CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 13Wireless Power Transfer SystemsElectric Vehicles and InfrastructureElectric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies

Analysis of Battery Reduction for an Improved Opportunistic Wireless-Charged Electric Bus

Open access
Yin, Andong, Wu, Shenchun, Li, Weihan, Hu, Jinfang·2019·Energies
DOI 10.3390/en12152866
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

As an attractive alternative to the traditional plug-in charged electric vehicles (EVs), wireless-charged EVs have recently been in the spotlight. Opportunistically charged utilizing the wireless-charging infrastructure installed under the road at bus stops, an electric bus can have a smaller and lighter battery pack. In this paper, an improved opportunistic wireless-charging system (OWCS) for electric bus is introduced, which includes the opportunistic stationary wireless-charging system (OSWCS) and opportunistic hybrid wireless-charging system (OHWCS) consisting of stationary wireless-charging and dynamic wireless-charging. A general battery reduction model is established for the opportunistic wireless-charged electric bus (OWCEB). Two different battery-reduction models are built separately for OWCEB on account of the characteristics of OSWCS and OHWCS. Additionally, the cost saving models including the production cost saving, the operation cost saving and total cost saving are established. Then, the mathematical models are demonstrated with a numerical example intuitively. Furthermore, we analyze several parameters that influence the effectiveness of battery reduction due to the application of an opportunistic wireless-charging system on an electric bus. Finally, some points worth discussing in this work are performed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/en12152866

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SWC and DWC are combined and show promising results but are expected to also feature a high cost.

    “SWC and DWC are combined in [164], [165] and show promising results but are expected to also feature a high cost.”

