Cited by 0Meat and Animal Product QualityViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in InsectsAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact

Development of a Cost-Effective, Heme-Tolerant Bovine Muscle Cell for Cultivated Meat Production

Open access
Oh, Yun Ok, Yu, Chae Won, Cha, Min Jeong, Lee, Eun Ji, Kim, Pil, Chang, Suhwan·2025·Foods

Abstract

One of the critical requirements for the production of artificial meat is to mimic the flavor of the original meat. Therefore, incorporation of heme has been proposed, but it is toxic when added at high concentrations in cell culture systems. Additionally, obtaining heme can be costly depending on the source. In this study, we aimed to support the growth of normal bovine muscle cells (BRMC-F2401, BRMCs) by introducing a bacterial extract obtained from a safe, high-heme-containing Corynebacterium species. The BRMCs exhibited heme toxicity when the bacterial heme level was >20 μM; however, they were adapted to stably proliferate with a 3 on–3 off culture scheme. RNA sequencing of the heme-adapted BRMCs showed gene expression changes, including upregulation of detoxification genes, CYP1A1, CYP26B1, and SERPINB2. The knockdown of these three genes increased heme sensitivity and reversed heme tolerance of the heme-adapted BRMCs. Additionally, ROS levels increased upon heme treatment, suggesting that ROS is an important factor in heme adaptation processes. Collectively, our study presents an affordable strategy to incorporate heme in cultured meat production and the mechanism underlying this process.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/foods14244348

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Authors
Oh, Y. O., Yu, C. W., Cha, M. J., Lee, E. J., Kim, P., & Chang, S.
Affiliations
  • Asan Medical Center (KR)
  • Catholic University of Korea (KR)
Corresponding author
Chang, Suhwan
Venue
Foods
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2025-12-17
Volume
14
Issue
24
Pages
4348
ISSN
2304-8158 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4417436101
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Foods (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Research Foundation of Korea (RS-2024-00343979, 2021R1A6A1A03040260)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Meat and Animal Product Quality
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Keywords
cultured meat, heme, Corynebacterium, heme toxicity, detoxification genes, CYP1A1, CYP26B1, plasminogen activator inhibitor-2, reactive oxygen species, gene knockdown, cell culture adaptation, meat flavor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review