Cited by 4Probiotics and Fermented FoodsFood and Agricultural SciencesInfant Nutrition and Health

Chemical Characterization and Impact of Nipple Fruit (Solanum mammosum) on the Characteristics of Lactobacillus acidophilus LA K

Open access
Aleman, Ricardo S., Avila, Dany, Avila, Allan, Losso, Jack N., Picha, David, Xu, Zhimin, Aryana, Kayanush·2023·Fermentation

Abstract

Nipple fruit (Solanum mammosum) has been considered to have great pharmaceutical potential because of its high amounts of solamargine and solasonine. This study aimed to examine the effect of nipple fruit at different concentrations (0.5%, 1%, and 2% (w/v)) on the viability, acid, bile, lysozyme, and gastric juice tolerance, and protease activity of Lactobacillus acidophilus LA K. The viability was studied in MRS broth. Acid tolerance was determined by adjusting the pH to 2, whereas bile tolerance was examined with oxgall 0.3% (w/v) in MRS broth. Lysozyme resistance was investigated in an electrolyte solution with lysozyme (100 mg/L), while gastric juice tolerance was analyzed with pepsin and NaCl. Protease activity was determined spectrophotometrically at 340 nm in skim milk with o-phthaldialdehyde reagent. L. acidophilus LA K was incubated anaerobically (37 °C). Microbial growth was determined every 2 h for 10 h of incubation. Acid tolerance was determined at 0, 5, and 15 min, whereas bile tolerance was analyzed at 0, 4, and 8 h of incubation. Lysozyme tolerance was determined at 0, 1, and 2 h of incubation, while gastric juice tolerance was determined at pH 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7. Protease activity was evaluated at 0, 12, and 24 h incubation. Nipple fruit’s chemical and bioactive compounds were also examined to discuss their impact on the survival of L. acidophilus LA K. Nipple fruit did not affect microbial growth, bile, and acid tolerance. Nipple fruit at 2% had higher survivability on the simulated gastric juice and lysozyme resistance and increased protease activity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/fermentation9080715

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aleman, R. S., Avila, D., Avila, A., Losso, J. N., Picha, D., Xu, Z., & Aryana, K.
Affiliations
  • School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70808, USA
  • Universidad Nacional de Agricultura (HN)
  • Louisiana State University (US)
Corresponding author
Aryana, Kayanush
Venue
Fermentation
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-07-28
Volume
9
Issue
8
Pages
715
ISSN
2311-5637 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385350606
Cited by
4
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 4
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fermentation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • University National of Agriculture (Honduras) (C-DSIP-008-2023-UNAG, LAB94511)
  • USDA Hatch funds (C-DSIP-008-2023-UNAG, LAB94511)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
Keywords
Solanum mammosum, Lactobacillus acidophilus, probiotic viability, acid resistance, bile tolerance, lysozyme resistance, gastric juice tolerance, proteolytic activity, solamargine, solasonine, bioactive compounds, fermented milk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review