    From A Review of Bidirectional On-Board Chargers for Electric Vehicles (2021) · cites this paper as [165]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Varga, B.O.; Sagoian, A.; Mariasiu, F. Prediction of Electric Vehicle Range: A Comprehensive Review of Current Issues and Challenges. Energies 2019, 12, 19. [CrossRef] · DOI
  2. Yuan, X.; Zhang, C.; Hong, G.; Huang, X.; Li, L. Method for evaluating the real-world driving energy consumptions of electric vehicles. Energy 2017, 141, 1955-1968. [CrossRef] · DOI
  3. Amjad, M.; Ahmad, A.; Rehmani, M.H.; Umer, T. A review of EVs charging: From the perspective of energy optimization, optimization approaches, and charging techniques. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2018, 62, 386-417. [CrossRef] · DOI
  4. Etacheri, V.; Marom, R.; Elazari, R.; Salitra, G.; Aurbach, D. Challenges in the development of advanced Li-ion batteries: A review. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 3243-3262. [CrossRef] · DOI
  5. Liu, D.; Song, Y.; Li, L.; Liao, H.; Peng, Y. On-line life cycle health assessment for lithium-ion battery in electric vehicles. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 199, 1050-1065. [CrossRef] · DOI
  6. Gerssen-Gondelach, S.J.; Faaij, A.P.C. Performance of batteries for electric vehicles on short and longer term. J. Power Sources 2012, 212, 111-129. [CrossRef] · DOI
  7. Lipu, M.S.H.; Hannan, M.A.; Hussain, A.; Hoque, M.M.; Ker, P.J.; Saad, M.H.M.; Ayob, A. A review of state of health and remaining useful life estimation methods for lithium-ion battery in electric vehicles: Challenges and recommendations. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 205, 115-133. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  8. Hannan, M.A.; Hoque, M.M.; Hussain, A.; Yusof, Y.; Ker, P.J. State-of-the-Art and Energy Management System of Lithium-Ion Batteries in Electric Vehicle Applications: Issues and Recommendations. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 19362-19378. [CrossRef] · DOI
  9. Sample, A.P.; Meyer, D.T.; Smith, J.R. Analysis, Experimental Results, and Range Adaptation of Magnetically Coupled Resonators for Wireless Power Transfer. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2011, 58, 544-554. [CrossRef] · DOI
  10. Chen, G.D.; Rao, C.; Sun, Y.; Chen, Z.X.; Tang, C.S.; Zhang, Z.P. Primary Control Method of Wireless Charging System Based on Load Characteristics. Energies 2019, 12, 17. [CrossRef] · DOI
  11. Joseph, P.K.; Elangovan, D. A review on renewable energy powered wireless power transmission techniques for light electric vehicle charging applications. J. Energy Storage 2018, 16, 145-155. [CrossRef] · DOI
  12. Zhang, Z.; Pang, H.; Georgiadis, A.; Cecati, C. Wireless Power Transfer-An Overview. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2019, 66, 1044-1058. [CrossRef] · DOI
  13. Bi, Z.C.; Kan, T.; Mi, C.C.; Zhang, Y.M.; Zhao, Z.M.; Keoleian, G.A. A review of wireless power transfer for electric vehicles: Prospects to enhance sustainable mobility. Appl. Energy 2016, 179, 413-425. [CrossRef] · DOI
  14. Sanchez-Sutil, F.; Hernández, J.C.; Tobajas, C. Overview of electrical protection requirements for integration of a smart DC node with bidirectional electric vehicle charging stations into existing AC and DC railway grids. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2015, 122, 104-118. [CrossRef] · DOI
  15. Hernandez, J.C.; Sutil, F.S.; Vidal, P.G. Protection of a multiterminal DC compact node feeding electric vehicles on electric railway systems, secondary distribution networks, and PV systems. Turk. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 2016, 24, 3123-3143. [CrossRef] · DOI
  16. Sun, L.; Ma, D.; Tang, H. A review of recent trends in wireless power transfer technology and its applications in electric vehicle wireless charging. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 91, 490-503. [CrossRef] · DOI
  17. Vaka, R.; Keshri, R.K. Review on Contactless Power Transfer for Electric Vehicle Charging. Energies 2017, 10, 20.
  18. Panchal, C.; Stegen, S.; Lu, J. Review of static and dynamic wireless electric vehicle charging system. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 2018, 21, 922-937. [CrossRef] · DOI
  19. Lukic, S.; Pantic, Z. Cutting the Cord: Static and Dynamic Inductive Wireless Charging of Electric Vehicles. IEEE Electrif. Mag. 2013, 1, 57-64. [CrossRef] · DOI
  20. Jeong, S.; Jang, Y.J.; Kum, D. Economic Analysis of the Dynamic Charging Electric Vehicle. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2015, 30, 6368-6377. [CrossRef] · DOI
  21. Yang, C.; Lou, W.; Yao, J.; Xie, S. On Charging Scheduling Optimization for a Wirelessly Charged Electric Bus System. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2018, 19, 1814-1826. [CrossRef] · DOI
  22. Jang, Y.J.; Suh, E.S.; Kim, J.W. System Architecture and Mathematical Models of Electric Transit Bus System Utilizing Wireless Power Transfer Technology. IEEE Syst. J. 2016, 10, 495-506. [CrossRef] · DOI
  23. Hwang, I.; Jang, Y.J.; Ko, Y.D.; Lee, M.S. System Optimization for Dynamic Wireless Charging Electric Vehicles Operating in a Multiple-Route Environment. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2018, 19, 1709-1726. [CrossRef] · DOI
  24. Bi, Z.C.; Song, L.J.; De Kleine, R.; Mi, C.C.; Keoleian, G.A. Plug-in vs. wireless charging: Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas emissions for an electric bus system. Appl. Energy 2015, 146, 11-19. [CrossRef] · DOI
  25. Ahn, S.; Suh, N.P.; Cho, D. Charging up the road. IEEE Spectr. 2013, 50, 48-54. [CrossRef] · DOI
  26. Ko, Y.D.; Jang, Y.J. The Optimal System Design of the Online Electric Vehicle Utilizing Wireless Power Transmission Technology. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2013, 14, 1255-1265. [CrossRef] · DOI
  27. Jang, Y.J.; Jeong, S.; Lee, M.S. Initial Energy Logistics Cost Analysis for Stationary, Quasi-Dynamic, and Dynamic Wireless Charging Public Transportation Systems. Energies 2016, 9, 23. [CrossRef] · DOI
  28. Patnaik, L.; Huynh, P.S.; Vincent, D.; Williamson, S.S. Wireless Opportunity Charging as an Enabling Technology for EV Battery Size Reduction and Range Extension: Analysis of an Urban Drive Cycle Scenario. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE PELS Workshop on Emerging Technologies: Wireless Power Transfer (Wow), Montréal, QC, Canada, 3-7 June 2018; pp. 1-5.
  29. Kalwar, K.A.; Aamir, M.; Mekhilef, S. Inductively coupled power transfer (ICPT) for electric vehicle charging-A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 47, 462-475. [CrossRef] · DOI
  30. Gao, Y.; Jiang, J.C.; Zhang, C.P.; Zhang, W.G.; Ma, Z.Y.; Jiang, Y. Lithium-ion battery aging mechanisms and life model under different charging stresses. J. Power Sources 2017, 356, 103-114. [CrossRef] · DOI
  31. Xiong, R.; He, H.W.; Sun, F.C.; Zhao, K. Evaluation on State of Charge Estimation of Batteries with Adaptive Extended Kalman Filter by Experiment Approach. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2013, 62, 108-117. [CrossRef] · DOI
  32. Zheng, Y.; Ouyang, M.; Lu, L.; Li, J.; Han, X.; Xu, L.; Ma, H.; Dollmeyer, T.A.; Freyermuth, V. Cell state-of-charge inconsistency estimation for LiFePO 4 battery pack in hybrid electric vehicles using mean-difference model. Appl. Energy 2013, 111, 571-580. [CrossRef] · DOI
  33. Marano, V.; Onori, S.; Guezennec, Y.; Rizzoni, G.; Madella, N. Lithium-ion Batteries Life Estimation for Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference, Dearborn, MI, USA, 7-10 September 2009; Volumes 1-3, pp. 476-483.
  34. Tang, L.; Rizzoni, G.; Onori, S. Energy Management Strategy for HEVs Including Battery Life Optimization. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif. 2015, 1, 211-222. [CrossRef] · DOI
  35. Samad, N.A.; Kim, Y.; Siegel, J.B.; Stefanopoulou, A.G. Influence of Battery Downsizing and SOC Operating Window on Battery Pack Performance in a Hybrid Electric Vehicle. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC), Montreal, QC, Canada, 19-22 October 2015; pp. 1-6.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yin, A., Wu, S., Li, W., & Hu, J.
Affiliations
Hefei University of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, Weihan
ORCID
Li, Weihan
Venue
Energies
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-07-25
Volume
12
Issue
15
Pages
2866
ISSN
1996-1073 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3390/en12152866
OpenAlex
W2963325870
Cited by
13
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Energies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (1808085QE122)
  • The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (JZ2017HGTA0174 and JZ2016HGBZ1020)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Wireless Power Transfer Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
Keywords
wireless charging, electric buses, dynamic wireless charging, production costs, operating costs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review