The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimal Deep Learning LSTM Model for Electric Load Forecasting using Feature Selection and Genetic Algorithm: Comparison with Machine Learning Approaches †
Open accessAbstract
Background: With the development of smart grids, accurate electric load forecasting has become increasingly important as it can help power companies in better load scheduling and reduce excessive electricity production. However, developing and selecting accurate time series models is a challenging task as this requires training several different models for selecting the best amongst them along with substantial feature engineering to derive informative features and finding optimal time lags, a commonly used input features for time series models. Methods: Our approach uses machine learning and a long short-term memory (LSTM)-based neural network with various configurations to construct forecasting models for short to medium term aggregate load forecasting. The research solves above mentioned problems by training several linear and non-linear machine learning algorithms and picking the best as baseline, choosing best features using wrapper and embedded feature selection methods and finally using genetic algorithm (GA) to find optimal time lags and number of layers for LSTM model predictive performance optimization. Results: Using France metropolitan’s electricity consumption data as a case study, obtained results show that LSTM based model has shown high accuracy then machine learning model that is optimized with hyperparameter tuning. Using the best features, optimal lags, layers and training various LSTM configurations further improved forecasting accuracy. Conclusions: A LSTM model using only optimally selected time lagged features captured all the characteristics of complex time series and showed decreased Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) for medium to long range forecasting for a wider metropolitan area.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · Cited by 25,970
Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives
Bengio, Y., Courville, A., & Vincent, P. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2013.50 · Cited by 13,001
Introductory Econometrics for Finance
Brooks, C. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108524872 · Cited by 3,657
Neural networks for short-term load forecasting: a review and evaluation
Hippert, H. S., Pedreira, C. E., & Souza, R. C. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/59.910780 · Cited by 2,221
A review on the prediction of building energy consumption
Zhao, H.-X., & Magoulès, F. (2012) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.049 · Cited by 1,937
Towards End-To-End Speech Recognition with Recurrent Neural Networks
Graves, A., & Jaitly, N. (2014) · Cited by 1,861
Electricity price forecasting: A review of the state-of-the-art with a look into the future
Weron, R. (2014) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2014.08.008 · Cited by 1,646
Electric load forecasting using an artificial neural network
Park, D.-C., El-Sharkawi, M. A., Marks, R. J., Atlas, L., & Damborg, M. J. (1991) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/59.76685 · Cited by 1,440
State of the art in building modelling and energy performances prediction: A review
Foucquier, A., Robert, S., Suard, F., Stéphan, L., & Jay, A. (2013) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.004 · Cited by 832
A review of data-driven approaches for prediction and classification of building energy consumption
Wei, Y., Zhang, X., Shi, Y., Xia, L., Pan, S., Wu, J., Han, M., & Zhao, X. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.108 · Cited by 803
Cited by
Artificial intelligence for waste management in smart cities: a review
Fang, B., Yu, J., Chen, Z., Osman, A. I., Farghali, M., Ihara, I., Hamza, E. H., Rooney, D. W., & Yap, P.-S. (2023) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-023-01604-3 · Cited by 629
Multi-Sequence LSTM-RNN Deep Learning and Metaheuristics for Electric Load Forecasting
Bouktif, S., Fiaz, A., Ouni, A., & Serhani, M. A. (2020) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en13020391 · Cited by 256
Self-citationElectrical Load Forecasting Using Edge Computing and Federated Learning
Taik, A., & Cherkaoui, S. (2020) · ICC 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) · doi:10.1109/icc40277.2020.9148937 · Cited by 252
Zhou, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, K., Kang, L., Peng, F., Wang, L., & Pang, J. (2020) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114169 · Cited by 201
Pinheiro, M. G., Madeira, S. C., & Francisco, A. P. (2023) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120493 · Cited by 119
Metadata
- Authors
- Bouktif, S., Fiaz, A., Ouni, A., & Serhani, M.
- Venue
- Energies
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2018-06-22
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1636
- ISSN
- 1996-1073 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2809317444
- Cited by
- 915
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 27.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimal Deep Learning LSTM Model for Electric Load Forecasting using Feature Selection and Genetic Algorithm: Comparison with Machine Learning Approaches †. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/en11071636
- The paper
- Bouktif, S., Fiaz, A., Ouni, A., & Serhani, M. (2018). Optimal Deep Learning LSTM Model for Electric Load Forecasting using Feature Selection and Genetic Algorithm: Comparison with Machine Learning Approaches †. Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11071636
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.