Impact of Processing and Intestinal Conditions on in Vitro Digestion of Chia (Salvia hispanica) Seeds and Derivatives
Open accessAbstract
Chia seeds present with an excellent nutrient profile, including polyunsaturated fat, protein, fibre and bioactive compounds, which make them a potential food or ingredient to bring beneficial health effects. However, their tough structure could mean that these seeds remain hardly disrupted during digestion, thus preventing the release and digestibility of nutrients. In the present study, different chia products (seeds, whole flour, partially defatted flour and sprouts) were assessed in terms of proteolysis, lipolysis, calcium and polyphenols bioaccessibility and antioxidant activity. In vitro digestions were performed supporting standard intestinal (pH 7, bile salts concentration 10 mM) and altered (pH 6, bile salts concentration 1 mM) conditions. The altered conditions significantly reduced lipolysis, but not proteolysis. Regarding the food matrix, compared to the chia seeds, whole and partially defatted flour increased the hydrolysis of lipids and protein, relating to reduced particle size. Sprouting had an enhancing effect on proteolysis but prevented lipolysis. Calcium bioaccessibility dropped in all the samples in the two intestinal conditions. The digestion process led to increased polyphenols bioaccessibility in all the structures, but reduced antioxidant activity except in the milled structures. In conclusion, milling should be applied to chia seeds prior to consumption in cases where enhancing the potential uptake of macro and micronutrients is targeted, and sprouting is suitable to enhance protein digestibility and reduce lipolysis.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Processing methods such as sprouting, soaking, fermentation, and milling help enhance nutrient bioavailability and digestibility of chia seeds.
“Considering the chia seeds, processing methods such as sprouting, soaking, fermentation, and milling help enhance nutrient bioavailability and digestibility.”
From Nutritional and Functional New Perspectives and Potential Health Benefits of Quinoa and Chia Seeds (2023) · cites this paper as [111]
Milling is ideal for improving chia seeds' macro and micronutrient potential.
“The results conveyed that milling can be ideal for improving chia seeds’ macro and micronutrient potential.”
From Nutritional and Functional New Perspectives and Potential Health Benefits of Quinoa and Chia Seeds (2023) · cites this paper as [111]
Milling disrupts the intestinal structure of chia seeds and leads to enhanced digestibility.
“Milling is an effective method as it helps disrupt the intestinal structure of the seeds and leads to enhanced digestibility.”
From Nutritional and Functional New Perspectives and Potential Health Benefits of Quinoa and Chia Seeds (2023) · cites this paper as [111]
Sprouting improves protein digestibility by decreasing lipolysis in chia seeds.
“In contrast, sprouting improves protein digestibility by decreasing lipolysis in chia seeds.”
From Nutritional and Functional New Perspectives and Potential Health Benefits of Quinoa and Chia Seeds (2023) · cites this paper as [111]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 43
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [39]Mayer A. Poljakoff-Mayber A. The Germination of Seeds 3rd ed. Pergamon Oxford, UK 1982
- Authors
- Calvo-Lerma, J., Paz-Yépez, C., Asensio-Grau, A., Heredia, A., & Andrés, A.
- Affiliations
- Instituto de Ingeniería de Alimentos para el Desarrollo, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain
- Universidad Agraria del Ecuador (EC)
- Universitat Politècnica de València (ES)
- Venue
- Foods
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-03-05
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 290
- ISSN
- 2304-8158 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7143566
- OpenAlex
- W3010547888
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 4.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- dx.doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Foods (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- RiuNet (Universitat Politècnica de València) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Conselleria d'Educació, Investigació, Cultura i Esport (APOSTD2019/102)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Seed and Plant Biochemistry
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
- Keywords
- Salvia hispanica, in vitro digestion, proteolysis, lipolysis, calcium bioaccessibility, polyphenol bioaccessibility, antioxidant activity, milling, sprouting, defatted flour, food matrix, bile salts, intestinal pH, nutrient digestibility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review