Cited by 105Probiotics and Fermented FoodsConsumer Attitudes and Food LabelingFood and Agricultural Sciences

Nutritional Guidelines and Fermented Food Frameworks

Open access
Bell, Victoria, Ferrão, Jorge, Fernandes, Tito·2017·Foods

Abstract

This review examines different nutritional guidelines, some case studies, and provides insights and discrepancies, in the regulatory framework of Food Safety Management of some of the world’s economies. There are thousands of fermented foods and beverages, although the intention was not to review them but check their traditional and cultural value, and if they are still lacking to be classed as a category on different national food guides. For understanding the inconsistencies in claims of concerning fermented foods among various regulatory systems, each legal system should be considered unique. Fermented foods and beverages have long been a part of the human diet, and with further supplementation of probiotic microbes, in some cases, they offer nutritional and health attributes worthy of recommendation of regular consumption. Despite the impact of fermented foods and beverages on gastro-intestinal wellbeing and diseases, their many health benefits or recommended consumption has not been widely translated to global inclusion in world food guidelines. In general, the approach of the legal systems is broadly consistent and their structures may be presented under different formats. African traditional fermented products are briefly mentioned enhancing some recorded adverse effects. Knowing the general benefits of traditional and supplemented fermented foods, they should be a daily item on most national food guides.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/foods6080065

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In fermented vegetable products, L. plantarum, Levilactobacillus brevis, and Leuconostoc mesenteroides are usually the predominant microbiota.

    “In fermented vegetable products, L. plantarum , Levilactobacillus brevis , and Leuconostoc mesenteroides are usually the predominant microbiota [24].”

    From EVALUATION OF ADHESIVE AND AGGREGATION PROPERTIES OF LACTIC ACID BACTERIA ISOLATED FROM DIFFERENT BIOTOPES (2025) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Introduction says Lactobacillus is usually the most abundant genus in fermented products, providing broad support for bacterial predominance. It does not identify L. plantarum, Levilactobacillus brevis, or Leuconostoc mesenteroides as the predominant species in fermented vegetables; the Fermented Foods and Probiotics section only lists vegetables among food matrices. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 105

