A hybrid intrusion detection system design for computer network security
Aydın, M. A., Zaim, A. H., & Ceylan, K. G. (2009) · Computers & Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2008.12.005 · Cited by 288
Cited by
A systematic literature review for network intrusion detection system (IDS)
Abdulganiyu, O. H., Ait Tchakoucht, T., & Saheed, Y. K. (2023) · International Journal of Information Security · doi:10.1007/s10207-023-00682-2 · Cited by 279
Cao, Z., Liu, B., Gao, D., Zhou, D., Han, X., & Cao, J. (2025) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics14091843 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, J., Kim, J., Kim, H., Shim, M., & Choi, E.
- Venue
- Electronics
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-06-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 916
- ISSN
- 2079-9292 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3032021129
- Cited by
- 420
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 23.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CNN-Based Network Intrusion Detection against Denial-of-Service Attacks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/electronics9060916
- The paper
- Kim, J., Kim, J., Kim, H., Shim, M., & Choi, E. (2020). CNN-Based Network Intrusion Detection against Denial-of-Service Attacks. Electronics. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9060916
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.