Cited by 1Lattice Boltzmann Simulation StudiesFlow Measurement and AnalysisAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics

Fluid–Structure Interaction Simulation of a Coriolis Mass Flowmeter Using a Lattice Boltzmann Method

Open access
Haussmann, Marc, Reinshaus, Peter, Simonis, Stephan, Nirschl, Hermann, Krause, Mathias J.·2021·Fluids

Abstract

In this paper, we use a fluid–structure interaction (FSI) approach to simulate a Coriolis mass flowmeter (CMF). The fluid dynamics is calculated by the open-source framework OpenLB, based on the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM). For the structural dynamics we employ the open-source software Elmer, an implementation of the finite element method (FEM). A staggered coupling approach between the two software packages is presented. The finite element mesh is created by the mesh generator Gmsh to ensure a complete open source workflow. The Eigenmodes of the CMF, which are calculated by modal analysis, are compared with measurement data. Using the estimated excitation frequency, a fully coupled, partitioned, FSI simulation is applied to simulate the phase shift of the investigated CMF design. The calculated phase shift values are in good agreement to the measurement data and verify the suitability of the model to numerically describe the working principle of a CMF.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/fluids6040167

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 1

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [15]15. Heuveline, V.; Krause, M.J. Openlb: Towards an efficient parallel open source library for lattice Boltzmann fluid flow simulations. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on State-of-the-Art in Scientific and Parallel Computing-PARA, Reykjavik, Iceland, 6-9 June 2010; Volume 9.

Authors
Haussmann, M., Reinshaus, P., Simonis, S., Nirschl, H., & Krause, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
  • Rota Yokogawa GmbH & Co. KG, 79664 Wehr, Germany
Corresponding author
Haussmann, Marc
Venue
Fluids
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-04-20
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
167
ISSN
2311-5521 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3023144066
Cited by
1
References
47
Citations by year
2022: 1
FWCI
0.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fluids (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • KITopen (cc-by)
Funders
  • Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Flow Measurement and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
Keywords
Coriolis mass flowmeter, fluid-structure interaction, lattice Boltzmann method, OpenLB, Elmer, staggered coupling, eigenmodes, modal analysis, phase shift, excitation frequency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review