The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Review of ARIMA vs. Machine Learning Approaches for Time Series Forecasting in Data Driven Networks
Open accessAbstract
In the broad scientific field of time series forecasting, the ARIMA models and their variants have been widely applied for half a century now due to their mathematical simplicity and flexibility in application. However, with the recent advances in the development and efficient deployment of artificial intelligence models and techniques, the view is rapidly changing, with a shift towards machine and deep learning approaches becoming apparent, even without a complete evaluation of the superiority of the new approach over the classic statistical algorithms. Our work constitutes an extensive review of the published scientific literature regarding the comparison of ARIMA and machine learning algorithms applied to time series forecasting problems, as well as the combination of these two approaches in hybrid statistical-AI models in a wide variety of data applications (finance, health, weather, utilities, and network traffic prediction). Our review has shown that the AI algorithms display better prediction performance in most applications, with a few notable exceptions analyzed in our Discussion and Conclusions sections, while the hybrid statistical-AI models steadily outperform their individual parts, utilizing the best algorithmic features of both worlds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421
An Analysis of Transformations
Box, G. E. P., & Cox, D. R. (1964) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1964.tb00553.x · Cited by 15,052
No free lunch theorems for optimization
Wolpert, D. H., & Macready, W. G. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/4235.585893 · Cited by 14,237
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., Eirug, A., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002 · Cited by 4,611
Time series forecasting using a hybrid ARIMA and neural network model
Zhang, G. P. (2003) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/s0925-2312(01)00702-0 · Cited by 4,428
Automatic Time Series Forecasting: The forecast Package for R
Hyndman, R. J., & Khandakar, Y. (2008) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v027.i03 · Cited by 3,511
Statistical and machine learning forecasting methods: Concerns and ways forward
Makridakis, S., Spiliotis, E., & Assimakopoulos, V. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0194889 · Cited by 1,528
A Comparison of ARIMA and LSTM in Forecasting Time Series
Siami-Namini, S., Tavakoli, N., & Siami Namin, A. (2018) · 2018 17th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA) · doi:10.1109/icmla.2018.00227 · Cited by 1,387
A novel cryptocurrency price trend forecasting model based on LightGBM
Sun, X., Liu, M., & Sima, Z. (2020) · Finance Research Letters · doi:10.1016/j.frl.2018.12.032 · Cited by 519
Metadata
- Authors
- Kontopoulou, V. I., Panagopoulos, A. D., Kakkos, I., & Matsopoulos, G. K.
- Venue
- Future Internet
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2023-07-30
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 255
- ISSN
- 1999-5903 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4385399619
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 80.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Review of ARIMA vs. Machine Learning Approaches for Time Series Forecasting in Data Driven Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/fi15080255
- The paper
- Kontopoulou, V. I., Panagopoulos, A. D., Kakkos, I., & Matsopoulos, G. K. (2023). A Review of ARIMA vs. Machine Learning Approaches for Time Series Forecasting in Data Driven Networks. Future Internet. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15080255
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.