The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Gender Digital Divide in Developing Countries
Open accessAbstract
Empirical studies clearly show that women in the developing world have significantly lower technology participation rates than men; a result of entrenched socio-cultural attitudes about the role of women in society. However, as studies are beginning to show, when those women are able to engage with Internet technology, a wide range of personal, family and community benefits become possible. The key to these benefits is on-line education, the access to which sets up a positive feedback loop. This review gives an overview of the digital divide, before focusing specifically on the challenges women in developing countries face in accessing the Internet. Current gender disparities in Internet use will be outlined and the barriers that potentially hinder women’s access and participation in the online world will be considered. We will then look at the potential opportunities for women’s participation in a global digital society along with a consideration of current initiatives that have been developed to mitigate gender inequity in developing countries. We will also consider a promising avenue for future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Digital divide: civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-1165 · Cited by 2,937
Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide
Norris, P. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139164887 · Cited by 2,921
The Digital Divide as a Complex and Dynamic Phenomenon
van Dijk, J., & Hacker, K. (2003) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972240309487 · Cited by 1,616
Digital Inequality: From Unequal Access to Differentiated Use
DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Celeste, C., & Shafer, S. A. (2004) · Cited by 1,018
Hilbert, M. (2011) · Women's Studies International Forum · doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2011.07.001 · Cited by 553
Tzannatos, Z. (1999) · World Development · doi:10.1016/s0305-750x(98)00156-9 · Cited by 311
Digital inequality: A five country comparison using microdata
Ono, H., & Zavodny, M. (2007) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.09.001 · Cited by 301
Internet Access by People with Intellectual Disabilities: Inequalities and Opportunities
Chadwick, D., Wesson, C., & Fullwood, C. (2013) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi5030376 · Cited by 300
The Digital Divide and What to Do About It
Hargittai, E. (2003) · Cited by 296
Women and Gender in ICT Statistics and Indicators for Development
Hafkin, N. J., & Huyer, S. (2008) · Information Technologies and International Development · doi:10.1162/itid.2008.00006 · Cited by 135
Cited by
A spatial analysis of the digital gender gap in South Africa: Are there any fundamental differences?
Shiferaw, Y. A. (2024) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123443 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Antonio, A., & Tuffley, D.
- Venue
- Future Internet
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2014-10-31
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 673-687
- ISSN
- 1999-5903 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2126452961
- Cited by
- 411
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 29.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Gender Digital Divide in Developing Countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/fi6040673
- The paper
- Antonio, A., & Tuffley, D. (2014). The Gender Digital Divide in Developing Countries. Future Internet. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi6040673
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.