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. [1]Lloyd G.E.R. Chadwick J. Mann W.N. Regimen for Health. Hippocratic Writings Penguin Books Ltd. London, UK 1983 154 196
  2. [3]Fijan S. Microorganisms with claimed probiotic properties: An overview of recent literature J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014 11 4745 4767 10.3390/ijerph110504745 24859749 PMC4053917 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [4]Motarjemi Y. The impact of small-scale fermentation technology on food safety in developing countries Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2000 75 213 229 10.1016/S0168-1605(01)00709-7 12036144 · DOI
  4. [7]Zhang J. Wang X. Huo D. Li W. Hu Q. Xu C. Liu S. Li C. Metagenomic approach reveals microbial diversity and predictive microbial metabolic pathways in Yucha, a traditional Li fermented food Sci. Rep. 2016 6 32524 10.1038/srep32524 27578483 PMC5006176 · DOI
  5. [9]Nduko J.M. Matofari J.W. Nandi Z.O. Sichangi M.B. Spontaneously fermented Kenyan milk products: A review of the current state and future perspectives Afr. J. Food Sci. 2017 11 1 11
  6. [10]Mathara J.M. Schillinger U. Kutima P.M. Mbugua S.A. Holzapfel W.H. Isolation, identification and characterization of the dominant microorganisms of kulenaoto: The Maasai traditional fermented milk in Kenya Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2004 94 269 278 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.01.008 15246238 · DOI
  7. [11]Mugula J.K. Nnko S.A.M. Sørhaug T. Changes in quality attributes during storage of togwa, a lactic acid fermented gruel J. Food Saf. 2001 21 181 194 10.1111/j.1745-4565.2001.tb00317.x · DOI
  8. [13]Patel K. Wakhisi J. Mining S. Mwangi A. Patel R. Esophageal cancer, the topmost cancer at MTRH in the rift valley, Kenya, and its potential risk factors ISRN Oncol. 2013 2013 503249 10.1155/2013/503249 24490085 PMC3893746 · DOI
  9. [14]Nieminen M.T. Novak-Frazer L. Collins R. Dawsey S.P. Dawsey S.M. Abnet C.C. White R.E. Freedman N.D. Mwachiro M. Bowyer P. Alcohol and acetaldehyde in African fermented milk Mursik—A possible etiologic factor for high incidence of esophageal cancer in Western Kenya Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2013 22 69 75 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0908 23155139 PMC3538938 · DOI
  10. [15]Wakhisi J. Patel K. Buziba N. Rotich J. Esophageal cancer in north rift valley of western Kenya Afr. Health Sci. 2005 5 157 163 16006224 PMC1831916
  11. [16]Anukam K.C. Reid G. African traditional fermented foods and probiotics J. Med. Food 2009 12 1177 1184 10.1089/jmf.2008.0163 20041769 · DOI
  12. [17]Mahasneh A.M. Abbas M.M. Probiotics and traditional fermented foods: The eternal connection (mini-review) Jordan J. Biol. Sci. 2010 3 133 140
  13. [18]Ranadheera R.D. Bains S.K. Adams M.C. Importance of food in probiotic efficacy Food Res. Int. 2010 43 1 7 10.1016/j.foodres.2009.09.009 · DOI
  14. [20]Rolle R. Satin M. Basic requirements for the transfer of fermentation technologies to developing countries Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2002 75 181 187 10.1016/S0168-1605(01)00705-X 12036141 · DOI
  15. [21]McCartney E. The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly—The Future Global Regulation of Probiotics for Humans and Animals Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference on Probiotics and Prebiotics Budapest, Hungary 20–22 June 2017
  16. [23]Bourdichon F. Casaregola S. Farrokh C. Frisvald J.C. Gerds M.L. Hammes W.P. Harnett J. Huys G. Laulund S. Ouwehand A. Review. Food fermentations: Microorganisms with technological beneficial use Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2012 154 87 97 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.12.030 22257932 · DOI
  17. [24]Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Current status and options for biotechnologies in food processing and in food safety in developing countries Proceedings of the FAO International Technical Conference Guadalajara, Mexico 1–4 March 2010
  18. [25]Franz C.M. Huch M. Mathara J.M. Abriouel H. Benomar N. Reid G. Galvez A. Holzapfel W.H. African fermented foods and probiotics Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2014 190 84 96 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.08.033 25203619 · DOI
  19. [26]Villena J. Kitazawa H. Probiotic microorganisms: A closer look Microorganisms 2017 10.3390/microorganisms5020017 28397750 PMC5488088 · DOI
  20. [27]Tamang J.P. Shin D.-H. Jung S.-J. Chae S.-W. Functional properties of microorganisms in fermented foods Front. Microbiol. 2016 7 578 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00578 27199913 PMC4844621 · DOI
  21. [30]The Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) SMEs, Social Entrepreneurship and Innovation OECD Warsaw, Poland 2010 Chapter 5 185 215
  22. [31]Lofstedt R.E. Vogel D. The changing character of regulation: A comparison of Europe and the United States Risk Anal. 2001 21 399 416 10.1111/0272-4332.213121 11572422 · DOI
  23. [33]Chang Y.Y. Liu J.S. Lai S.L. Wu H.S. Lan M.Y. Cerebellar hemorrhage provoked by combined use of nattokinase and aspirin in a patient with cerebral micro bleeds Int. Med. 2008 47 467 469 10.2169/internalmedicine.47.0620 18310985 · DOI
  24. [37]Inetianbor J. Ezeonu C.S. Ezeonu N.C. Otitoju O.F. Mycotoxins Associated with Fermented Foods: A Critical Review Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288182136 (accessed on 15 June 2017)
  25. [39]Painter J. Rah J.-H. Lee Y.-K. Comparison of international food guide pictorial representations J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2002 102 483 489 10.1016/S0002-8223(02)90113-6 11985405 · DOI
  26. [40]Chilton S.N. Burton J.P. Reid G. Inclusion of fermented foods in food guides around the world Nutrients 2015 7 390 404 10.3390/nu7010390 25580813 PMC4303846 · DOI
  27. [41]Ke L. Yu P. Zhang Z.X. Novel epidemiologic evidence for the association between fermented fish sauce and esophageal cancer in South China Int. J. Cancer 2002 99 424 426 10.1002/ijc.10293 11992412 · DOI
  28. [42]Rabie M.A. Elsaidy S. el-Badawy A.A. Siliha H. Malcata F.X. Biogenic amine contents in selected Egyptian fermented foods as determined by ion-exchange chromatography J. Food Prot. 2011 74 681 685 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-10-257 21477488 · DOI
  29. [53]Yoshiike N. Hayashi F. Takemi Y. Mizoguchi K. Seino F. A new food guide in Japan: The Japanese food guide Spinning Top Nutr. Rev. 2007 65 149 154 10.1301/nr.2007.apr.149-154 17503709 · DOI
  30. [56]Keszei A.P. Schouten L.J. Goldbohm A. van den Brandt P.A. Dairy intake and the risk of bladder cancer in The Netherlands cohort study on diet and cancer Am. J. Epidemiol. 2009 171 436 446 10.1093/aje/kwp399 20042437 · DOI
  31. [58]Adegboye A.R. Christensen L.B. Holm-Pedersen P. Avlund K. Boucher B.J. Heitmann B.L. Intake of dairy products in relation to periodontitis in older Danish adults Nutrients 2012 4 1219 1229 10.3390/nu4091219 23112910 PMC3475232 · DOI
  32. [60]Sunstein C.R. “Choosing Not to Choose” Proceedings of the Risk, Perception, and Response Conference Harvard Center for Risk Analysis, Boston, MA, USA 20–21 March 2014 Harvard School for Public Health 2014
  33. [61]Trichopoulou A. Costacou T. Bamia C. Trichopoulos D. Adherence to a Mediterranean diet and survival in a Greek population N. Engl. J. Med. 2003 348 2599 2608 10.1056/NEJMoa025039 12826634 · DOI · Paper page
  34. [62]Rodrigues S.S.P. Franchini B. Graça P. Almeida M.D.V. A new food guide for the Portuguese population: Development and technical considerations J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 2006 38 189 195 10.1016/j.jneb.2006.01.011 16731455 · DOI

Authors
Bell, V., Ferrão, J., & Fernandes, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Coimbra (PT)
  • Pedagogical University (MZ)
  • University of Lisbon (PT)
Corresponding author
Fernandes, Tito
Venue
Foods
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2017-08-07
Volume
6
Issue
8
Pages
65
ISSN
2304-8158 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2743290846
Cited by
105
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 1
FWCI
11.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Foods (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
Keywords
fermented foods, fermented beverages, dietary guidelines, food safety regulation, probiotics, traditional fermented foods, gut health, food labeling claims, dietary recommendations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review