Cited by 8Digital Transformation in IndustryDigital Innovation in IndustriesCorporate Management and Leadership

Hybrid Framework for Investigating Digital Transformation Barriers in the Oil and Gas Sector

Open access
Alshibani, Adel, Alkhathami, Saleh Musleh, Hassanain, Mohammad A., Tuffaha, Firas, Ouis, Djamel, Mohammed, Awsan·2024·Energies

Abstract

The oil and gas (O&G) sector depends on information analysis, making digital transformation vital. Industry-specific factors like environmental, regulatory, operational, and security challenges shape its tech adoption. This paper identifies and examines the barriers and drivers of digital transformation in O&G through a literature review and expert insights, leading to a questionnaire assessment. Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) was employed to create a structural model that illustrates the interactions between these barriers, helping experts understand how to achieve digitization within the industry. The questionnaire analysis identified the key barriers based on their RII values: “Experiments requiring significant time for validation of new technologies”, “Technical complexities of new technologies”, “Security concerns”, “Insufficient strategies”, and “Organizational culture and resistance to change”. The ISM indicated that the “Technical complexities of new technologies” and the “Lack of readily deployable technologies” are the most influential barriers. Addressing these is crucial for O&G companies to unlock digitalization potential.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/en17236151

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 8

Authors
Alshibani, A., Alkhathami, S. M., Hassanain, M. A., Tuffaha, F., Ouis, D., & Mohammed, A.
Affiliations
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA)
Corresponding author
Ouis, Djamel
Venue
Energies
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-12-06
Volume
17
Issue
23
Pages
6151
ISSN
1996-1073 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4405114222
Cited by
8
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Energies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM), Saudi Arabia
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Digital Innovation in Industries
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Management and Leadership
Keywords
digital transformation, oil and gas industry, technology adoption barriers, drivers of digitalization, interpretive structural modeling, organizational resistance to change, cybersecurity concerns, organizational culture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review