Cited by 35Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Recent Advancements in Federated Learning: State of the Art, Fundamentals, Principles, IoT Applications and Future Trends

Open access
Papadopoulos, Christos, Kollias, Konstantinos-Filippos, Fragulis, George F.·2024·Future Internet

Abstract

Federated learning (FL) is creating a paradigm shift in machine learning by directing the focus of model training to where the data actually exist. Instead of drawing all data into a central location, which raises concerns about privacy, costs, and delays, FL allows learning to take place directly on the device, keeping the data safe and minimizing the need for transfer. This approach is especially important in areas like healthcare, where protecting patient privacy is critical, and in industrial IoT settings, where moving large numbers of data is not practical. What makes FL even more compelling is its ability to reduce the bias that can occur when all data are centralized, leading to fairer and more inclusive machine learning outcomes. However, it is not without its challenges—particularly with regard to keeping the models secure from attacks. Nonetheless, the potential benefits are clear: FL can lower the costs associated with data storage and processing, while also helping organizations to meet strict privacy regulations like GDPR. As edge computing continues to grow, FL’s decentralized approach could play a key role in shaping how we handle data in the future, moving toward a more privacy-conscious world. This study identifies ongoing challenges in ensuring model security against adversarial attacks, pointing to the need for further research in this area.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/fi16110415

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Federated learning is essential in healthcare IoT networks for securing sensitive information and as a mechanism to create a sense of security in AI applications across healthcare providers and patients.

    “Consequently, FL is not only essential in healthcare IoT networks for securing sensitive information but also as a mechanism to create a sense of security in AI applications across healthcare providers and patients [19,20].”

    From Federated Learning in Smart Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review on Privacy, Security, and Predictive Analytics with IoT Integration (2024) · cites this paper as [19]

    Section 3.1.1 (page not provided) says FL keeps raw data on users’ devices, reduces security risks, and enhances trust, with particular benefits in healthcare. The paper also discusses privacy-preserving healthcare and IoT applications, but the cited passages do not specifically establish a sense of security in AI applications among both healthcare providers and patients. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 99 · Cited by 35

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Beutel, D.; Topal, T.; Mathur, A.; Qiu, X.; Fernandez-Marques, J.; Gao, Y.; Sani, L.; Kwing, H.; Parcollet, T.; Gusmão, P.; et al. A Flower: A Friendly Federated Learning Research Framework. arXiv 2007, arXiv:2007.14390. · arXiv
  2. McMahan, B.; Moore, E.; Ramage, D.; Hampson, S.; Arcas, Y.B.A. Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, PMLR, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA, 20-22 April 2017; pp. 1273-1282.
  3. Li, T.; Sahu, A.K.; Talwalkar, A.; Smith, V. Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directions. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 2020, 37, 50-60. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  4. Letizia, N. Parallelism and Horizontal Federated Learning: A Review. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/370130332_Parallelism_and_Horizontal_Federated_Learning_A_Review (accessed on 4 November 2024).
  5. Monreale, A., Alzate, C., Kamp, M., Krishnamurthy, Y., Paurat, D., Sayed-Mouchaweh, M., Bifet, A., Gama, J., Ribeiro, R.P., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; Volume 967, pp. 21-28.
  6. Yuan, H.; Ma, T. Federated Accelerated Stochastic Gradient Descent. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2020, 33, 5332-5344.
  7. Mekkaoui, e.K.; Mesquita, D.; Blomstedt, P.; Kaski, S. Federated Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, PMLR, Online, 27-30 July 2021; pp. 1703-1712.
  8. Nikoloutsopoulos, S.; Koutsopoulos, I.; Titsias, M.K. Personalized Federated Learning with Exact Stochastic Gradient Descent. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2202.09848. · arXiv
  9. Lydia, A.A.; Francis, F.S. Adagrad-An Optimizer for Stochastic Gradient Descent. Int. J. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2019, 6, 566-568.
  10. Rehman, U.M.H., Gaber, M.M., Eds.; Studies in Computational Intelligence; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 111-139.

Authors
Papadopoulos, C., Kollias, K.-F., & Fragulis, G. F.
Affiliations
University of Western Macedonia (GR)
Corresponding author
Fragulis, George F.
Venue
Future Internet
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-11-09
Volume
16
Issue
11
Pages
415
ISSN
1999-5903 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4404244211
Cited by
35
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 2
FWCI
5.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Future Internet (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
federated learning, privacy-preserving machine learning, edge computing, Internet of Things, healthcare data privacy, adversarial attacks, model security, data decentralization, GDPR compliance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review